1 / 24

The unfolded protein response signals through high-order assembly of Ire1

The unfolded protein response signals through high-order assembly of Ire1. Alexei V. Korennykh 1 , 3 , Pascal F. Egea 1 , Andrei A. Korostelev 4 , Janet Finer-Moore 1 , Chao Zhang 2 , 3 , Kevan M. Shokat 2 , 3 , Robert M. Stroud 1 & Peter Walter 1 , 3 Alysia Birkholz 1.15.2010.

iman
Télécharger la présentation

The unfolded protein response signals through high-order assembly of Ire1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The unfolded protein response signals through high-order assembly of Ire1 Alexei V. Korennykh1,3, Pascal F. Egea1, Andrei A. Korostelev4, Janet Finer-Moore1, Chao Zhang2,3, Kevan M. Shokat2,3, Robert M. Stroud1 & Peter Walter1,3 Alysia Birkholz 1.15.2010

  2. ~33% of proteins fold in the ER • Need a mechanism to detect misfolded proteins • UPR • Ire1 is the crucial factor • Has been shown to dimerize • Organized into UPR induced foci • RNase • Trans-autophosphorylation • Binding of ADP

  3. Ire1 “This pathway is really a sort of duckbilled platypus. There have been so many surprises.” - Feroz Papa UCSF • Inositol-requiring protein-1 • ER-membrane-resident kinase/RNase • a non-spliceosomal mRNA splicing reaction • In yeast HAC1 mRNA • HAC1p proteins are then translated • In metazoans, Xbp1 mRNA • Xbp1 proteins are then translated • These proteins adjust protein folding

  4. In stressed cells, IRE-1 binds to unfolded proteins, dimerizes and trans-autophosphorylates in kinase domain This activates the RNase domain which splices XBP1 or HAC1 The spliced form of these genes leads to activation of the UPR BIOC/MCB 568 -- University of Arizona

  5. Activation of Ire1 by self-association. Oligomerization has been suggested to promote the activation the kinase and RNase domains Binding sites of Ire1 in metazoans (right) and yeast (left)

  6. Aim • Authors didn’t like the proposed model that had the activation loops too far away for trans-autophosphorylation • Previous model had no linker component • A different Ire1 dimer is needed for the trans-autophosphorylation

  7. RNase activity assay: Construct cleaved is labeled with P32 and is derived from Xbp1 mRNA

  8. Linker controls the oligomerization Oligomerization is inhibited by increasing salt concentrations- repressing RNase activity

  9. Ire1KR32 shows fold increase in speed of cleavage

  10. Structure of the oligomer • Difficult to crystalize • ADP association wasn’t working • Tried using kinase inhibitors – insert into ADP binding site Kinase inhibitors actually activated the RNase activity

  11. Resolution of crystals

  12. Initially got a Ire1- APY29 complex of 3.9 A • When they deleted 28 amino acids forming a loop, got a resolution of 3.2 A

  13. Electron density map for APY29 bound to IRE1KR32Δ28 3 possible hydrogen bonds formed Although APY29 fits in the ADP site reasonably well, it doesn’t have the divalent Mg 2+ RNase activity of APY29 doesn’t change with addition of EDTA

  14. 14 Ire molecules formed a crystal lattice with back to back dimers

  15. Double Helix

  16. Why is this model attractive? • Kinasedimers are side by side, making trans-autophosphorylation more logical • Kinase inactivating mutant caused no phosphorylation to occur, indicating phosphorylation activity is regulated through self • Phosphorylation sites are on activation loops which face IF3c • IF3c proposed to transfer phosphates

  17. Do all three interfaces control RNase activity? Four monomers combined Contacts within the different interfaces Single monomer

  18. The mechanism • Initially showed that the IreKR32 seemed to show preference for double stem loop mRNA • To look at this, generated a 354 ntd RNA with a single stem loop, and a 58 ntd RNA with a double stem loop

  19. The mechanism Ire1 has no preference for single or double loops

  20. Localization of Helix loop helix near IF2 interface (dimerization interface) – may control RNase activity Cavity is created that is characteristic for substrate binding pockets of enzymes

  21. Model

  22. Conclusions • Old model is incomplete • Ire1 kinase, Rnase, and partial linker forms a supermolecular structure • Co-factor binding and phosphorylation enhance self-association of Ire1 but neither is required • Linkers are necessary for oligomerization

  23. Future work • Although the authors used an increased structure for crystallization, we are still missing the full structure • Need to have evidence that these supermolecular structures are actually present in in vitro/ in vivo models ?

More Related