1 / 25

David Brown & Hans Thiel

David Brown & Hans Thiel. VERIFOR – UPDATE Chatham House, 21 July 2006. Today’s Presentation:. Review of outputs: negotiating the website, www.verifor.org VERIFOR in Latin America Broader Latin America FLEG Update. Four International partners. RECAP OF THE VERIFOR PROJECT. We focus on:.

isabella-adrian
Télécharger la présentation

David Brown & Hans Thiel

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DavidBrown & Hans Thiel VERIFOR – UPDATE Chatham House, 21 July 2006

  2. Today’s Presentation: • Review of outputs: negotiating the website, www.verifor.org • VERIFOR in Latin America • Broader Latin America FLEG Update

  3. Four International partners RECAP OF THE VERIFOR PROJECT

  4. We focus on: • Institutional dimensions of verification • Policies • Institutions ~ rules & principles • Social Issues • Mechanisms of inclusion and participation • Phase One: • Learning fromexisting systems & practices: • forest sector case studies • extra-sectoral case studies • Sharing of experience & developing principles for future implementation • Meetings/conferences/consultations/other support activities 2. Phase Two: • Policy process development • Advice to requesting parties to help build VS • Networking & sharing of knowledge

  5. Phase One Outputs • Publications: • VERIFOR Briefing Papers • Country case studies – forest sector • Extrasectoral case studies • Thematic studies • Options Papers • Invited ‘Controversies’ papers: • E.g. Marcus Colchester: ‘Social Dimensions of Verification in FLEGT • Newsletters • Meetings: • Mallorca Experts Consultation (April, 2006) • Contributions to national and international meetings

  6. Main studies [10]: Brazil Costa Rica Ecuador Cambodia Indonesia Malaysia Philippines Cameroon Ghana Canada (BC) Scoping/thematic [prospective]: Bolivia Honduras Nicaragua Trans-border (C.America) China CFs Nepal PNG The Solomon Islands Congo-Brazzaville DRC Tasmania? Phase One Case Studies- Forest Sector

  7. Main studies [5] Kimberley Process Nuclear safeguards CITES UNFCCC/Kyoto Food Standards (meat hygiene standards ~ UK/Netherlands) Additional [prospective] Ombudsmen/ médiateurs Labour standards International election monitoring Fisheries management Extra-sectoral

  8. THE MALLORCA MEETING • 34 international participants, forest sector & extra-sectoral specialists • Focused discussion around 4 key institutional themes: • Ownership • Independence • Legality Standards • Impacts

  9. PLANS FOR THE YEAR AHEAD

  10. Main Research Areas • Work on terminology and definitions • Typologies of and decision-trees for verification system design • Demand-driven research: • Support to interested producer countries/partners • Thematic research on issues such as: • Multi-stakeholder negotiations • How to make FLEG initiatives ‘pro-poor’? • Technological tools • Incentives for industry • Decentralisation • Trans-border trade

  11. Hans Thiel VERIFOR IN LATIN AMERICA

  12. VERIFOR will contribute to: • The generation and management of knowledge about VS • Improve existing verification systems in partner countries • Strengthen processes oriented to establish new VS • The political dialogue / political will to put in place a VS

  13. Dissemination of findings • Workshops / conferences in Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica*, Ecuador*, Colombia • Central American Commission on Environment and Development (CCAD) • FAO Forestry Commission for LAC (COFLAC) • Amazon Treaty Cooperation Organization (OTCA): ALFA Workshop (Brasilia, August 06) • Latin American Workshop on Technologies for Verification in the Forest Sector (Lima, Sept. 2006) • International Union of Forest Research Organization Conference for Latin-American (IUFRO-LAC) (Santiago, September 06)

  14. Contribute to improve existing VS Costa Rica: support to Strategy against illegal logging in cooperation with FAO SINAC TCP • Proposal to give the Forest Regents greater independence from loggers • Proposal for a information system to link administration, control and verification instances • Recommendations to make normative reforms to simplify C+I for SFM (109 criteria <- certification)

