1 / 35

2013 CDC/GTPAC Small Business Industry Day

2013 CDC/GTPAC Small Business Industry Day. Dale DeFilipps. Contracts Branch Manager Centers for Disease Control and Prevention May 3, 2013. Office of the Director. Procurement and Grants Office (PGO). Agenda. Contract Summary CDC Information Management Services Awardees

ilar
Télécharger la présentation

2013 CDC/GTPAC Small Business Industry Day

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2013 CDC/GTPAC Small Business Industry Day Dale DeFilipps Contracts Branch Manager Centers for Disease Control and Prevention May 3, 2013 Office of the Director Procurement and Grants Office (PGO)

  2. Agenda • Contract Summary • CDC Information Management Services Awardees • Small Business Processes • Technical Evaluations

  3. Contract summary

  4. Contract Summary • CDC Information Management Services • Covers three domains • Information management • IT infrastructure • Management consulting • Has three award categories by business type • Full and open • Small business • 8(a) – Small and disadvantaged businesses • Period of performance can last 10 years if all options are exercised • Comprises 27 prime contractors • 55 awards • Over 150 named sub-contractors/partners

  5. Contract Summary • CDC Information Management Services (continued) • Total value is $5 billion • $3 billion for information management • $1 billion for IT infrastructure • $1 billion for management consulting • Scope and coverage • Can be used by any office in CDC, as well as other HHS Operational Divisions • Cannot be used by other federal agencies outside of HHS • Covers work for CDC’s intergovernmental grantees, such as state, local and international health agencies • Not a requirements contract within CDC, but program officials are strongly encouraged to use it

  6. Information Management Domain • Other Tasks include: • Requirements gathering • Analysis • System prototyping • Conversion • Implementation • Training • Development of user guides • Change control • System testing • Systems security controls • Quality assurance • Information Systems Tasks • Planning • Design • Development • Maintenance • Engineering • Integration • Retirement

  7. Information Management Domain • Domain Tasks include: • Data standards development • Health IT • Public health informatics • Decision support • Data modeling • Interoperability services • Health information exchanges • Service-oriented architecture • Software-specific tasks • Improvements • Modeling • Simulation • Security assessments • Privacy assessments • Monitoring

  8. Information Management Domain • Data Specific Tasks • Collection • Analysis • Transformation • Dissemination • Visualization • Management

  9. IT Infrastructure Domain • Domain Tasks include: • Design • Installation • Management of networks • Support of networks • Datacenter operations • Information security systems • Conferencing • Project management and program support services to support IT infrastructure programs and activities

  10. Management Consulting Domain • Broad consulting services including: • Business analysis • Business case development • Performance management • Process improvement • Business process reengineering • Decision support and analytics • Program vulnerability and risk assessment • Continuity of operations planning • Project and program management

  11. Management Consulting Domain • Additional consulting services include: • Capital planning and portfolio assessment • Enterprise architecture • Strategic planning • Organizational study and design • Transformation and change management • Human capital and workforce analysis • Training • Communications • Governance support

  12. Contract Summary • Broad and flexible scope • Provides access to diversified talent • Many specialty labor categories • Facilitates small business goals • Performance-based focus • Fosters contractor work off-site • Explicitly enables teleworking • Government issued equipment not required, but allowed

  13. CDC Information Management Services Awardees

  14. CIMS Awardees • Full list by category posted on FBO.gov website • Each domain and business category has 2-11 awardees • Substantial involvement of small businesses • Small business and 8(a) companies receive first consideration for Requests for Task Order Proposals (RFTOPs)

  15. Award Distributions • Typically 3 to 4 proposals are received on average for each RFTOP • Number of Task Order Awards by Business Type • 55% to large businesses • 45% to small businesses • Dollar Obligations by Business Type • 70% of dollars awarded to large businesses, • 30% of dollars awarded to small businesses

  16. CIMS AwardeesInformation Management Domain • Full and Open Business Category • Accenture National Security Services, LLC • Booz Allen Hamilton • Business Computer Applications • Deloitte Consulting LLP • Dell Perot Systems • IBM • ICF Incorporated, LLC • Lockheed Martin • Northrop Grumman • Science Applications • International Corp. • SRA International, Inc.

  17. CIMS AwardeesInformation Management Domain • Small Business Set-Aside Category • Business Computer Applications • DB Consulting Group, Inc. • Emergint Technologies, Inc. • 8(a) Set-Aside Category • DB Consulting Group, Inc. • Emergint Technologies, Inc.

