Download
acute effects of alcohol on executive cognitive functioning domain specificity n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Acute effects of alcohol on Executive Cognitive Functioning: Domain specificity PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Acute effects of alcohol on Executive Cognitive Functioning: Domain specificity

Acute effects of alcohol on Executive Cognitive Functioning: Domain specificity

176 Vues Download Presentation
Télécharger la présentation

Acute effects of alcohol on Executive Cognitive Functioning: Domain specificity

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Acute effects of alcohol on Executive Cognitive Functioning: Domain specificity Brandon A. Durant PI: Bruce D. Bartholow MU Social Cognitive Neuroscience

  2. Background • Alcohol effects on social behavior linked to impaired cognition • Aggression, sexual risk-taking, etc. • Executive Cognitive Functioning (ECF) • “a higher order cognitive construct involved in the planning, initiation, and regulation of goal-directed behavior” • Impairment of ECF directly mediates alcohol-related changes in social behaviors (Giancola, 2000)

  3. Inconsistency • Some studies suggest that alcohol impairs some aspects of ECF; others say ECF impaired while leaving other cognitive abilities intact (Hoaken et al., 1998) • Could be a function of specific tasks/abilities being tested • Most consistent impairment observed with inhibition (e.g., Fillmore & Vogel-Sprott, 1999, 2000) • Some tasks arguably tap multiple ECF components; some might be more sensitive to alcohol than others

  4. Hypotheses • Alcohol will impair performance on tasks designed to measure inhibition • Stroop, Antisaccade • Performance on a “complex” ECF task, thought to involve multiple aspects of ECF, will be less affected by alcohol • Trails-making test, version B

  5. Trail Making Test (Version B)

  6. Antisaccade 7

  7. Stroop Incongruent Congruent Green Blue

  8. Method • 171 participants • Age range: 21-34 (mean= 23.5) • 53% male; 93% Caucasian • Initial baseline session including: • 9 “specific” EF tasks (3 tasks measuring each of 3 abilities); 2 “complex” EF tasks; brief psychiatric history; various questionnaire measures • Second session (7-21 days later), randomly assigned to beverage and BAC limb conditions • Alcohol (target BAC = .09%), Placebo, or Control • BAC limb = A/D or D only • Ps complete 3 inhibition tasks and 2 complex tasks again

  9. Alcohol impairs Stroop accuracy (descending limb) F(2, 74) = 4.60, p = .01

  10. Alcohol impairs antisaccade performance F(4, 140) = 3.92, p < .01

  11. Alcohol did not (significantly) impair Trails-B • Sober: F(5, 166) = 0.79, p > .05, ns • Ascending: F(2, 86) = 0.57, p > .05, ns • Descending: F(5, 166) = 1.99, p = .10

  12. Conclusion • Alcohol impaired inhibition task performance • At least for Stroop and Antisaccade • Alcohol did not significantly affect Trails B completion time • May be impaired on one cognitive ability, but other cognitive abilities make up for that impairment (Tracy & Bates, 1994) • A task designed to assess frontal brain damage may not be highly sensitive to impairing effects of alcohol

  13. Future directions • Examine other ECF task results • Experiments 2 and 3 will focus on Shifting and Updating, respectively • Examine potential moderation as a function of baseline ECF abilities, previous drinking experience • People with good sober (baseline) performance could be protected from the effects of alcohol (i.e., “more to lose;” Sher et al., 2007) • Heavy drinkers could show differential impairment compared with lighter drinkers

  14. References • Giancola, P. R. (2000). Executive functioning: A conceptual framework for alcohol-related aggression. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 8, 576-597. • Giancola, P. R., Zeichner, A., Yarnell, J., & Dickson, K. (1996). Relation between executive cognitive functioning and the adverse consequences of alcohol use in social drinkers. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 20, 1094-1098. • Hoaken, P., Giancola, P., & Pihl, R. O. (1998). Executive cognitive functions as mediators of alcohol-related aggression. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 33, 47-54. • National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2001). Traffic Safety Facts 2001. U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT HS 809 476). Washington, DC: Author. • Pihl, R. O., Assad, J. M., & Hoaken, P. N. S. (2003). The alcohol-aggression relationship and differential sensitivity to alcohol. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 302-315. • Sher, K. J., Bartholow, B. D., Peuser, K., Erickson, D., & Wood, M. D. (2007). Stress-response dampening effects of alcohol: Attention as a mediator and moderator. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 362-377. • Tracy, J.I., & Bates, M.E. (1994). Models of functional organization as a method for detecting cognitive deficits: Data from a sample of social drinkers. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 55, 726-738.