1 / 2

Addressing Existing Force Majeure Capacity Shortfalls in Corsican Gas Planning

The Corsican natural gas situation faces a significant capacity shortfall of up to 200 GWh/d due to the rejection of a planning application for a Priority Infrastructure project in the Tirley area. Following a second public inquiry in July 2010, a decision is awaited from the Secretary of State. The proposed modification aims to create a Force Majeure Option contract to manage capacity impacts, with National Grid bearing 50% of the costs and shippers the other half. This urgency emphasizes the need for discussions and a generic solution for NTS entry capacity affected by these challenges.

irisa
Télécharger la présentation

Addressing Existing Force Majeure Capacity Shortfalls in Corsican Gas Planning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Force Majeure • Existing FM situation:Up to 200GWh/d capacity shortfall due to the rejection of NG’s planning application for a PRI in Corse / Tirley area. Second Public Enquiry held July 2010 and awaiting Sec of State decision (DECC / C&LG joint decision). • Mod 262 - rejected in Dec 2009 • Lack of risk to NG revenue seems inappropriate • Transfers risk to consumers • Incentive on shippers to challenge FM • Whether FM terms in UNC are comparable with other normal commercial terms? • Way forward – Mod to November 2010 Mod Panel • Goes some way to addressing the first three points above • FM terms addressed under RIIO-T1

  2. Proposed Modification • Generic solution for treatment of NTS Entry Capacity affected by FM, not geared to specific situation • Urgent – how to solve this? • Urgency due to materiality BUT benefit from discussion? • Key elements of Mod: • Creation of an “FM” Option contract to manage the capacity impact of FM • NG bear 50% of the cost via the Buyback incentive • Shippers bear 50% of the cost via Capacity Neutrality and Commodity • Option is daily exercisable with zero exercise price • Option premium paid to Registered User = rebate affected capacity based on WAP of each Registered User @ ASEP * Constrained capacity of User (pro-rated) • Applies to QSEC / AMSEC capacity at the time the FM was declared (prevents “gaming”)

More Related