Presented by : Vincent James NSP Research Group (British Isles)

1. Presented by : Vincent James NSP Research Group (British Isles) An Introduction to : Adventures in Legal Land & The No State Project every saturdays 9pm GMT by Marc Stevens No State Project UK - Vince James

2. www.nostateproject.co.nr No State Project UK - Vince James

3. No State Project UK - Vince James

4. No State Project UK - Vince James

5. Marc Stevens is the author of the now infamous, inter-continental cult classic “Adventures in Legal Land”, and is currently soon to release his second book “Government Indicted”. No State Project UK - Vince James

6. The first question people ask about Marc’s Book & work is ? “Does it apply in the UK, and under our Legal System” Answer: YES, Absolutely, there may be subtle differences in procedures, and/or word definitions etc., but basically it’s all the same in substance, meaning, and Legal Opinion. The American Legal System was adopted from the English Common law, in and around 1776. No State Project UK - Vince James

7. Marc is not a lawyer or Guru, but like almost all of us was at one time on the receiving end of Bureaucratic & judicial corruption, and was so disillusioned by the experience, he sought to find answers to what he personally had witnessed and observed, not just from his experiences in court but from doing his own investigation and research into the many claims being made by “patriot & freedom movement guru’s” in the early 90’s. • Marc best explains this part of his journey in the “must watch “ Video of his talk given at The Liberty Forum in 2009. titled “Delusions” No State Project UK - Vince James

8. Those who attack the rationale of the game, & not the players, are its most formidable adversaries. — James J. Martin, in the introduction to Lysander Spooner'sNo Treason: The Constitution of No Authority. No State Project UK - Vince James

9. This Best Describes Marc’s approach to dealing with Bureaucrats Marc endeavours to look at the facts, not at the words and fictions hidden behind them, to hide and get away from those facts. In doing so he has demonstrated that the “legal system” and “Government”, is nothing more than a” public relations scam”. By looking at the actual facts using objective observation and logic it is very clear to see the fatal flaws in the system, reason being because of the nature on which is was built. By going to the heart of the matter, using the legal reality "they" have created, you can get them to contradict themselves and prove their claims were never valid or based on facts to begin with. No State Project UK - Vince James

10. This is not about winning your case, as Marc points out, “once you are in the clutches of a bureaucrat or the legal system, you have already lost (ultimately they have guns and are perfectly willing to use them) - now it is simply a matter of trying to prevent further damage. There is no "winning."This talk will hopefully give you a brief insight into Marc’s way of reasoning and questioning, so you too can learn to use "their" system and flawed logic back against them. By understanding the rules that they have placed upon themselves in an effort to appear fair and just, you can use this to your advantage to expose the contradictions within the system. The result being you will embarrass them so badly that they will sooner drop any alleged claim against you in order to save face and not expose the true nature. No State Project UK - Vince James

11. Quote: Rudyard Kipling I keep six honest serving-men (They taught me all I knew); Their names are What and Why and When And How and Where and Who. I send them over land and sea, I send them east and west; But after they have worked for me I give them all a rest No State Project UK - Vince James

12. PART. 1 No State Project UK - Vince James

13. How does the “Law” apply ? No State Project UK - Vince James

14. A legal duty is an obligation imposed by the law. Failure to fulfil such a duty can result in criminal or civil sanctions. Legal duties are distinct from moral or ethical duties; while a duty may be both legal and ethical, only legal duties are enforced by the justice system. Legal duties can be created in several ways and by several different types of law. Within countries called common law countries — such as the United Kingdom and the United States — previous cases brought before a judge can create a legal duty. Legislation written by the state, local or county government can also impose a legal duty on individuals within the borders that the law applies to. There are also two general classifications of legal duties: those duties where a breach is criminal and subject to criminal sanctions and those duties where the breach is punishable under civil law. There may be some overlap and certain behaviours may be governed both by criminal and civil law. This means that certain actions may be subject to both civil and criminal penalties. No State Project UK - Vince James

