1 / 4

Break-Out Session Addressing Gaps

This session focuses on addressing gaps in corporate and community body of knowledge, facilitating information exchange, making existing initiatives bigger, and improving outreach and communication.

huffmanr
Télécharger la présentation

Break-Out Session Addressing Gaps

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Break-Out SessionAddressing Gaps

  2. Recommendations (1/2) • Recom #1. Need to improve corporate & community body of knowledge. Valuable to learn from things that have been done successfully.  Need mechanisms to facilitate exchange of information methods, process & outputs created.  • Recom #2. There is a gap in relation to making existing things that work (such as some initiatives and flagships) bigger in order to achieve the expectations in Strategic Implementation Plan. • Recom #3. Little use and some risks to making a big inventory of gaps. Has to be policy driven in terms of gap analysis, not just scientific gaps. Gap analysis that is in focus here is in terms of gap in activity in relation to GEO objectives and priorities. • Recom #4. Any process around gaps should be connected with users / real clients and companies.

  3. Recommendations (2/2) • Recom #5. There is a gap around outreach & communication. Need to showing opportunities & values to external audiences & also for new members / POs. GEO should market explanatory documents better & provide introductory engagement steps for new members / PO easier (as currently very opaque) • Recom #6. Need to make typology of users more explicit in initiatives & flagships so that users can easily understand "What is it for me?" • Recom #7. Need to address structural gaps through clustering when there are several related activities or when scientific community only addressing part of issue.

More Related