1 / 16

CIRIACO GODDI European Southern Observatory

Disk-mediated accretion in a high-mass YSO and dynamical history in Orion BN/KL. CIRIACO GODDI European Southern Observatory. Main collaborators Lincoln Greenhill Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Lynn Matthews MIT Haystack Observatory Liz Humphreys

iolana
Télécharger la présentation

CIRIACO GODDI European Southern Observatory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Disk-mediated accretion in a high-mass YSO and dynamical history in Orion BN/KL CIRIACO GODDI European Southern Observatory Main collaborators Lincoln Greenhill Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Lynn Matthews MIT Haystack Observatory Liz Humphreys European Southern Observatory Claire Chandler National Radio Astronomy Observatory

  2. Focus on two questions to address in HMSF • Which are the physical properties of Disk/Outflow interfaces? • Sizes/Structures of Disks • Acceleration and Collimation of Outflows • Balance of forces vs radius (gravity/radiation/magnetic field) • Do dynamical interactions among high-mass YSOs play an important role within dense protoclusters? • What might help? • Direct imaging at R < 102 AU • - Gas structure & dynamics, magnetic fields, etc. • - Radio/mm interferometers generally unable to probe inside 10-1000 AU • Multi-epoch observations of radio continuum sources • - 3-D velocities of high-mass YSOs: hints on cluster dynamical evolution • - Long temporal baselines required for measurable position displacements

  3. The closest massive SFR: Orion BN/KL D = 4186 pc (Kim et al. 2008) L ~ 105 L O(200) km s-1 outflow (H2) (Kaifu et al. 2000) BN/KL Trapezium What is powering Orion BN/KL?

  4. A High Density Protocluster in BN/KL HST/Nic H2 P[FeII] BN/KL BN and IRc sources • 20 IR peaks distributed over 20” • BN and IRc2 brightest IR sources, but not enough to power the nebula! Schultz et al. 1999 Source I BN 1” IRc2 Greenhill et al. 2004 7mm - VLA Source I • Obscured up to 22 μm (AV ≥300) • Ionized disk with R~40 AU (λ7mm) 12.5um, Keck (θ≈0.5”) Reid et al. 2007; Goddi et al. submitted Source I is a luminous, massive, embedded YSO

  5. The case of the high-mass YSO “Source I” in Orion BN/KL Collection of λ7mm observations of Source I at R<1000 AU SiOv=0 J=1-0 (VLA) T~1000 K, n< 107 cm-3 λ7mm cont (VLA) T=104 K SiOv=1,2 J=1-0 (VLBA) T~2000 K, n=1010±1 cm-3 Goddi et al. Greenhill et al. Matthews et al. 150 AU Dataset Transition Instrument Observations Resolution 28SiO (v=1,2 J=1-0) VLBA 35 epochs over 2001-03 0.1 AU 28SiO (v=0 J=1-0) VLA 5 epochs in 10 yrs 25-100 AU 7 mm continuum VLA 3 epochs in 8 yrs 25 AU

  6. Radio Source I drives a “Low-Velocity” NE-SW outflow 7mm SiOv=0+H2O 1.3cm (VLA ) 18 km/s Dec (arcsec) 500 AU Proper motions ofSiO maser spots over 4 epochs RA (arcsec) 100 AU<R<1000 AU Greenhill, Goddi, et al., in prep.

  7. Long-term VLBA imaging study of Source I Integrated Intensity over time SiOv=1,2 1010±1 cm-3 1000-3000 K O(1000) Jy km s-1 peak T=21 months, ΔT~1 month R<100 AU Isolated Features North Arm West Arm Eastern Bridge Dark Band East Arm Western Bridge Streamers South Arm Matthews, Greenhill, Goddi, et al. 2010 ApJ,708, 80

  8. Time-series of VLBA moment 0 images of SiOv=1,2 masers over 2 years IntegratedIntensityepoch-by-epoch T=21 months, ΔT~1 month R<100 AU Physical flow of O(1000) independent clumps • Radial flow (four arms) • Transverse flow(bridge) • Interpretation: • bipolar outflow (limbs) • disk rotation Matthews, Greenhill, Goddi, et al. 2010 ApJ,708, 80 R<100 AU Matthews, Greenhill, Goddi, et al. submitted

  9. 3-D velocity field of SiO (v=1,2) maser emission • O(1000) Proper Motions • 3-11 mo. lifetimes • 3 & 4 month tracks • 43395 spots (0.22 km s-1) • Vpmo=0.8–24 km s-1 • V3D=5.3–25.3 km s-1 • <V3D>=14 km s-1 3-D Velocities: v = 5-25 km/s Vave = 14 km/s • VLOS rotation • NE / SW axis • red/blue arms • declining rotation curve • ∇VLOS in bridge Role of magnetic fields from curvature of p.mo trajectories Matthews, Greenhill, Goddi, et al. submitted