15. Causation is the "causal relationship between conduct and result". That is to say that causation provides a means of connecting conduct with a resulting effect, typically an injury. In criminal law, it is defined as the actus reus (an action) from which the specific injury or other effect arose and is combined with mens rea (a state of mind) to comprise the elements of guilt. Causation is only applicable where a result has been achieved and therefore is immaterial with regard to inchoate offenses. (An inchoate offense is one that is contemplated but not committed). No State Project UK - Vince James

16. PART. 2 No State Project UK - Vince James

17. Civil & Criminal Law Explained No State Project UK - Vince James

18. A “Civil Action” • Is classified into two categories: • Torts • Contract • Criminal Action: is in the nature of a public Tort, the claim being Society or the “Public” has been “harmed” or exposed to “a harm or injury” by a given act or omission.?. No State Project UK - Vince James

19. Civil law (common law) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Civil law courts provide a forum for deciding disputes involving torts (such as accidents, negligence, and libel), contract disputes, The objectives of civil law are different from other types of law. In civil law there is the attempt to right a wrong, honor an agreement, or settle a dispute. If there is a victim, they get compensation, and the person who is the cause of the wrong pays, this being a civilized form of, or legal alternative to, revenge. An action in criminal law does not necessarily preclude an action in civil law in common law countries, and may provide a mechanism for compensation to the victims of crime. Difference from criminal law In many countries such as the USA and UK, criminal law has to prove that a party is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt when a case is sent to court. Civil law operates differently, as the UK standard is only to prove guilt on the basis of a balance of probability. In civil law cases, the "burden of proof" requires the plaintiff to convince the trier of fact (whether judge or jury) of the plaintiff's entitlement to the relief sought. This means that the plaintiff must prove each element of the claim, or cause of action, in order to recover. No State Project UK - Vince James

20. SOURCE: www.otto-graph.com TortA wrong involving a breach of duty, and resulting in an injury to the person or property of another. A tort is distinguished from a breach of a contract in that a tort is a violation of a duty established by law, whereas a breach of contract results from a failure to meet an obligation created by the agreement of the parties No State Project UK - Vince James

21. Source:http://www.investopedia.comDefinition of 'Tort Law'The area of law that covers the majority of all civil lawsuits. Essentially, every claim that arises in civil court with the exception of contractual disputes falls under tort law. The concept of tort law is to redress a wrong done to a person, usually by awarding them monetary damages as compensation.  No State Project UK - Vince James

22. As Lord Goff observed recently: The situation in common law countries, including of course England, is exceptional, in that the common law grew up within a procedural framework uninfluenced by Roman law. The law was categorised by reference to the forms of action, and it was not until the abolition of the forms of action by the Common Law Procedure Act 1852 (15 & 16 Vict c 76) that it became necessary to reclassify the law in substantive terms. The result was that common lawyers did at last separate our law of obligations into contract and tort, though in so doing they relegated quasi-contractual claims to the status of an appendix to the law of contract, thereby postponing by a century or so the development of a law of restitution. Even then, there was no systematic reconsideration of the problem of concurrent claims in contract and tort. We can see the courts rather grappling with unpromising material drawn from the old cases in which liability in negligence derived largely from categories based upon the status of the defendant. In a sense, we must not be surprised; for no significant law faculties were established at our universities until the late 19th century, and so until then there was no academic opinion available to guide or stimulate the judges ... No State Project UK - Vince James

23. Tort v Criminal The distinction between the crime and tort is not in the conduct itself, but in the legal proceedings which follow and the purpose of those proceedings. A person may be both prosecuted by the state and be sued by the victim (plaintiff). The fundamental aim of criminal Law is to reduce certain kinds of conduct by measures which include punishment, deterrence and rehabilitation, whereas the fundamental aim of tort is to compensate the victim.The purpose of civil law is to deal with the private rights and duties of citizensas opposed to administrative law, criminal law, or military law. No State Project UK - Vince James

