1 / 6

Vendor Technical Information Facilitator Insights from FENOC Conference 2006

Explore key topics like program ownership, in-house vs. contracted resources, and organizational challenges in utilizing Corrective Action Programs. Gain valuable takeaways on VTI classifications, responsiveness, and evolving industry practices.

inez-harmon
Télécharger la présentation

Vendor Technical Information Facilitator Insights from FENOC Conference 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BREAKOUT 4:Vendor Technical Information Facilitator: Bill Kline FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) June 11-14, 2006Richmond, VA

  2. Topics for Discussion • Organizational “Ownership for Program Requirements • In-house vs. Contracted Resources • Incorporation of OE

  3. Organizational “Ownership” • Organizational “assignment” within Industry • Typical Reporting structure • Half of attendees • CM Group Coordinators • St Lucie • Majority - Procurement Engineering • Some - System Engineering • Some - Record Management • Dominion - Virginia • Two VTM Coordinators, 1 Surry, 1 North Anna • Dominion - Millstone • Design Engineering • Planning • Use of Corrective Action Program for assignments

  4. Organizational “Ownership” (cont.) • “Ownership” challenges encountered • Process related • No common process identified • Implementation related • DTE Energy • Use of Corrective Action Program • issue - lack of timely response • Organizational “Awareness” • VTI importance to CM integrity • Awareness: Keeping VTMs up to date is not just an Engineering responsibility • Other site groups involvement is increasing (using methods “PIs” and ‘”CAS”)

  5. In-House vs. Contracted Resources • In-house vs. Contracted distribution • Headcount • Most all performed in-house • VTI changes processed per year • From a couple of hundred up to about a thousand • Vendor Re-contact • 50/50 split between in-house and outside vendor • Outside source “VIS” subscription • Degree of responsiveness • In-house - Getting worse • Outside source “VIS” subscription - Number of responses consistent

  6. Take Away Points • Areas of “Good Practice” • Levels of VTI classifications • Dominion • Component Specific • Make/Model Specific • Generic - i.e. solenoid, etc • Manufacturer • Areas of Concern • Composites - Skid mounted • One manual for all • Individual manuals for each component • Developing Issues • Access to Vendor proprietary drawings

More Related