1 / 21

Evaluating Winter Tundra Access Methods: Research Conducted in the Mackenzie Delta

Evaluating Winter Tundra Access Methods: Research Conducted in the Mackenzie Delta. Julian Kanigan INAC Overland Winter Access Workshop, Inuvik, April 23-24, 2008. Outline. Operational considerations Snow vs ice roads Multiple seasons Environmental considerations Terrain type

Télécharger la présentation

Evaluating Winter Tundra Access Methods: Research Conducted in the Mackenzie Delta

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evaluating Winter Tundra Access Methods: Research Conducted in the Mackenzie Delta Julian Kanigan INAC Overland Winter Access Workshop, Inuvik, April 23-24, 2008

  2. Outline • Operational considerations • Snow vs ice roads • Multiple seasons • Environmental considerations • Terrain type • Snow depths • Soil strength

  3. Operations: packed snow road • Swimming Point – Fall 1971 (Muskeg Research Institute 1972)

  4. Operations: snow vs ice roads • Norman Wells test road - 1973 Packed snow road Ice-capped snow road Pure ice road (no snow) (Adam 1973)

  5. Operations: snow vs ice roads • Packed snow road • inadequate compaction → failed light vehicle tests • Pure ice road • withstood rubber-tired, but not tracked traffic • Ice-capped snow road • withstood rubber-tired and tracked traffic

  6. Operations: snow vs ice-capped roads • Inuvik snow road - 1974 • Top 25 cm re-packed • No changes in thaw depth or surface elevation • Hardness: Inuvik 1000 R Norman Wells 250 R (Northern Engineering Services 1974, Younkin and Hettinger 1978)

  7. Operations: Multiple Seasons • Shingle Point -1971-72 • Active layer • more severely disturbed areas • terrain type • (Kerfoot 1972)

  8. Environment: Terrain type • Swimming Point Freeze-up 1971-72 • Wet lowland areas: frost penetration slower & sensitive to disturbance • Mallik & Taglu Summer 1973 • Sedge wetlands less sensitive to disturbance than shrub uplands (MRI 1972, 1973)

  9. Environment: Snow depth & Soil strength • Snow - protects vegetation and organic layer → Measure: snow depth snow density road hardness • Soil strength - increases as ground freezes → Measure: ground hardness ground temperature Freezing Degree Days (FDD)

  10. Snow depth & Soil strength – Start-up Dates

  11. Soil strength – Comparison of FDD in Inuvik and Tuktoyaktuk

  12. Snow depths – comparison between Inuvik and Tuktoyaktuk Date of 15 cm snow accumulation Year (Environment Canada 2008)

  13. Snow depths – Tuktoyaktukcomparison between 15 & 20 cm

  14. Snow depth – Shut-down Dates • Swimming Pt. & Parsons Lk. Winter Roads – 1973 • Snow depth • air temperature < 0°C • thin snow cover, southern exposure

  15. Snow depth – Shut-down Dates • Northern Canada Accumulation of 10 thawing degree days (TDD) • Mackenzie Delta Mean daily air temperature > 0°C for 3 consecutive days

  16. Shut-down Dates – Inuvik & Tuktoyaktuk, 10 Thawing Degree Days

  17. Conclusions • Research limitations • Older studies, short-term, lack of baseline, lack of disturbance intensity, qualitative impact assessment • Operational considerations • Packed snow road (Inuvik) and ice-capped snow road (Norman Wells) supported vehicle traffic with minimal environmental disturbance • Roads used over multiple seasons had more severe disturbances

  18. Conclusions • Environment • Sedge wetlands more sensitive to disturbance during fall • Sedge wetlands exhibited less disturbance than shrub uplands • Snow depth and soil strength are critical factors in determining dates for tundra access • Current permit conditions for tundra access dates are protective according to thresholds based on previous research

  19. Conclusions • Environmental variability • Accumulation of FDD during fall is similar at Inuvik and Tuktoyaktuk • Accumulation of 15 cm snow in Inuvik can occur up to 1 month earlier than in Tuktoyaktuk • Accumulation of 10 TDD in Inuvik can occur up to 1 month earlier than in Tuktoyaktuk

  20. Recommendations • Any new guidelines should take into account environmental variability of the region • New research should consider what environmental indicators to measure • New research should evaluate the impact of new operating procedures, and validate past results

  21. Thanks, Questions?

More Related