SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Fuzzy Logic Placement

ianthe avatar
7 diapositives · 256 Views · Aug 28, 2014

Fuzzy Logic Placement. Emily Blem ECE556 Final Project December 14, 2004. Reference: E. Kang, R.B. Lin, and E. Shragowitz. “Fuzzy Logic Approach to VLSI Placement.” IEEE Trans. On VLSI Systems . V. 2, No. 4. December 1994. Objectives.

Fuzzy Logic Placement - slide 1
01 / 7Fuzzy Logic Placement
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Fuzzy Logic Placement
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Fuzzy Logic Placement Emily Blem ECE556 Final Project December 14, 2004 Reference: E. Kang, R.B. Lin, and E. Shragowitz. “Fuzzy Logic Approach to VLSI Placement.” IEEE Trans. On VLSI Systems. V. 2, No. 4. December 1994.

  2. Objectives • Multiple placement objectives: timing, chip size, interconnection length, etc. • Need a framework in which to resolve multiple objectives • Not well addressed by most algorithms

  3. Methods(1) • Fuzzy set: a group of objects with different levels of membership • Objects may partially belong to a set • Operations: m1andm2 = max(m1, m2) m1orm2 = min(m1, m2) (image from Kang et. al. 1994)

  4. Methods (2) • Can be applied to iterative or constructive design • In an iterative design, reduce number of criteria for each objective to 1 or 2 due to time constraints • Constructive algorithm: • Top level: place cells in feasible regions based on timing requirements • Middle level: assign cells to feasible intervals • Bottom level: assign each cell to a position within its feasible interval • Assignment completed row by row based on fuzzy logic decision maker (FZDM)

  5. Methods(3) • Small chip area rules: • If a candidate cell provides good utilization of existing feed through pins and a small # of rows is used for each net connected to it, then a small # of feed through cells will be added • If a candidate cell adds a small # of feed through cells and produces almost equal row length, then small chip area will be generated • For large designs, criterion 1/2/1 has a not so strong preference over criterion 1/2/2 • In early stages of placement, criterion 1/2/1/1 has a strong preference over criterion 1/2/1/2 • In middle stages of placement, criterion 1/2/1/2 has a mild preference over criterion 1/2/1/1

  6. Results • Ability to tune solution a key feature of fuzzy placement • In paper, (balanced) fuzzy placement consistently outperformed TimberWolf6.1 and OASIS using same routers after placement (data from Kang et. al. 1994)

  7. Conclusions • FZDM avoids issues of greedy placer in constructive placement • In iterative placement, CPU time issues make FZDM into a weighted cost function • According to paper, achieves impressive results • Fuzzy logic structure makes it easy to tune solution for different goals and achieve multiple objectives