  18. CIMS AwardeesIT Infrastructure Domain • Full and Open Business Category • Accenture National Security Services, LLC • Booz Allen Hamilton • CACI • Ciber, Inc. • CSC • Dell Perot Systems • HP Enterprise Services, LLC • IBM • Lockheed Martin • Northrop Grumman • Unisys

  19. CIMS AwardeesIT Infrastructure Domain • Small Business Set-Aside Category • Amdex • Emergint Technologies, Inc. • Human Touch, LLC • 8(a) Set-Aside Category • Chickasaw • Emergint Technologies, Inc. • Human Touch, LLC

  20. CIMS AwardeesManagement Consulting Domain • Full and Open Business Category • Booz Allen Hamilton • CSC • Deloitte Consulting LLP • IBM • ICF Incorporated, LLC • Lockheed Martin • Price Waterhouse Coopers LLP • Sapient • SRA International, Inc. • Unisys

  21. CIMS AwardeesManagement Consulting Domain • Small Business Set-Aside Category • Amdex • Cadence Group Associates, Inc. • Carter Consulting, Inc. • SciMetrika • 8(a) Set-Aside Category • Carter Consulting, Inc. • Cloudburst Consulting Group • SciMetrika • Total Solutions, Inc.

  22. Small business processes

  23. Small Business Processes • Capability statements • Make a recommendation to set-aside the RFTOP for either 8(a), small business, or full and open competition • Reviewed and evaluated by technical subject matter experts • Small Business Specialists review RFTOPs and provide input regarding the set-aside decision • Contracting Officer makes the final set-aside decision

  24. Small Business Processes • If small business awardees are not still small after five years from contract award, then they cannot compete for work under the CIMS contract • CDC on-ramping solicitation amendment issued • Solicitation will be set-aside for 8(a), HubZone, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), and Woman Owed Small Business (WOSB) • Historically received the lowest percentage of dollar obligations at CDC • Solicitation amendment released April 2013, proposals due early June 2013

  25. Small Business Processes • CDC on-ramping solicitation amendment issued (continued) • Solicitation amendment covers only the information management domain • It is the most active of the three domains • The other two domains will not be solicited • Offerors can check FedBizOpps.gov for more details • Provisions in the new solicitation amendment are the same or very similar to the original solicitation

  26. Proposal preparation

  27. Proposal Preparation • Be sure to thoroughly read and comprehend the… • Statement of work requirements • Proposal instructions • Evaluation criteria • Do not merely restate the work requirements • Offerors need to provide details of their own technical approach and how they plan on accomplishing the work • Perform mathematical verification of numerical data before submitting the proposal

  28. Proposal Preparation • Be sure that the following items are reasonable and appropriate for the proposed technical effort and associated work requirements • Labor hours • Categories • Rates • Other direct costs • Ensure your proposal is received by the deadline date and time • If you have questions, submit them in writing to the Contracting Officer

  29. Technical evaluations

  30. Technical Evaluations • Technical Evaluation Panel • Separate panel for each RFTOP • Different individuals on each panel depending on the requirements • Comprised of program office subject matter experts • Rates the proposals in accordance with the evaluation criteria in the individual RFTOP • Provides an average of the panel member scores • Come to a consensus agreement on their ratings and award recommendation

  31. Technical Evaluations • Contracting Officer reviews the evaluations before deciding on which offeror to select • Take technical merit and price into account in the best value tradeoff • All task order awards over $5 million are thoroughly reviewed by several high level procurement officials before award • Team Leader, • Branch Chief, • Policy Manager, • Deputy Director, and • Head of the Contracting Activity

  32. Technical Evaluations • The government reserves the right to make an award without discussions • An offeror’s initial submission should be their best proposal • Do not expect that the government will request revised proposals to address weaknesses • Annual past performance on existing task orders will be evaluated for entry into Contracting Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) • Past performance will not be included as an evaluation factor for RFTOPs

  33. Health Marketing Communication Services • We have begun acquisition planning to make follow-on awards to the existing Health Marketing Communication contracts • We plan on issuing a Request for Information (RFI) in the fourth quarter of FY 2013 with awards expected in late 2014 • Currently there are 23 contractors among three domains including creative services, evaluations, and training • All task orders are competed among the contractors in the applicable domain • All task orders are performance based

  34. Health Marketing Communication Services • On average, over 30 new competitive task orders are awarded each fiscal year • The contracts can be used HHS-wide by any Operating Division, but cannot be used by other Federal agencies • The new contracts will have a small business set aside component depending on the results of our market research

  35. Questions and Answers

More Related