1 / 63

Class 2 Measurement Terminology and Locating Measures October 6, 2005

Class 2 Measurement Terminology and Locating Measures October 6, 2005. Anita L. Stewart Institute for Health & Aging University of California, San Francisco. From Last Week. Some information based on last week’s discussion On weights and values

iman
Télécharger la présentation

Class 2 Measurement Terminology and Locating Measures October 6, 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Class 2Measurement Terminology andLocating MeasuresOctober 6, 2005 Anita L. Stewart Institute for Health & Aging University of California, San Francisco

  2. From Last Week • Some information based on last week’s discussion • On weights and values • Does cognitive functioning reflect physical health?

  3. Implicit and Explicit “Weighting” • Description (describe health states) • Valuation (mapping those health states onto a set of values) • Most measures use “implicit” values • Utility or preference measures represent “explicit” values Kind P. Values and valuation in the measurement of HRQoL, in P Fayerset al (eds) Assessing quality of life in clinical trials, 2nd ed, Oxford, 2005

  4. Example of “Implicit” Weighting: Number of Items per Domain in 3 MOS Indexes

  5. Example of “Implicit” Weighting: Percent of Items per Domain in 3 MOS Indexes

  6. Correlations of MOS Long Form Measures with Physical and Mental Health Hays RD and Stewart AL, The structure of self-reported health inchronic disease patients, Psychol Assessment, 1990;2:22-30.

  7. Overview of Class 2 • Measurement terminology • Confusion, variation, and overlap • Types of response scales, contribution to concept definition • Measurement models • Depicting structure of measures • Locating measures

  8. Measurement • Assignment of numbers to aspects of objects or events according to a rule • Assignment of numbers to an unobservable characteristic of individuals (construct)

  9. Construct, Concept, Variable, Latent Trait, Latent Variable • Terms defined differently by different investigators/authors • Meaning is very similar • considerable overlap among them, • Often used interchangeably

  10. Construct/Concept • A variable that is relatively abstract as opposed to concrete and is defined or operationalized in terms of observed indicators • An idea developed or constructed through informed scientific theory. Concepts that are directly or indirectly observable. • An abstraction based on observations of certain behaviors or characteristics (e.g. pain, stress)

  11. Latent Trait, Factor • Latent - present but not visible, unobservable • Latent trait - unobservable set of characteristics that can be empirically inferred and estimated through answers to a set of questions(Medical Care glossary) • Factor - a latent variable or theoretical construct operationalized in terms of associations among indicators in a factor analysis(Stewart and Ware, 1992 glossary)

  12. Latent Variable, Manifest Variable • Latent variable - unobservable latent trait given a label • Manifest variable is the “observed” information, i.e., the answers to items used to infer the latent trait

  13. Domain, Dimension, Sub-domain, Component • Domain: a state, attitude, perception, behavior, or other sphere of action or thought related to health …. All entities in a single domain have some property in common …. (Patrick & Erickson, 1993) • Dimension: a distinct component of a multidimensional construct that can be theoretically or empirically specified (e.g., physical and mental health)(Stewart & Ware, 1992, glossary)

  14. Example: Dimension, Component, Sub-domain • Mental health (dimension) • Psychological distress (component) • Depression (sub-domain) • Anxiety • Psychological well-being • Positive affect • Sense of belonging

  15. Components of Domains of MOS Long-form Measures • Role Role limitations due to:Functioning -- physical health -- emotional problems • Social Social limitations due to healthFunctioning Sexual problems Family functioning Marital functioning • Pain Pain severity Effects of pain Days with pain

  16. Multidimensional and Unidimensional • A multidimensional “measure” or “instrument” provides several scores • A “profile” of scores • Unidimensional measure - all items measure only one concept • Only one score is obtained • Dimensionality must be empirically tested • e.g., factor analysis identifies one factor,or more than one factor

  17. Example of Multidimensional Instrument • Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) • 55 items, 18 subscales, e.g. • Access to care • Technical quality • Interpersonal manner • Explanations • Continuity of care Marshall, GN Psychological Assessment, 5:477-483, 1993

  18. Example of Unidimensional Measure • Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) • 14 items, subjective experiences of stress • felt confident could handle life’s problems • able to control irritations in your life • difficulties piling up so high, could not overcome them • Single score from all items Cohen, S, J Health Soc Behav 24:385-396, 1983

  19. Instrument, Profile, Battery, Measure, Questionnaire, Survey, Tool, Inventory • Instrument - typically refers to a published, named measure or set of measures • Profile - same, but all scores on the same metric and can be compared (0-100 scales) • Battery (of independent measures) • collection of measures from diverse sources • Measure - single- or multi-item scale or index (umbrella term)

  20. Example of a Multidimensional Profile Instrument: SF-36 Measures 8 health concepts (36 items): • Physical functioning • Role limitations due to physical health • Role limitations due to emotional problems • Social functioning • Pain • Vitality (energy/fatigue) • Mental health • Health perceptions

  21. Generic vs. Disease-Specific Approaches • Generic • Applicable across many conditions anddiseases (e.g., sleep, health perceptions, fatigue, pain) • Disease-specific • Specific to particular disease or condition(e.g., arthritis, cancer, depression) • Generic approach (e.g., general dexterity scale for arthritis study) • Specific (nausea due to chemotherapy, back pain)

  22. Generic or Disease Specific bySingle Domain, Profile, or Index

  23. Questionnaire, Survey, Tool, Inventory • Questionnaire - any of the above formatted into a “questionnaire” or set of measures • Survey - same as questionnaire • Tool = Questionnaire = Survey? • Inventory?

