html5-img
1 / 130

Developing an Atomic Theory

Developing an Atomic Theory. Part 2. The Quantum Experience. Review. Democritus developed the first atomic theory. Review. Democritus developed the first atomic theory. around 400 B.C. Review. Democritus developed the first atomic theory. around 400 B.C. descriptive not functional.

inara
Télécharger la présentation

Developing an Atomic Theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Developing an Atomic Theory • Part 2 The Quantum Experience

  2. Review • Democritus developed the first atomic theory.

  3. Review • Democritus developed the first atomic theory. • around 400 B.C.

  4. Review • Democritus developed the first atomic theory. • around 400 B.C. • descriptive not functional

  5. Review • Democritus (400 B.C.)

  6. Review • Democritus (400 B.C.) • Dalton developed the first modern atomic theory.

  7. Review • Democritus (400 B.C.) • Dalton developed the first modern atomic theory. • published in 1803

  8. Review • Democritus (400 B.C.) • Dalton developed the first modern atomic theory. • published in 1803 • based on observations of himself and others

  9. Review • Democritus (400 B.C.) • Dalton developed the first modern atomic theory. • published in 1803 • based on observations of himself and others • still descriptive and not functional

  10. Review • Democritus (400 B.C.) • Dalton (1803)

  11. Review • Democritus (400 B.C.) • Dalton (1803) • J. J. Thomson discovered the electron.

  12. Review • Democritus (400 B.C.) • Dalton (1803) • J. J. Thomson discovered the electron. • using the cathode ray tube in 1897

  13. Review • Democritus (400 B.C.) • Dalton (1803) • J. J. Thomson discovered the electron. • using the cathode ray tube in 1897 • developed the plum pudding model

  14. Review • Democritus (400 B.C.) • Dalton (1803) • J. J. Thomson (1897)

  15. Review • Democritus (400 B.C.) • Dalton (1803) • J. J. Thomson (1897) • Nagaoka proposed a model with a central nucleus for an atom.

  16. Review • Democritus (400 B.C.) • Dalton (1803) • J. J. Thomson (1897) • Nagaoka proposed a model with a central nucleus for an atom. • proposed in 1904

  17. Review • Democritus (400 B.C.) • Dalton (1803) • J. J. Thomson (1897) • Nagaoka proposed a model with a central nucleus for an atom. • proposed in 1904 • not well publicized in Europe and America

  18. Review • Democritus (400 B.C.) • Dalton (1803) • J. J. Thomson (1897) • Nagaoka (1904)

  19. Review • Democritus (400 B.C.) • Dalton (1803) • J. J. Thomson (1897) • Nagaoka (1904) • Rutherford discovered the nucleus.

  20. Review • Democritus (400 B.C.) • Dalton (1803) • J. J. Thomson (1897) • Nagaoka (1904) • Rutherford discovered the nucleus. • Developed the solar system model in 1911

  21. Review • Democritus (400 B.C.) • Dalton (1803) • J. J. Thomson (1897) • Nagaoka (1904) • Rutherford (1911)

  22. Review • Democritus (400 B.C.) • Dalton (1803) • J. J. Thomson (1897) • Nagaoka (1904) • Rutherford (1911) • That is where we left off.

  23. Problem • There is a problem with the solar system model.

  24. Problem • There is a problem with the solar system model. • Classical physics says that as a charged particle moves in a circle, it emits energy.

  25. Problem • There is a problem with the solar system model. • Classical physics says that as a charged particle moves in a circle, it emits energy. • As the electron emits energy, its orbital energy should decay.

  26. Problem • There is a problem with the solar system model. • Classical physics says that as a charged particle moves in a circle, it emits energy. • As the electron emits energy, its orbital energy should decay. • The electron should spiral into the nucleus.

  27. Problem • There is a problem with the solar system model. • Classical physics says that as a charged particle moves in a circle, it emits energy. • As the electron emits energy, its orbital energy should decay. • The electron should spiral into the nucleus.

  28. Problem • There is a problem with the solar system model. • Classical physics says that as a charged particle moves in a circle, it emits energy. • As the electron emits energy, its orbital energy should decay. • The electron should spiral into the nucleus. • It should take about 1/1,000,000,000 of a second.

  29. Problem • There is a problem with the solar system model. • Classical physics says that as a charged particle moves in a circle, it emits energy. • As the electron emits energy, its orbital energy should decay. • The electron should spiral into the nucleus. • It should take about 1/1,000,000,000 of a second. • But, electrons don’t spiral into the nucleus!

  30. Problem • There is a problem with the solar system model. • We need a newer, more realistic model of the atom.

  31. Problem • There is a problem with the solar system model. • We need a newer, more realistic model of the atom. • Here comes the quantum model.

  32. Max Planck

  33. Max Planck • Max Planck said that energy is in packets he called “quanta.”

  34. Max Planck • Max Planck said that energy is in packets he called “quanta.” • That is, the energy in a system increases or decreases in steps.

  35. Max Planck • Max Planck said that energy is in packets he called “quanta.” • That is, the energy in a system increases or decreases in steps. • This is contrary to what is predicted by classical physics.

  36. Max Planck • Max Planck said that energy is in packets he called “quanta.” • That is, the energy in a system increases or decreases in steps. • This is contrary to what is predicted by classical physics. • Today, we call those energy packets photons.

  37. Max Planck • The energy in a photon depends on the frequency of the light.

  38. Max Planck • The energy in a photon depends on the frequency of the light. • Energy, E, is equal to a constant, h, (Planck’s constant), times the frequency of the light, ν (lower case Greek letter nu).

  39. Max Planck • The energy in a photon depends on the frequency of the light. • Energy, E, is equal to a constant, h, (Planck’s constant), times the frequency of the light, ν (lower case Greek letter nu). • E = hν

  40. Max Planck • The energy in a photon depends on the frequency of the light. • Energy, E, is equal to a constant, h, (Planck’s constant), times the frequency of the light, ν (lower case Greek letter nu). • E = hν • Presented in 1900.

  41. Albert Einstein

  42. Albert Einstein • Albert Einstein made use of these quanta to explain the photoelectric effect.

  43. Albert Einstein • The photoelectric effect:

  44. Albert Einstein • The photoelectric effect: • If we shine blue light on the surface of a piece of metal, electrons are ejected from the metal.

  45. Albert Einstein • The photoelectric effect: • If we shine blue light on the surface of a piece of metal, electrons are ejected from the metal.

  46. Albert Einstein • The photoelectric effect: • If we shine red light on the surface of a piece of metal, no electrons are ejected from the metal.

  47. Albert Einstein • The photoelectric effect: • If we shine red light on the surface of a piece of metal, no electrons are ejected from the metal.

  48. Albert Einstein • In 1905, Einstein published four papers that contributed substantially to the foundations of modern physics.

  49. Albert Einstein • In 1905, Einstein published four papers that contributed substantially to the foundations of modern physics. • The first one published focused on the photoelectric effect.

  50. Albert Einstein • Einstein said that we needed to look at light as a particle, not as a wave.

More Related