24. “WHEN” ESTABLISHING A TIMELINE ? ASK HOW, WHY, WERE AND WHEN ANY ALLEGED OBLIGATION OR “DUTY WAS” CREATED? No State Project UK - Vince James

25. Magna Carta, Bill of Rights & ECHR ? No State Project UK - Vince James

26. A Government is an organization within a specific geographic location which is dominant in physical force. Government is necessary to ensure the proper use of force. For this reason, it must specify objective laws to clarify the use of force, and it must have the ability to enforce these laws. The purpose of government is to protect theindividual rights of its citizens. Since rights can be assaulted both within a country or outside of it, the government must deal with either threat. This requires an army for defence of the country, and a police system to protect the individual citizens from other individuals within the country. To ensure that rights are upheld properly, the judgment of the use of force must be objective. Since individuals involved in an incident are not likely to be objective, it is the government's job to judge the individual use of force by its citizens. For this reason, the government must provide a court system. Laws are the tools by which the court decides if a use of force is valid or not. No State Project UK - Vince James

27. Magna Carta, also called Magna CartaLibertatum, is an Englishcharter, originally issued in the year 1215 and reissued later in the 13th century in modified versions. The later versions excluded the most direct challenges to the monarch's authority that had been present in the 1215 charter.The charter first passed into law in 1225; the 1297 version, with the long title (originally in Latin) The Great Charter of the Liberties of England, and of the Liberties of the Forest, still remains on the statute books of England and Wales. Source: Wikpedia No State Project UK - Vince James

28. The 1215 charter required King John of Englandto proclaim certain liberties, and accept that his will was not arbitrary, for example by explicitly accepting that no "freeman" (in the sense of non-serf) could be punished except through the law of the land, a right which is still in existence today.Magna Carta was the first document forced onto an English King by a group of his subjects, the feudal barons, in an attempt to limit his powers by law and protect their privileges. It was preceded and directly influenced by the Charter of Liberties in 1100, in which King Henry I had specified particular areas wherein his powers would be limited. Source Wikipedia No State Project UK - Vince James

29. Source: Wikipedia, Bill of Rights 1689 The Bill of Rights[1] or the Bill of Rights 1688[2] is an Act of the Parliament of England. The Bill of Rights was passed by Parliament on 16 December 1689.[3] It was a restatement in statutory form of the Declaration of Right presented by the Convention Parliament to William and Mary in March 1689 (or 1688 by Old Style dating), inviting them to become joint sovereigns of England. It lays down limits on the powers of sovereign and sets out the rights of Parliament and rules for freedom of speech in Parliament, the requirement to regular elections to Parliament and the right to petition the monarch without fear of retribution. It reestablished the liberty of Protestants to have arms for their defence within the rule of law, and condemned James II of England for "causing several good subjects being Protestants to be disarmed at the same time when papists were both armed and employed contrary to law". These ideas about rights reflected those of the political thinker John Locke and they quickly became popular in England. It also sets out—or, in the view of its drafters, restates—certain constitutional requirements of the Crownto seek the consent of the people, as represented in Parliament. No State Project UK - Vince James

30. "Consent of the governed" is a phrase synonymous with a political theory wherein a government's legitimacy and moral right to use state power is only justified and legal when derived from the people or society over which that political power is exercised. This theory of "consent" is historically contrasted to the divine right of kings and has often been invoked against the legitimacy of colonialism. Article 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that "The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government." Source: Wikipedia No State Project UK - Vince James

31. Does this claim to be a Contract ! If yes Between who !!! No State Project UK - Vince James

32. Our constitutions purport to be established by 'the people,' and, in theory, 'all the people' consent to such government as the constitutions authorize. But this consent of 'the people' exists only in theory. It has no existence in fact. Government is in reality established by the few; and these few assume the consent of all the rest, without any such consent being actually given.   ....... Lysander Spooner No State Project UK - Vince James

