1 / 19

Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

T. Yamamoto, Yu. A. Pashkin, O. Astafiev, Y. Nakamura & J. S. Tsai. Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits. Presented by Martin Stattin and Vincent Peikert. Index. 1 Introduction: The one qubit system 1.1 Josephson Junction 1.2 Hamiltonian

iris-campos
Télécharger la présentation

Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. T. Yamamoto, Yu. A. Pashkin, O. Astafiev, Y. Nakamura & J. S. Tsai Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits Presented by Martin Stattin and Vincent Peikert

  2. Index • 1 Introduction: The one qubit system • 1.1 Josephson Junction • 1.2 Hamiltonian • 1.3 Energy bands with EJ = 0 • 1.4 Energy bands with EJ <> 0 • 2 Experiment • 2.1 Experiment setup • 2.2 Experiment • 2.3 Results • 3 Data analysis • 3.1 Truth table • 3.2 Data disscussion • 3.3 Improvements

  3. 1: Introduction The one qubit system

  4. 1.1 Josephson Junction • Behaves like a circuit with • capacitance and • inhomogenous inductor • Josephson energy • responsible for coherent • tunneling • Superconducting elements • Gate electrode in our case • also superconducting • => very precise charge tuning

  5. 1.2 Hamiltonian • Parabolar shape of the • electric energy • Josephson energy as a • coupling between charge • states • => Charge is no • good quantum number • anymore !

  6. 1.3 Energy band with EJ = 0 • Charge as a good quantum number • Degeneracy points • => no energy needed to tunnel to the box

  7. 1.3 Energy bands with EJ = 0 Change the quantum number from charge to energy !

  8. 1.4 Energy band with EJ <> 0 • Charge is no good quantum number • degeneracy points splitted up • Possible to reach the degeneracy point by applying a special pulse ! => rabi oscillation (~ to E)

  9. 1.5 Magnetic flux => The Josephson energy is a function of the magnetic flux !

  10. 2: Experiment

  11. 2.1 Experiment setup [1] [2]

  12. 2.2 Experiment [1]

  13. 2.3 Results [1] [1]

  14. 3: Data analysis

  15. 3.1 Truth table • Implementation of CNOT operation succeeded ! => compare data with simulation data

  16. 3.2 Data discussion Numerical calculation of the density matrix's time evolution • Target qubit: • good agreement with the • experiment (but a little offset) • Control qubit: • Discrepency due to the unknown • currend channel in the readout • scheme • Pulse induced currend should not • exceed 2.4 pA but it does • => currend has an extra component • maybe from higher order • Cooper-pair tunnerling

  17. 3.3 Possible improvements • Increasing Em • Decrease the • raise/fall time of • the pulse by 25 % • => red lines

  18. Source list • T. Yamamoto, Yu. A. Pashkin, O. Astafiev, Y. Nakamura & J. S. Tsai, ”Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits”, Nature, Vol 425, pp 941-944, oct 2003 • Yu. A. Pashkin, T. Yamamoto, O. Astafiev, Y. Nakamura, D. Averin & J. S. Tsai, ”Coupling two charge qubits”, NEC Res. and Develop., Vol 44, no 3, pp 273-277, jul 2003 • Lectures on quantum information systems WS 2006/2007, Wallraff, ETHZ

  19. [2]

More Related