1 / 13

RJ Principles in Action

RJ Principles in Action. Alternative CJS Sentencing and Corrections Policies. RJ Principles in Action. Circle Sentencing by Judge Barry D. Stuart Victim-Offender Reconciliation Project Canadian Native Justice Committees Satisfying Justice: Safe Community Options

hyman
Télécharger la présentation

RJ Principles in Action

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RJ Principles in Action Alternative CJS Sentencing and Corrections Policies

  2. RJ Principles in Action • Circle Sentencing by Judge Barry D. Stuart • Victim-Offender Reconciliation Project • Canadian Native Justice Committees • Satisfying Justice: Safe Community Options • Supreme Court of Canada – “reorientation” in sentencing policy • Youth Justice Act

  3. 1. Circle Sentencing Principles1 • Crime is only part of a larger conflict • Sentence is only part of the solution • Focus is on present and future conduct

  4. 1. Circle Sentencing Principles (con't)1 • Holistic view of behaviour • Social conflict • Process shapes the relationship among all parties

  5. 2. Victim-offender reconciliation project • Also known as VORP, 1974 • Initiated in the Kitchener, Ontario probation department and Mennonite Central Committee almost by chance • Two young men went to houses and businesses to apologize and offer to pay for damages.

  6. 2. Victim-offender … (con't) • Today over 200 jurisdictions offer VORP • It offers a person who has been harmed a chance to meet with the person responsible for the harm. • A mediator, often volunteer from community, arranges the meeting. • The intent is to help those involved heal, reconcile, and maybe even bring closure to the events.

  7. 3. Canadian Native Justice Committees • Acting as advisory bodies, 1996 • Mandate is to recommend appropriate punishments for offenders to a judge • Not real restorative alternative

  8. 4. Satisfying Justice: Safe Community Options • Canadian Correctional Service funded the Church Council on Justice and Corrections’ conference and compilation of restorative programs in Canada, 2000 • Listing of community-based responses to crime

  9. 4. Satisfying Justice (con't) • “It is our hope that an emerging experience of satisfying justice, as symbolized through the wholeness of circle, will steadily gain ground over the bars of imprisonment.” by John Edwards, Commissioner, Correctional Service of Canada

  10. 5. "Reorientation" in Sentence Policy • Supreme Court of Canada – “reorientation” in sentencing policy by R. v. Gladue, 1999 • Criminal Code s. 718.2(e) on sentencing of aboriginal people • Parliament’s choice to include (e) and (f) [i.e. to provide reparations for harm done to victims or to the community; and to promote a sense of responsibility in offenders, and acknowledgment of the harm done to victims and to the community.] alongside the traditional sentencing goals must be understood as evidencing an intention to expand the parameters of the sentencing analysis for all offenders.  • The principle of restraint expressed in s. 718.2(e) will necessarily be informed by this re‑orientation.

  11. 6. Youth Criminal Justice Act • Bill C-7, the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA), 2002 • Replaces the Young Offenders Act (YOA) as of April 1, 2003 • Highlights include: • Communities and families should work in partnership with others to prevent youth crime by addressing its underlying causes, responding to the needs of young persons and providing guidance and support. • The youth justice system should take account of the interests of victims and ensure accountability through meaningful consequences and rehabilitation and reintegration. • The youth justice system should reserve its most serious interventions for the most serious crimes and reduce the over-reliance on incarceration.

  12. Reference • Griffiths, Curt T.. Canadian Criminal Justice: A Primer. Toronto: Nelson, 2007: 275-276 • Sullivan, Dennis, and Larry Tifft. Restorative Justice: Healing the Foundations of Our Everyday Lives. Monsey: Willow Tree Pr, 2001: 71-75 • Nielsen, M.O. A comparison of developmental ideologies: Navajo Nation Peacemaker Courts and Canadian Native Justice Committees. In B. Galaway & J. Hudson (Eds.), Restorative justice: International perspectives (pp. 207-223). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press. • "Satisfying Justice (a Compendium of Initiatives, Programs and Legislative Measures) - Publications - Correctional Service of Canada." Correctional Service of Canada Welcome Page | Service correctionnel du Canada Page d'accueil. 1 July 1996. 26 Mar. 2008 <http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/pblct/stisfy/index-eng.shtml>.

  13. Reference (con't) • "Supreme Court of Canada - Decisions - R. v. Gladue." Supreme Court of Canada - Decisions - . 23 Apr. 1999. 26 Mar. 2008 <http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999rcs1-688/1999rcs1-688.html>. "Bill C-3: The Youth Criminal Justice Act (LS-356E)." Parliament of Canada - Parlement du Canada. 21 Feb. 2000. 26 Mar. 2008 <http://www.parl.gc.ca/36/2/parlbus/chambus/house/bills/summaries/c3-e.htm>. • "Bill C-3: The Youth Criminal Justice Act (LS-356E)." Parliament of Canada - Parlement du Canada. 21 Feb. 2000. 26 Mar. 2008 <http://www.parl.gc.ca/36/2/parlbus/chambus/house/bills/summaries/c3-e.htm>.

More Related