1 / 19

Reconstructing shredded documents through feature matching

Date: 2012.12.19 Speaker : Meng -Jing Tsai. Reconstructing shredded documents through feature matching. Authors: Edson Justino, Luiz S. Oliveira, Cinthia Freitas Source: Forensic Science International 160 (2006), pp. 140–147. Different Kinds of Shredding. Outline. Introductions

iokina
Télécharger la présentation

Reconstructing shredded documents through feature matching

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Date: 2012.12.19 Speaker: Meng-Jing Tsai Reconstructing shredded documentsthrough feature matching Authors: Edson Justino, Luiz S. Oliveira, Cinthia Freitas Source: Forensic Science International 160 (2006), pp. 140–147

  2. Different Kinds of Shredding

  3. Outline • Introductions • Proposed Method • Experimental Result • Conclusions

  4. Introductions • The amount of time necessary to reconstruct a document depends on the size and the number of fragments, and it can be measured in days or even weeks. • Traditional puzzle solving algorithms usually take into account smooth edges and well defined corners. • The act of shredding a piece of paper by hand often produces some irregularities in the boundaries.

  5. Proposed Method • The block diagram of the proposed methodology 1. 2. 3.

  6. Proposed Method • Pre-processing • In order to overcome this kind of problem, we have tested different algorithms, and the one that brought the best results was the well-known Douglas–Peucker (DP) algorithm.

  7. Proposed Method • Douglas-Peucker Algorithm

  8. Proposed Method • Pre-processing

  9. Proposed Method • Feature extraction (10,110) (180,110) 45 (55,67) (10,70) 120° 43.6 (67,25) (180,0) Fig. 1 Angle features extracted from the polygon

  10. Proposed Method • Matching • Computing the similarity between polygons • Global search

  11. Proposed Method • Computing the similarity between polygons • If the complementarity is verified like in Fig. 2, then Wangles=1. Fig. 2 Similarity between angles

  12. Proposed Method • Computing the similarity between polygons Fig. 3 Distance features extracted from the polygon

  13. Proposed Method • We consider the relevance of the matching regarding the perimeter of the fragment using the following rules: • If the contour matched represents more than 1/5 of the perimeter of the fragment, then Wmatching= Wmatching+2. • If the contour matched represents more than 1/10 of the perimeter of the fragment, then Wmatching = Wmatching+1. • Otherwise, Wmatching is not increased.

  14. Proposed Method • Global search • Let us consider a shredded document D ={F1, F2,..., Fn} composed of n fragments. • The algorithm compares the fragment F1 with all the other fragments searching for the best matching. • Fig. 4 Best matching (a) fragments iand j and (b) new • fragment Fijwhere three vertices were removed

  15. Proposed Method • Steps of the document reconstruction

  16. ExperimentalResult • Examples of a document totally reconstructed: (a) fragments and (b) document reconstructed.

  17. Experimental Result • Performance of the proposed methodology in reconstructing documents shredded by hand. The fragments size range from 1cm × 1cm to 5cm × 5cm.

  18. Conclusions • This paper proposed a method for document reconstruction based on feature matching. • It can be addressed by choosing the most important aspects for the application.

  19. Thank youfor your listening.

More Related