1 / 10

Enhancing accountability and procedures through transparency and comparability

Enhancing accountability and procedures through transparency and comparability. Axel Aerden. 19 May 2011. Degree and accreditation mills by region. Source : Cohen, E.B., Winch, R. , Diploma and Accreditation Mills: New Trends in Credential Abuse , March 2011.

ingrid
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing accountability and procedures through transparency and comparability

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Enhancing accountability and procedures through transparency and comparability Axel Aerden 19 May 2011

  2. Degree and accreditation mills by region Source: Cohen, E.B., Winch, R. , Diploma and Accreditation Mills: New Trends in Credential Abuse, March 2011

  3. The position of QA / accreditation agency ‘Higher education’ Recognition Funding Support • Appreciation Value for €Proof of use Quality Access Enhancement QA/A Agency Information Accountability ‘Government’ ‘Society’ (Consumer) protection Support

  4. Transparency at national level • General clarity in NVAO’s system • Providers need to be recognised as HE institutions • HE provision needs to be accredited • (Initial) accreditation decision • Identifies level, discipline and orientation “The programme is in line with what is (inter)nationally accepted for a programme of this level and in this subject/discipline” • “They practice what they preach” • National register of recognised higher education

  5. European HE Quality Assurance Landscape European Credit Transfer System Level descriptors AD, Ba., Ma. & Dr. Qualifications Framework for EHEA “Ph.D.” 3rd cycle European University Association (EUA) European Standards & Guidelines for QA European Student Union (ESU) “Master” 2nd cycle90-120 ECTS Peer review of QA Agency Bachelor 1st cycle 180-240 ECTS European Association of HEIs (EURASHE) AssociateDegree+/- 120 ECTS European QA Register European Association for QA in HE (ENQA)

  6. International level Qualification Master of Science in Engineering UNI. XYZ Diploma Supplement External QA QA/A Agency • Learning outcomes • … • … • … ENQA EQAR ECA

  7. Aims: • Mutual recognition of accreditation & quality assurance decisions • Dissemination of experiences with accreditation(-like) practices • Provision of transparent information on quality • Facilitation of internationalisation of institutions and students Mutual recognition accreditation decisions Signed agreementsLetters of Intent Joint declaration regarding the automatic recognition of qualifications Aim: if preconditions are met, degrees awarded by accredited institutions and/or accredited programmes should be automatically accepted in the countries concerned Results: • Code of good practice (2004) • Principles for the selection of experts (2005) • Principles for accreditation procedures regarding joint programmes (2007) • Mutual recognition agreements (2007) • Qrossroads.eu (2008) • Principles regarding learning outcomes in accreditation procedures (2009) • Multilateral agreement regarding joint programmes (2010) Participants: • Partners • Observers

  8. The Qrossroads Network OAQdb HRK/ARdb 1 Public website Internet PKAdb ANECAdb QROSSROADSdatabase NOKUTdb 3 ACEdb FHRdb HSVdb 2 CTIdb SLACdb AACdb EVAdb AZVOdb NVAOdb HACdb Securesync XML XMLparser

  9. www.qrossroads.eu

  10. Thank you for your attention a.aerden@nvao.netwww.nvao.net | www.qrossroads.eu

More Related