1 / 38

Brianna Thorpe Arizona State University

Controls for P olarimeter Converters. Brianna Thorpe Arizona State University. What are we doing?. Experiments at Jefferson Lab use controls for polarimeter converters This minimizes problems in the experiments We want to make a cheap, simple to use control This will require:

hyman
Télécharger la présentation

Brianna Thorpe Arizona State University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Controls for Polarimeter Converters Brianna Thorpe Arizona State University

  2. What are we doing? • Experiments at Jefferson Lab use controls for polarimeter converters • This minimizes problems in the experiments • We want to make a cheap, simple to use control • This will require: • Developing hardware • Writing software

  3. Converter Issues: Electron Scatter • What is this? • As an electron moves through the source, it bumps against other atoms. • Why is this an issue? • As the thickness of the source increases, the ratio of scattering centers to electrons detected increases.

  4. Converter Issue: Delta Rays • What is this? • As an electron travels through the source, it bumps against other atoms. This knocks off other electrons. • Why is this an issue? • These other electrons (Delta rays) hit the detector at angles different than the recoil electron. Because both have similar kinematics, we have no way of knowing which is the recoil electron.

  5. Converter Issues: Our Solution • The Solution: make the target (converter) really thin. • Our converter three different sources: • Beryllium • Slightly thicker Beryllium • Carbon

  6. How Do We Control the Converters?

  7. Distance in beam direction between converter and detector is 35 mm

  8. Detector supports attached to plate with screws

  9. Rack guide supports attached to plate with screws

  10. The Converter Control • Motor • The motor moves the converter tray. • Control the motor and you control the converters. Carbon Converters Thicker Beryllium Beryllium

  11. Step One: The Hardware • We want cheap and simple: • Arduino: Open source electronics • Works with Linux • Programs written in C or C++ • Lots of example code on the internet • Cost: $99

  12. The Arduino board is our microcontroller • Our code tells the Arduino what to do • The Arduino relays our commands to the shields Ethernet Shield Motor shield • Shields: Electronics that are stacked on the microcontroller • Our motor shield speaks to our motor • Cost: $27 • Our Ethernet shield allows for Ethernet communication • Cost: $35 Microcontroller

  13. Hardware Issues: • The Arduino motor shield had a pin conflict with the Ethernet shield • This prevented communication between the shields • Our Solution: • An inexpensive pin-reassignment shield • We used solder to reassign the pins

  14. We hooked our stacked Arduino and shields to a cheap test motor • Bipolar • 200 steps per revolution • 12 Volt • Cost: $20 (including shipping)

  15. Step Two: The Software • Installed on lc64 Linux box • Installed on my Windows laptop • Used example code for testing. • The code for Arduino is called a “sketch” • Compiled using Linux and Windows. We are fully platform independent.

  16. The code to control the motor was written in the Arduino program. • The Graphical User Interface was written in Vpython. • The GUI allows for communication between the sketch and the Arduino

  17. GUI Position: retracted

  18. GUI Position: One

  19. GUI Position: Two

  20. GUI Position: Three

  21. Application at Jefferson Lab The GUI will live here

  22. Cost Effectiveness Total Cost: $5345 Controller: $595 Controller chassis: $4750 Total Cost: $181

  23. Putting it all Together

  24. The Finished Product

  25. Acknowledgments • Dr. Mike Dugger • Dr. Barrie Ritchie • Ross Tucker • Todd Hodges • Ben Prather

  26. Converter Stick assembly • Color code: • → 1.5 mm thick • → 3.0 mm thick • → 1.4 mm thick • Material: Aluminum • All units in mm • Hole 1-3: 8x8 • Hole 4: 8x42 • Screw holes on converter tray are threaded • Weight ~ 0.41 oz 3 16 3 1 Hole 1 16 1 Hole 2 Hole 4 16 42 67 1 Hole 3 16 16 Converter tray Converter plate 8 22 22 1 1

  27. Converter retracted Rack stop Mounting plate Rack Rack stop • Teeth on rack not shown • Converter tray 11 mm from beam center • Converter tray detail shown later Converter leg Converter tray Detector card 11 mm

  28. Converter position 1 176 mm 102 mm 5 mm 10 mm

  29. Converter position 2

  30. Converter position 3

  31. Different view

  32. Front view 10 mm 10 mm 3 mm

  33. View from downstream, detector removed Weight of rack ~ 0.97 oz Weight of arm ~ 0.26 oz Weight of converter tray assembly ~ 0.41 oz → Weight of rack+arm+converter tray assembly = 1.64 oz 91 mm

  34. Gear added • Gear has outer diameter of 15 mm (can be a bit smaller) with a minimum of 18 teeth • Teeth on gear not shown • Precision in linear motion per step (200 steps per revolution is standard for stepper motors): ~1/4 mm

  35. Rack guide added If rack guide is aluminum then coefficient of static friction between rack and rack guide is between 1.05 and 1.35. Using 1.35 as conservative estimate of coefficient of static friction, then the force needed to break static equilibrium is 1.35*1.64 oz ~ 2.2 oz

  36. Motor added Since gear has radius of 7.5 mm (~ 0.3 inch) and force needed to break static friction is 2.2 oz, then minimum torque required of motor is ~ 0.7 oz-inch Motor that I’m interested in has holding torque of 7.5 oz-inch Motor details shown later.

  37. Motor mount added Motor mount attached to plate with screws (not shown) Want two cm clearance between upstream chamber wall and motor Upstream

More Related