300 likes | 427 Vues
This paper explores the credibility and influence of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) during the post-communist transition period. While the IMF is often criticized, both qualitative researchers and area specialists recognize its substantial impact. This study questions common assumptions about IMF intervention, illustrates how its influence varies with countries' sizes and conditions, and analyzes the political dynamics at play. Through case studies of Russia, Ukraine, Poland, and Bulgaria, it provides insights into the IMF's role as a strategic actor in shaping economic policies post-transition.
E N D
Lending Credibility The International Monetary Fund and the Post- Communist Transition Randall W. Stone University of Rochester
The IMF The most universally despised of international institutions Left: Executive committee of int’l capitalism Right: Big government writ large Moderates: Criticize tactical mistakes
Area specialists, qualitative researchers and practitioners attribute far-reaching influence to the IMF The Puzzle • Quantitative scholars have yet to • demonstrate this influence • How much influence can an international • institution have?
Faulty assumptions • The IMF only exercises influence during program periods • IMF intervention has a constant effect across countries & over time • IMF intervention is exogenous • Political constraints are omitted variables
Theory: Desirable Features • The IMF is a strategic actor with a credibility problem • Countries vary in “size” • IMF influence depends on international investors • Defection and punishment should happen in equilibrium • Inflation is subject to inertia
The Model • Actors: Many investors, n governments, IMF • Actions: Investors may invest, governments may create inflation, the IMF may disburse a loan tranche • Preferences: Investors, IMF are averse to inflation. IMF prefers to disburse. Countries are tempted to defect, and the temptation is a random variable • Information: The government’s current level of temptation is private information • Repetition: Infinite
The Stage Game • b • N I 1-b •
The Stage Game k • 0 b • N I k 1-b • 0
The Stage Game gi x • k 0 • gi x • 0 b 0 • N I gi x k • 1-b • 0 gi x • 0 0
The Stage Game IMF • s gi • x • • 0 k IMF • s • 0 • • 0 IMF • gi s x • • • 0 0 b IMF • s • • 0 • 0 • N I IMF s • gi x • k • 0 • IMF 1-b s • • 0 • 0 gi IMF • x s • • • 0 0 IMF • s • 0 • 0
Single-shot Nash IMF • s gi • x • • 0 k IMF • s • 0 • • 0 IMF • gi s x • • • 0 0 b IMF • s • • 0 • 0 • N I IMF s • gi x • k • 0 • IMF 1-b s • • 0 • 0 gi IMF • x s • • • 0 0 IMF • s • 0 • 0
Single-shot Nash IMF • s gi • x • • 0 k IMF • s • 0 • • 0 IMF • gi s x • • • 0 0 b IMF • s • • 0 • 0 • N I IMF s • gi x • k • 0 • IMF 1-b s • • 0 • 0 gi IMF • x s • • • 0 0 IMF • s • 0 • 0
Single-shot Nash IMF • s gi • x • • 0 k IMF • s • 0 • • 0 IMF • gi s x • • • 0 0 b IMF • s • • 0 • 0 • N I IMF s • gi x • k • 0 • IMF 1-b s • • 0 • 0 gi IMF • x s • • • 0 0 IMF • s • 0 • 0
Repeat, repeat… IMF • s gi • x • • 0 k IMF • s • 0 • • 0 IMF • gi s x • • • 0 0 b IMF • s • • 0 • 0 • N I IMF s • gi x • k • 0 • IMF 1-b s • • 0 • 0 gi IMF • x s • • • 0 0 IMF • s • 0 • 0
Repeated game equilibrium IMF • s gi • x • • 0 k IMF • s • 0 • • 0 IMF • gi s x • • • 0 0 b IMF • s • • 0 • 0 • N I IMF s • gi x • k • 0 • IMF 1-b s • • 0 • 0 gi IMF • x s • • • 0 0 IMF • s • 0 • 0
Repeated game equilibrium IMF • s gi • x • • 0 k IMF • s • 0 • • 0 IMF • gi s x • • • 0 0 b IMF • s • • 0 • 0 • N I IMF s • gi x • k • 0 • IMF 1-b s • • 0 • 0 gi IMF • x s • • • 0 0 IMF • s • 0 • 0
Repeated game equilibrium IMF • s gi • x • • 0 k IMF • s • 0 • • 0 IMF • gi s x • • • 0 0 b IMF • s • • 0 • 0 • N I IMF s • gi x • k • 0 • IMF 1-b s • • 0 • 0 gi IMF • x s • • • 0 0 IMF • s • 0 • 0
Equilibrium (PBE) • IMF plays “hold the line” with small countries and “tit for tat” with large ones • Governments defect if the temptation exceeds a critical value, which depends on size and whether the program is suspended • Investors invest if there was no inflation in the previous period; interest rates depend on the size of countries
Comparative Statics • Large countries are subject to shorter punishment periods • Large countries defect at a higher rate, so they are punished more frequently and pay higher interest rates • Countries defect more often when programs are already suspended • This effect is smaller in large countries
Research Design • Estimate duration model for IMF status H1: Influence shorter punishment H2: Influence more frequent punishment • Estimate models of policy variables H3: Influence inflation, devaluation H4: Credibility low inflation, stability • Case studies: Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Bulgaria
Cases: Stylized Facts Russia & Ukraine Poland & Bulgaria • Punished briefly •Punished severely • Frequent suspensions •Rare suspensions • Conditions negotiable •Conditions credible • Crises of 1998 •Crisis of 1997
Conclusions • The IMF has far-reaching influence • IMF influence is limited if it cannot credibly commit to enforcing conditionality Reform? Increase the IMF’s independence