  15. The effect of overregulation

  16. Contribute to improve VS Ecuador: support the NWG and the National Multi-stakeholder Dialogue towards the design and discussion of a decentralized Forest Control System • strong effort to include all stakeholders, specially indigenous forest owners • effort to place the process on a high political level and gain ownership of provinces • withdrawal of NGOs: “policy closure” dilema

  17. IN F O R M A T I O N NATIONAL OUTSOURCED FOREST CONTROL SYSTEM G I S STATISTICS FOREST DIRECTORATE CONTRACTED VERIFICATION SERVICES VIGILANCIAVERDECONTROL OF TIMBER TRANSPORTS ON ROADS CONTRACTED FOREST ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES IN LOCAL OFFICES FOREST REGENT DELEGATED CONTROLLING + ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES IN THE FIELD - REVISION OF MANAGEMENT PLANS -GIVING OUT LOGGING LICENCES -GIVING OUT TRANSPORT PERMITS -COLLECTING STUMPAGE TAXES -CONTROL TIMBER HARVESTING OPERATIONS-FILLING OUT TRANSPORT PERMITS AT LANDING -CONTROL TIMBER TRANSPORTS (ROADS)-GRANTING SOCIAL CONTROL AND ACCOUNTABILITY

  18. VIGILANCIAVERDECIVIC WATCHDOG TO OVERSEE THE WHOLE SYSTEM IN F O R M A T I O N NATIONAL DECENTRALIZED FOREST CONTROL SYSTEM G I S STATISTICS NATIONAL FOREST DIRECTORATE CONTRACTED VERIFICATION SERVICES FOREST GUARD (POLICE, ARMED FORCES AND PROVINCE OFFICIALS) DECENTRALIZED FOREST ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES IN PROVINCIAL OFFICES FOREST REGENT DELEGATED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES IN THE FIELD - REVISION OF HARVESTING PLANS -GIVING OUT LOGGING LICENCES -GIVING OUT TRANSPORT PERMITS -COLLECTING STUMPAGE TAXES -RESPONSIBLE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HARVESTING PLAN-FILLING OUT TRANSPORT PERMITS AT LANDING -CONTROL TIMBER TRANSPORTS (ROADS)-GRANTING SOCIAL CONTROL AND ACCOUNTABILITY

  19. New system Ecuador: • Differentiated but complementary roles for the provincial and national forest authority (land use, administration, sanction, accreditation of regents • Agree on a financing strategy and mechanism: forest regents clear role and financial independence from loggers • Role of Vigilancia Verde only watchdog • Only verification services outsourced

  20. Contribute to establish new VS • Honduras: support to legislative reform towards a new VS: forest regents, information system • Nicaragua • Colombia: support to the ruling of the new (April 06) Forest Law to establish a decentralized forest control system: forest “agents”, outsourced verification bodies, national information system

  21. FLEGT issues in LAC Singularities: • LAC timber market • national and regional consumption patterns • % of exports to European market • share of timber exports to total exports • LAC has strong nationally driven processes towards forest law compliance • NFP Brazil • New forest regime Bolivia • Costa Rica, Honduras • Outsourced -> decentralized control scheme Ecuador

  22. Political dialogue • Brazil sovereignty over the Amazon Basin ( <- global public goods ) • FLEGT is seen to be a northern interests driven process to ban “illegal” wood from the market without having an impact on the underlying causes of deforestation and land use change for agriculture: proof of legality for soybean oil?* • FLEGT is becoming a non word in the region and has muted from FLEG in Spanish to ALFA Aplicación de la Legislación Forestal en la Amazonía – Meeting under the umbrella of OTCA to be held in Brasilia late August 2006

  23. ALFA (FLEGT) opportunities: • Some countries with big potential to exemplify verification systems • Potential for a constructive negotiation with less pressures and market driven interests • There is a big need to inform governments and society of the EU-FLEGT Action Plan and its opportunities (win-win)

  24. www.verifor.org

More Related