1 / 39

Calculations of single-inclusive cross sections and spin asymmetries in pp scattering

This talk focuses on the general status and progress of calculations for single-inclusive cross sections and spin asymmetries in pp scattering. It discusses topics such as next-to-leading order, resummation, power corrections, and their implications for understanding proton structure and hadronic final states.

hwoolford
Télécharger la présentation

Calculations of single-inclusive cross sections and spin asymmetries in pp scattering

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Calculations of single-inclusive cross sections and spin asymmetries in pp scattering Werner Vogelsang RBRC & BNL Nuclear Theory Spin2004, Trieste Oct. 11

  2. Outline: Talk will focus on general status & progress of calculations, rather than on specific predictions for spin asymmetries etc. • Introduction • Next-to-leading order • Resummation • Power corrections • Conclusions

  3. I. Introduction

  4. High- single-inclusive reactions : • the “next-simplest” observables in pp scattering, after Drell-Yan • short-distance interaction  perturbation theory • important tests of QCD hard scattering, need for higher orders, resummations, power corrections • important insights into proton structure, and into formation of hadronic final states One prime example: at RHIC, to measure

  5. (for pions, additional fragmentation functions)

  6. Ingredients for theoretical framework: • parton distributions / fragmentation functions • higher order QCD corrections  may be particularly sizable in hadronic collisions  reduction in scale dependence  NLO = state of the art  in some cases, all-order resummations of dominant terms • idea about power corrections, e.g., if not so high

  7. II. NLO - successes and failures

  8. NLO calculations for single-inclusive processes : Aurenche et al. ; Baer, Ohnemus, Owens ; Contogouris et al. ; Gordon, WV ; Mukherjee, Stratmann, WV Ellis, Kunszt, Soper; Furman ; Guillet ; … De Florian, Frixione, Signer, WV ; Jäger. Stratmann, WV Aversa et al.; de Florian; Jäger, Schäfer, Stratmann, WV

  9. at RHIC

  10. Spin asymmetries at RHIC (Stratmann, Jäger,WV)

  11. (Stratmann, Jäger,WV) (L = 7/pb, P = 0.4)

  12. at lower energies Apanasevich et al. (see also Aurenche et al.; Bourrely, Soffer)

  13. at lower energies Aurenche et al.

  14.  Why problems in fixed-target regime ? Why “near perfect” at colliders ?  • higher-order corrections beyond NLO ? • power corrections ? (e.g., “intrinsic” as a model. Actually tries to mimic higher orders and power corrections. There is no unique way of implementing it. See Murgia’s talk)

  15. III. Resummation

  16. Threshold resummation Example: prompt photons “threshold” logarithms, associated with soft/coll. gluons

  17. Are these terms relevant ? “parton luminosity”

  18. How dominant are they ?

  19. Sterman; Catani, Trentadue; • exponentiation occurs when Mellin moments in are taken Large terms may be resummed to all orders in

  20. Leading logarithms : • these exponents are positive  enhancement (NLL far more complicated, known: Laenen, Oderda, Sterman; Catani. Mangano, Nason)

  21. Same for inclusive hadrons • expect much larger enhancement ! • important techniques for NLL color exchange : Sen; Kidonakis, Sterman; Bonciani et al. • also, use NLO calculation by Jäger, Schäfer, Stratmann, WV

  22. LO NLO NNLO · · · · · · · · · · · · k N LO LL NLL NNLL • What is the general structure ? Fixed order Resummation

  23. E706 Sterman, WV  Significant reduction in scale dependence ! • resummation compensates soft part of DGLAP evolution  Effects negligible at collider energies

  24. E706 de Florian, WV (note, the resummation is for rapidity-integrated cross section)

  25. WA70

  26. discrepancies for pion production are strongly reduced • colliders: much smaller effects (but watch out for subleading terms) • curious situation: bigger problems between data and NLO for prompt  however, resummation effects larger for pions ! • experimental issues ? • how about power corrections ?

  27. IV. Power Corrections

  28. • singularity in reflected in factorial growth of PT series DY: • ill-defined because of strong-coupling regime •  structure of power corrections from resummation ? • resummed logarithms not associated with factorial growth • regime of very low : • overall powers all even, exponentiating ! Sterman, WV

  29. • closer analysis shows that there are also effects from transverse-momentum resummation connects and to values from analysis ? • for single-inclusive cross sections : • then, • qualitatively, for inclusive hadrons, replace

  30. V. Conclusions

  31. tremendous success of NLO at collider energies • at lower energies: resummation appears crucial large effects for inclusive hadrons reduction of scale dependence will be relevant in many situations ! • beginnings of analysis of power corrections implied by resummation : energy dependence  smaller effects at colliders • a lot of work remains ! resummation: rapidity dependence subleading terms recoil effects at smaller effects on spin asymmetries power corrections: full analysis, global fit ?

  32.  subleading terms important at collider energies

  33. • singular at • Mellin contour chosen as • PT series defined in this way has no factorial growth

  34. Sterman, WV

  35. Sterman, WV

  36. Jäger, Stratmann, WV

  37. Perturbative series :

More Related