  10. Model of Source I R =10-100 AU R=100-1000 AU Toy-model • Collimated outflow at v~20 km s-1 • => v=0 SiO maser proper motions • Rotating disk with R~50 AU • => v=1,2 SiO masers in bridge + 7mm cont • Wide-angle, rotating wind from the disk • => v=1,2 SiO masers in four arms • Resolved the launch/collimation region of outflow • Identified a good example of disk-mediated accretion

  11. Dynamical Interaction in BN/KL Close Passage between Source I and BN 7mm, VLA (θ≈0.05”),3 epochs in 7 years 12.5um, Keck (θ≈0.5”) ONC-absolute p.mo. P.mo of BN relative to I BN VBN≈26 km/s Greenhill et al. 2004 I VI≈15 km/s 2” Smin(BN-I)=0.11”±0.18”, Tmin(BN-I)=550±10 yr 500 years ago BN and I were as close as 50-100 AU! Goddi et al.submitted See also Gomez et al. 2008

  12. Triple-system decay in BN/KL • Formation of a binary among the most massive bodies • Binary and third object both are ejected with high speed • - VBN~2VI➟ Source I is the binary and BN the escaper Which are mass and orbit of the binary? • Linear momentum conservation • MIVI=MBNVBN=> VBN=2VI => MI=2MBN and MBN=10M • Mass of Source I MI=20M • Mechanical energy conservation • ½(MIVI2+MBNVBN2) = GM1IM2I/2a • Binary orbital separation a<10 AU Source I is a massive (20M) and tight (<10 AU) binary Adapted from Reipurth 2000 Goddi et al. submitted; see also Gomez et al. 2008

  13. Can the original disk(s) survive the collision? The encounter between a pre-existing binary (Source I) and a single (BN) enhances chances to retain the circumbinary disk After 50yrs from the encounter BN N-body simulation Initial systems (binary+single): 1) Mbin=10+10M, Abin=10 AU 2) Msing=10M, S(bin-sing)=500AU Results from 1000 cases: Ejections in 16% of cases Impact Periastron ~tens of AU Vbin=15 km/s, Vsing=30 km/s Abin=4 AU, Egrav~5 1047 erg I Egrav bin=5x1047erg Ekin BN+I=2x1047erg EH2-flow=4x1047erg After 500yrs from the encounter • Work in progress • Ongoing N-body simulations to assess effects of stellar encounters on disks • Mdyn cluster ~20M>Mdynsio ~8M • -dynamical effect of non-gravitational forces? BN I The “hardening” of the binary would provide enough energy to account for the kinetic energy of both runaway stars and the fast H2 outflow! Goddi et al. submitted ; see also Zapata et al. 2009

  14. CONCLUSIONS • Source I is the best example of “resolved” accretion/outflow structure in HMSF • Laboratory to test processes (e.g., balanceofB, L, G) at high-massesand constraintheories (e.g., disk-windmodels) • Evidence of a complex dynamical history in Orion BN/KL • Is BN/KL “non-standard” or is this common in young clusters ? Studies with new EVLA and ALMA needed in other HMSFRs!

  15. Candidate physical mechanisms driving the disk-wind • Disk Photoionization(Hollenbachet al.1994) • For M*~8 M, an ionized wind is set beyond the radius of the masers: • cs < vesc . Unlikely. • Dust-mediatedradiationpressure(Elitzur 1982): • Dust and gas are mixed at R<100 AU: Lmod=105 L, Ṁmod=10-3 M yr-1 • Gas-φSiO. Too little dust.Unlikely. • Line-Drivenwinds(Drew et al. 1998): • vw≥400 km/s, ρw<<10-14g cm-3 inconsistentwithvmas<30 km/s, ρmas>10-14g cm-3 • MHD disk-winds(Konigl & Pudritz 2000): • Maser features are detectedalongcurved and helicalfilaments, indicatingthat • magneticfieldsmay play a role in launching and shaping the wind • Most likely.

  16. Do SiO masers trace physical gas motion? • Supportive evidence: • Two independent kinematic components • Slow evolution of clump morphology • Inconsistent with shock propagation in inhomogeneous medium • Small scatter of centroids about linear proper motions • Consistency of Vlos • Similar appearance over a range of physical conditions Morphologicalevolutionofindividual maser featuresover2yrs

More Related