1 / 9

Carbon Management Service Methodology and Project Development Workshop

Explore the DOE PCF Workshop insights for project developers in Buenos Aires, focusing on renewable energy, energy efficiency, and project registration. Learn trends, criticism, and crucial issues to enhance methodology and project development.

hong
Télécharger la présentation

Carbon Management Service Methodology and Project Development Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Carbon Management Service Methodology and Project Development – Notions of a DOE PCF Workshop for Project Developers Buenos Aires, Dec. 5th, 2004 Werner Betzenbichler TÜV Industrie Service GmbH – TÜV SÜD Group, Munich, Germany

  2. Experiences CDM / JI Types of project:- Renewable energy (hydro, wind, biomass, geothermal and solar energy)- Fuel Switch in conventional plants- Energy efficiency - Afforestation / Reforestation- Landfill gas capture- HFC and N20 - reduction

  3. Overview • Methodology Development and Approval • Project Development • Project Registration Cycle • Timelines and Costs

  4. Methodology Development Trends: • Movement towards further project types • Inclusion of approved elements • more generic approaches  improved applicability • prepared fall-back positions in case of non-approval Criticism: • Late submissions short before end of deadlines • Uncompleted elements in accompanying draft PDD • hecticness in case of request or “B-decisions”

  5. Methodology Approval Trends: • Impression of improved expertise within the “Roster of Experts” • Enhanced formatting process • new focus on monitoring issues Criticism: • Long reaction time in case of technical request • remaining interpretable issuese.g. - acceptable reservoir of a “run-of-the-river” plant - threshold for “dominated” by low-cost sources (AM0005) - treatment of data uncertainty

  6. Project Development Trends: • yet no market consolidation concerning PDD developers • most activities within leading host countries Crucial issues: • technical expertise in project team • CDM expertise in project team • quality of evidences • reliability and actuality of data sources • transparency of the whole PDD / confidentiality issues • missing local stakeholder process for existing projects • host country’s environmental approval process

  7. Project Registration Cycle Observations: • underestimation of time need by project owners • clear guidance on requirements in case of revisions of PDDs is still outstanding • very diverse behavior of DNAs in the context of the issuance of a letter of approval • time extensive requirements for use of forms and partly translations • remaining risks until the final step of registration

  8. Timelines and Costs Observations: • overambitious deadlines for validation • further delay by late comments during global stakeholder process • recent market price for validation does not reflect in all cases the real effortsreasons: - competition with new entrants - unexpected efforts during the final steps of registration - multiple expertise required (CDM, technology, local and sectoral aspects)

  9. TÜV SÜD Carbon Management Service Werner Betzenbichler Tel. ++49-(0)89 57 91 – 2170 Werner.Betzenbichler@tuev-sued.de www.netinform.net

More Related