1 / 32

An update on Recommendations for RAWS and ROMAN

An update on Recommendations for RAWS and ROMAN. Fire Environment Working Team Paul Schlobohm April 15, 2008. Fire Environment Working Team. Fire Weather Committee. Fire Behavior Committee. Fire Danger Committee. Eastern States. Western States. FENWT Chair. Fire Research.

housep
Télécharger la présentation

An update on Recommendations for RAWS and ROMAN

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. An update on Recommendations for RAWS and ROMAN Fire Environment Working Team Paul Schlobohm April 15, 2008

  2. Fire Environment Working Team Fire Weather Committee Fire Behavior Committee Fire Danger Committee Eastern States Western States FENWT Chair Fire Research Predictive Services Group NPSG Fire Air Coordination Team FACT Interagency Fuels Group NIFCG NWS NWCGLiaison Strategic Partners Content not complete without oral presentation

  3. Assignment • RAWS • Address unplanned growth in the size of the network during era of agency budget decline • ROMAN • Should NWCG support ROMAN and if so how? Content not complete without oral presentation

  4. Study Plan • What are our needs for fire weather data now and into the future? • Leverage four on-going assessments • OFCM • NPSG • NWS • NWFEA Content not complete without oral presentation

  5. RAWS ASCADS WFMI WIMS NIFMID FAMWEB WFAS WRCC ROMAN MADIS FPA WFDSS OK-Mesonet OK-FIRE Great Basin RAWS network review BLM RAWS network review FS RAWS network review Stakeholders Content not complete without oral presentation

  6. Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology • Comprehensive review and assessment of fire weather and climate requirements • Comprehensive, nationally beneficial observing system • National station standards • Gridded weather observations • High resolution models in complex terrain • Readily understandable model accuracy • Easy to use graphics available in GIS formats • Coordinated, “one-stop” internet presence • Robust continuity of operations Content not complete without oral presentation

  7. National Wildland Fire Enterprise Architecture • NWFEA recommendations • Virtual Single Agency • Product Management: consistent data collection, improved data sharing, improved data quality • Centralized business-of-fire decision-making • Collaborative abilities on master web sites Content not complete without oral presentation

  8. RAWS • RAWS network is not a requirement; it is a solution to meet requirements • RAWS is a uniquely rural network • Data from many other networks are readily available now • RAWS outputs (e.g. NFDRS) from non-RAWS networks • RAWS supports modeled observations Content not complete without oral presentation

  9. ROMAN • ROMAN is the face of RAWS • 125 million hits in 2006 • ROMAN provides real-time access to many other networks • ROMAN meets user needs unmet by legacy systems Content not complete without oral presentation

  10. Content not complete without oral presentation

  11. Content not complete without oral presentation

  12. SFC-LAND INFORMATION BASES (QC’d DATASETS) SFC-MARINE U/A-IN SITU MADIS Collection, QC, and Distribution U/A-REMOTE SENSING QUALITY CONTROL INFO & Meta Data (Data QC Flags) SATELLITE GRIDS METADATA MADIS Data Sources and Outputs Content not complete without oral presentation

  13. INDIVIDUAL OBS USER -1 TODAY NWS TOC USER-2 INDIVIDUAL OBS USER-N INDIVIDUAL OBS 2008 USER-1 NOAA WITH MADIS USER-2 Integrated/ QC’d Data sets USER-N How the MADIS Transition Will Change NOAA’s Service Content not complete without oral presentation

  14. Internet Three routes from RAWS to ASCADS… or other GOES data clients Content not complete without oral presentation

  15. ASCADS Distributes Point Data to Five Main Clients Content not complete without oral presentation

  16. Content not complete without oral presentation

  17. Conclusions • Critical importance of fire weather data • Firefighter safety • Prescribed fire management • Air quality • Crew readiness • Seasonal resource allocations Content not complete without oral presentation

  18. Conclusions • Purpose of the RAWS network • To support applications of fire weather • Point • Gridded • For • Fire program analysis • Fire danger rating • Fire behavior prediction • Fire weather forecasting • Smoke management Content not complete without oral presentation

  19. Recommendation - RAWS • Size of the RAWS network • Appropriate to achieve purpose of the network • Determine with explicit use of other networks • Determine to meet needs to support gridded data • Support a study to inform decisions on network size Content not complete without oral presentation

  20. Recommendations - ROMAN • Short Term • Support ROMAN as an NWCG mission critical data access system • Programmatic funding to include project management, maintenance, and operations. Content not complete without oral presentation

  21. Recommendations - ROMAN • Long Term • Advance to an Enhanced ROMAN • Develop opportunities with NOAA to provide the networks and gridded products of MADIS through a ROMAN-like user interface. • Pursue ways to link or combine our other data access systems with ROMAN Content not complete without oral presentation

  22. Content not complete without oral presentation

  23. Progress NWCG accepted recommendations Content not complete without oral presentation

  24. RAWS Network Analysis • Study plan approval • Funding to be secured • Analysis planned through 2009 • RAWS ranked for support to 5km grid • Station metadata quality • Non-RAWS applicability to NFDRS Content not complete without oral presentation

  25. ROMAN Business Case • Secured funding • Initiated business case development • Short term recommendations • Long term recommendations • Expect completion: 2008 • Implementation • Short term – 2009 • Long term – 2011? Content not complete without oral presentation

More Related