1 / 20

Spring 2016 MCAS Data Overview

Spring 2016 MCAS Data Overview. How is accountability determined ?. Narrowing Proficiency Gaps (English, Math, & Science) Growth (English & Math) Extra Credit (English, Math, & Science) + Graduation Rates - Drop-Out Rates + Re-engaging Dropouts Assessment Participation. Accountability.

irishr
Télécharger la présentation

Spring 2016 MCAS Data Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Spring 2016MCAS Data Overview

  2. How is accountability determined? • Narrowing Proficiency Gaps (English, Math, & Science) • Growth (English & Math) • Extra Credit (English, Math, & Science) • + Graduation Rates • - Drop-Out Rates • + Re-engaging Dropouts • Assessment Participation

  3. Accountability 5 level scale of accountability – those meeting the gap narrowing goals in Level 1 and the lowest performing in Level 5 • About 80% of schools are level 1 and 2 (based on cumulative PPI of “all students” and “high needs” groups. • To reach Level 1, a school’s cumulative PPI for both “all students” and “high needs” groups must be “on target” or higher. If not, the school is a Level 2.

  4. Accountability A school is classified Level 3 if: • The school is among the lowest 20% relative to other schools in the same school-type category • If 1 or more of the subgroups in the school are among the lowest performing 20% subgroups (relative to statewide) • If the school has persistently low graduation rates • OR if the school has very low assessment participation rates for any group (less than 90%)

  5. Data protocol – one approach • What does the data tell us and what does the data NOT tell us? • What data can we celebrate? • What are the problems of practice suggested by the data? • What are your key conclusions? What recommendations do you (and your team) have for addressing the problems of practice?

  6. Spring 2016 Participation – We reached our goal!!!

  7. Steady progress toward narrowing the gap…

  8. LHS Spring 2016 – Grade 10 ELA

  9. Proficiency Gap Narrowing ELA (On Target for all students): • 86% of students scored proficient or advanced (2% increase in advanced) – on target! • Only 4% warning/failing (around 30 students) • ELL/Former ELL, Asian, Hispanic/Latino, White subgroups – all on or above target! • Student w/ Disabilities subgroup showed improvement • Decline in Afr. American/Black subgroup

  10. LHS Spring 2016 – Grade 10 Math

  11. Proficiency Gap Narrowing Math (IMPROVED, Below Target for all students) • 71% of students scored proficient or advanced (2% increase in advanced) – improvement! • 11% Failing (down 1%) • Students with Disabilities, Asian, and White subgroups all showed improvement

  12. LHS Spring 2016 – Grade 10 Science

  13. Proficiency Gap Narrowing Science (IMPROVED, Below Target for all students) • First year of testing all 10th graders in Biology. • 50% of students scored proficient or advanced • High needs, Economically Disadvantaged, Students with Disabilities, African American/Black Subgroups have improved (below target) • Asian and White Subgroups are on Target 2011 Baseline CPI = 75.7 2016 CPI = 82.7 2017 Goal = 87.9

  14. ELA Growth – All students

  15. ELA Growth – Hispanic/Latino

  16. ELA Growth – High Needs

  17. Math Growth – All students

  18. Math Growth – Hispanic/Latino

  19. Math Growth – High Needs

  20. DATA SUMMITS • What does the data tell us and what does the data NOT tell us? • What data can we celebrate? • What are the problems of practice suggested by the data? • What are your key conclusions? What recommendations do you (and your team) have for addressing the problems of practice?

More Related