33. The Constitution has no inherent authority or obligation. It has no authority or obligation at all, unless as a contract between man and man. And it does not so much as even purport to be a contract between persons now existing. It purports, at most, to be only a contract between persons living eighty years ago. And it can be supposed to have been a contract then only between persons who had already come to years of discretion, so as to be competent to make reasonable and obligatory contracts. Furthermore, we know, historically, that only a small portion even of the people then existing were consulted on the subject, or asked, or permitted to express either their consent or dissent in any formal manner. ......Lysander Spooner, No Treason… No State Project UK - Vince James

34. No State Project UK - Vince James

35. PART. 4 No State Project UK - Vince James

36. The Myth of State & Citizens No State Project UK - Vince James

37. cit·i·zen  (s t -z n) n. 1. A person owing loyalty to and entitled by birth or naturalization to the protection of a state or nation. 2. A resident of a city or town, especially one entitled to vote and enjoy other privileges there. 3. A civilian. 4. A native, inhabitant, or denizen of a particular place: "We have learned to be citizens of the world, members of the human community"(Franklin D. Roosevelt). [Middle English citisein, from Anglo-Norman citesein, alteration (perhaps influenced by dainzain, denizen) of Old French citeain, from cite, city; see city.] cit i·zen·ly adj. Synonyms: citizen, national, subjectThese nouns denote a person owing allegiance to a nation or state and entitled to its protection: an American citizen; a British national; a French subject. No State Project UK - Vince James

38. The Police are here to protect the public...are they? ....Some famous cases. In performing the functions of investigating and preventing crime the police owe no duty do care to an individual member of the public. In such circumstances even were harm was reasonably foreseeable, there is insufficient proximity between the police and the victim. (Hill v. Chief Constable of West Yorkshire (HL, 1988).And Smith v. chief constable of Sussex (2008 ). No State Project UK - Vince James

39. Chief Constable of Hertfordshire v Van Colle (Administrator of the Estate of GC, Deceased) and Another; Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex [2008] UKHL 50 HL (Lord Bingham of Cornhill, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, Lord Carswell, Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood) July 30 2008 ABSTRACT Article 2 does not affect the principle established in Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire (1989) AC 53, namely that, in the absence of special circumstances, the police owed no common law duty of care to protect individuals against harm caused by criminals No State Project UK - Vince James

40. B e f o r e : LORD JUSTICE PILL LORD JUSTICE SEDLEY and LORD JUSTICE RIMER Between: SMITH Appellant - and - CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SUSSEX POLICE Respondent The commission of the peace creates public law duties which can be enforced by mandatory orders[1], but not, by itself, private law duties. Correspondingly, no duty of care is owed by the police to the public at large so as to render them liable to an individual who suffers harm by their neglect. The bedrock of this doctrine is Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire[2], in which the House of Lords held that the estate of a victim of the Yorkshire Ripper, who – it was averred and assumed – would have been caught by competent detective work in time to prevent her murder, had no claim against the police for negligence. There was no relationship between the victim, as a member of the public, and the police capable of giving rise to a duty of care. No State Project UK - Vince James

41. PART.5 No State Project UK - Vince James

42. Conclusion & observations No State Project UK - Vince James

43. “life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” ― Frédéric Bastiat, The Law No State Project UK - Vince James

44. What factually is a “Right” ? No State Project UK - Vince James

45. A “Right” is a “Legal Claim” Source: http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/claim claim 1) v. to make a demand for money, for property, or for enforcement of a right provided by law. 2) n. the making of a demand (assert a claim) for money due, for property, for damages or for enforcement of a right. If such a demand is not honoured, it may result in a lawsuit. In order to enforce a right against a government agency (ranging for damages from a negligent bus driver to a shortage in payroll) a claim must be filed first. If rejected or ignored by the government, it is lawsuit time. No State Project UK - Vince James

46. Q. Did “Rights” exist prior to the creation of “law” ? No State Project UK - Vince James

47. Rights are self defence No State Project UK - Vince James

48. No State Project UK - Vince James

49. What factually is ”Law” ? No State Project UK - Vince James

50. Law is solely the organization of the individual right of self-defense which existed before law was formalized. Frederic Bastiat ( The Law ) No State Project UK - Vince James