  24. Examples of Names of “Instruments” • SF-36 Short Form Health Survey • Beck Depression Inventory • Health Assessment Questionnaire • Sickness Impact Profile • Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale

  25. Example of a Battery • A survey for a particular study containing the following measures/instruments: • SF-36 (8 domains) • Perceived stress scale (1 domain) • Social support survey (4 domains) • Pain measure • Typical in clinical trials, epidemiological studies • Each measure serves particular purpose (outcome, predictor, mediator, covariate)

  26. Measure, Scale, Index, Item • Measure - single- or multi-item scale or index (umbrella term) • Scale - aggregation of items from one concept or domain, scored according to an accepted scaling method • Index - aggregation of 2 or more scales into a summary score • Item - a single question or statement including its response scale

  27. Item • Consists of an item stem and a response scale or response choices • Item stem – • The question or statement • Response scale or choices – • Answers presented to a respondent with which to respond to a (closed-ended) question

  28. Example of a Response Scale How often have you felt tired inthe past week?1 Never 2 Once or twice 3 A few times 4 Fairly often 5 Very often Itemstem Response scale

  29. Response Choice Formats • Verbal descriptors of all levels • Verbal descriptors of endpoints only • Verbal descriptors of endpoints plus midpoint • Visual analogue scales: 10cm line with endpoints labeled

  30. Format: Verbal Descriptors of All Levels 1 - All of the time 2 - Most of the time 3 - Some of the time 4 - A little of the time 5 - None of the time

  31. Vague, Imprecise Quantifiers • How often? • very often, pretty often, not too often • Sometimes, often, never • How much? • Too little, about right, too much • Below average, average, above average Bradburn NM, Vague quantifiers. Public Opinion Quart 1979, 92-101.

  32. Intensity Scales – “How distressed have you been?” • Not at all, slightly, moderately, quite a bit, extremely • Not at all, a little, a fair amount, much, very much • Not at all, a little, fairly, quite, very, extremely • Not at all, a little, somewhat, very much

  33. 1 - Never 2 - Once or twice 3 - A few times 4 - Often 1 – Never 2 - Hardly ever 3 - Some days 4 - Most days 5 - Almost every day 6 - Always, every day “How Often” Response Scales

  34. 1 - Never 2 - Almost never 3 - Sometimes 4 - Fairly often 5 - Very often 6 - Always 1 - Once or twice 2 - A few times 3 - Fairly often 4 - Very often 5 - Almost every day 6 - Every day “How Often” Response Scales

  35. Format: Verbal Descriptors of Endpoints Only 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 No Pain painas bad as you can imagine

  36. Format: Verbal Descriptors of Endpoints with Midpoint Labeled Very Very much 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 much worse No better change

  37. Format: Verbal Descriptors of Endpoints with Midpoint Labeled -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 Very No Very much change much worse better

  38. Format: Visual Analogue Scale, 10 cm Line No Pain pain as bad as you can imagine

  39. Optimal Number of Response Choices • Are 100 levels better than 5 or 10? • 5-points is probably optimal for respondents • Especially if items will be combined into multi-item scales • For single-item measures • 7 points may be preferred • Allows distribution over 5 points since peopleseldom use endpoints • Hard to come up with labels for 7-point scales

  40. Format: Verbal Descriptors of Endpoints Only 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 No Pain pain as bad as you can imagine

  41. Magic Number 7 + 2 • George Miller determined that 7 “chunks” of information is the most that short-term memory can retain • Plus or minus two (5-9 possible) • Seven (+ 2) is also the most points that people can discriminate along a continuum • Principle has held up well in measurement Miller, GM Psychological Bulletin, 63:81-97, 1956

  42. 1 - Not at all active 2 - A little bit active 3 - Moderately active 4 - Quite active 5 - Extremely active 1 - Not at all active 2 - A little active 3 - Fairly active 4 - Quite active 5 - Very active 6 - Extremely active Can You Make a 7-point Intensity Scale? (How physically active were you this week?)

  43. Measurement Models • The dimensional structure of a measure in terms of how the items related to the constructs (latent traits, factors, concepts) • Can be depicted as a list or visually • Standard visual format for structural equation modeling (SEM)

  44. Measurement Models • Physical Functioning (4 items) • Psychological Distress (7 items)

  45. Measurement Model (List format) • Physical Functioning defined in terms of: • Walking • Climbing stairs • Bending • Reaching

  46. Measurement Model (Visual format) Physical Functioning Reaching Climbing Stairs Bending Walking

  47. Measurement Model (List format) • Psychological distress • Depression • Sad • Lost interest • Can’t get going • Anxiety • Restless • Nervous

  48. Measurement Model (Visual format) Psychological Distress Depression Anxiety Sad Lost interest Can’t get going Restless Nervous

  49. What’s in a Label? • Don’t be fooled

  50. Content Areas: Four Depression Measures

More Related