1 / 24

Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal

Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal. Diagnosis of occupational asthma Catherine Lemiere MD, MSc Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur Université de Montréal. Université de Montréal. Investigation of occupational asthma. Chan-Yeung & Malo. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:107-12. Clinical history.

honorato-valenzuela
Télécharger la présentation

Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal Diagnosis of occupational asthmaCatherine Lemiere MD, MScHôpital du Sacré-CœurUniversité de Montréal Université de Montréal

  2. Investigation of occupational asthma Chan-Yeung & Malo. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:107-12.

  3. Clinical history Occupational asthma * • Final diagnosis • OA (n=75) • Asthma without OA • (n=54) • No asthma, No OA • (n=33) Very probable-prob Uncertain Unlikely-No 65 6 4 25 19 10 14 10 9 Only 65 subjects (63%) out of 104 with a history suggestive of OA had actual OA * Malo JL et al. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991; 143:528-532

  4. Skin tests & RAST • Skin prick tests ± IgE/IgG ... • valid for HMWC & rarely for LMWC • requires good allergen extracts a positive test confirms sensitization but not occupational asthma Neg. pred. value:76% 89% Pos. pred. value:69% 54% Cartier A, JACI 78: 344-8

  5. Serial monitoring of Peak Expiratory Flow rates • When interpreted visually: Sensitivity: 81 à 86%, specificity: 74 à 89%. • Compliance is often bad, effort dependent test, reading of the graphs subjective. • Computerized interpretation of PEF monitoring: Oasys 2 and 3 (sensitivity 75%,82%), specificity: 94% compared to a method of diagnosis independant of PEF (SIC, IgE, or BHR) (Gannon, Thorax 1996; 51:484-9) (Bright et al. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2001 Jun;56(3):281-8).

  6. Specific Inhalation Challenges • Still considered as the gold standard • Require well-trained personnel and are time consuming. • Available in a limited numbers of centers in worldwide. • A negative test does not entirely rule out the diagnosis of OA. The results may be misinterpreted if the wrong agent or process are used; patient has undergone desensitization, or the patient uses a medication inhibiting an asthmatic reaction.

  7. Future diagnostic tools? • Non invasive measurements of airway inflammation (induced sputum, exhaled NO) • In vitro testing (MCP-1)

  8. Induced sputum and occupational asthma

  9. Changes in induced sputum after specific inhalation challenges

  10. Induced sputum and occupational asthma p = 0.03 p < 0.01 3.00 2.40 1.80 Sputum eosinophils, 106/ml 1.20 0.60 0.0 B E B E B E Negative SIC Positive SIC Asthma without OA Lemiere et al JACI 2001; 107: 1063-8

  11. Changes in induced sputum at the workplace

  12. Induced sputum and occupational asthma p= 0.9 p<0.001 p=0.1 p=0.006 5.0 64.0 L L 4.0 8.0 m , / V g 1 E m F 3.0 1.0 , 0 C 2 P 2.0 0.12 1.0 0.015 Work At Off At Off At Off At Off p=0.6 p=0.007 p=0.2 p=0.01 10000 100 % , s l L i / h g p 10 1000 µ o , n P i C s o E E 100 1.0 0.1 10 Lemière C et al. Eur Respir J, 1999; 13: 482-8

  13. With sputum eosinophilia (n=14) Without sputum eosinophilia (n=24) p value SIC 3 9 – % with increased NSBR at presentation 92.9 50 0.012* FEV1 (% predicted) 61.4 (21.2) 0.001* 83 (16) Bronchodilator reversibility (ml) 397 (265) 161 (197) 0.003 * Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) ppb, 10.4 (5.6–17.4) 5.1 (3.7–6.6) 0.001* Subjects with raised NO >9.6 ppb (%) 64.3 4.2 <0.001* Sputum eosinophils (median %) 6.5 0.3 – Sputum neutrophil count (%) 59.5 (19.6) 55.1 (18.8) 0.5 Sputum macrophage (%) 24.6 (9) 43.2 (19.2) 0.002* Anees et al Thorax, 2002 57:231-6

  14. Inflammatory and functional changes in subjects with and without OA * p <0.05 (Girard et al, ATS 2004)

  15. PC20 and Sputum

  16. Sputum andPEF

  17. Occupational asthma and exhaled NO

  18. Exhaled NO and occupational asthma Pipari et al ERJ, 2002;20:1532-7

  19. Exhaled NO and occupational asthma Lund et al Occup Environ Med. 2000;57:274-8.

  20. In vitro testing (MCP-1)

  21. Rationale • Enhanced secretion of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1(MCP-1) by blood mononuclear cells after co-incubation with diisocyanate HSA (DIISO-HSA) is associated with isocyanate-induced asthma (Lummus et al, JACI, 1998102:265-74)

  22. Isocyanate-induced asthma Bersntein et al Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:445-50

  23. Isocyanate-induced asthma Bersntein et al Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:445-50

  24. Conclusions • The diagnosis of occupational asthma is difficult. • New diagnosis tools are needed to make an accurate diagnosis based upon objective measurements. • Non invasive measurements of airway inflammation are promising additional tools in the investigation of OA.

More Related