1 / 23

Department of English & Foreign Languages

Department of English & Foreign Languages. B.A. in English CIP Code: 23.0101 Program Code: 120. Student-Learning Outcomes. 1. Students will be able to think and read critically. 2. Students will be able to apply literary theory.

Télécharger la présentation

Department of English & Foreign Languages

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Department of English & Foreign Languages B.A. in English CIP Code: 23.0101 Program Code: 120 Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011

  2. Student-Learning Outcomes 1. Students will be able to think and read critically. 2. Students will be able to apply literary theory. 3. Students will be able to conduct electronic as well as traditional research and be able to word process. 4. Students are knowledgeable about movements in literary history. 5. Students are knowledgeable about a diversity of literary traditions and genres. 6. Students are knowledgeable about the coding of diversity in literary texts. 7. Students will be able to write well, with an understanding of rhetorical situation. 8. Students will be able to write creatively, with competence in poetry and prose. Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011

  3. Alignment of Outcomes • Mission Statement. • Critical Thinking—Life-Long Learning • Cultural Awareness • Diversity • Marketable Writing and Research Skills • Plan 2013 • Cultural Leadership • Diversity • Research Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011

  4. Measures of Learning and Service Outcomes • Student Portfolio (Direct Measure) • Literary History Exam (Direct Measure) 3. Analysis and Interpretation Exam (Direct Measure; under revision) 4. Mid-program Conference (Intervention Strategy) Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011

  5. 2009 Action Plan Update:Item 1 (Monitor Objective 6) Score slipped in 2008-2009 Improved dramatically in 2009-2010 Possibly result of increased emphasis from 2-3 years ago Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 5

  6. 2009 Action Plan Update:Item 2 (More Writing Instruction in Upper-Division Classes) Did implement Scores did improve this year Too early to tell if it’s a direct result of additional instruction Program Quality Improvement Report 2009-2010 Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 6 6

  7. 2009 Action Plan Update:Item 3 (Monitor Objective 8) Scores down for last two years Scores slightly up this year May be the impact of Intro to Creative Writing Program Quality Improvement Report 2009-2010 Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 7 7

  8. Student-Learning Outcome 4 Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 8

  9. Objective 4. Students will be knowledgeable about movements in literary history. Outcome 4:Portfolio Data Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011

  10. Outcome 4:Portfolio Trend Analysis Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011

  11. Outcome 4:Literary History Exam Results Program Quality Improvement Report 2009-2010 Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 11

  12. Literary History Exam Trend Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011

  13. Outcome 4:Action Plan Continue to stress connection between literature and culture in survey courses Teach test taking skills more explicitly in upper-division courses Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011

  14. Student-Learning Outcome 6 14 Program Quality Improvement Report 2009-2010 Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 14

  15. Outcome 6:Portfolio Data Objective 6. Student will be knowledgeable about the coding of diversity in literary texts. Program Quality Improvement Report 2009-2010 Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 15

  16. Outcome 6:Portfolio Trend Analysis Program Quality Improvement Report 2009-2010 Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 16

  17. Outcome 6:Action Plan Continue to give assignments related to diversity issues Continue to monitor for improvement Program Quality Improvement Report 2009-2010 Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 17

  18. Student-Learning Outcome 8 18 Program Quality Improvement Report 2009-2010 Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 18

  19. Outcome 8:Portfolio Data Program Quality Improvement Report 2009-2010 Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 19

  20. Outcome 8:Trend Analysis Program Quality Improvement Report 2009-2010 Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 20

  21. Outcome 8:Action Plan Continue to require all students to take Intro to Creative Writing Continue to monitor Program Quality Improvement Report 2009-2010 Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011 21

  22. Ancillary Actions(Optional) • Revise Literary Analysis and Interpretation Exam • Develop separate benchmarks for Literary History and Creative Writing students re Outcomes 4 & 8 • Additional training to ensure greater inter-rater reliability (norming session) Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011

  23. Published information on graduates Program Quality Improvement Report 2010-2011

More Related