1 / 22

Future Directions in Research

Future Directions in Research. Linguistic Differences and Learning Disabilities Nonie K. Lesaux . Learners with reading difficulties. Language minority learners. Learners from low-income backgrounds. Themes. Complex, multi-dimensional processes

ismael
Télécharger la présentation

Future Directions in Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Future Directions in Research Linguistic Differences and Learning Disabilities Nonie K. Lesaux

  2. Learners with reading difficulties Language minority learners Learners from low-income backgrounds

  3. Themes • Complex, multi-dimensional processes • Considerable individual variation in literacy and language development in general population • Myriad factors, individual and contextual, influence development of language & literacy skills • Pervasive tensions • Static vs. Dynamic • Asset vs. Liability • One overarching goal

  4. Current State of Affairs • Clear understanding of where things are going wrong • Lack of valid model for identification • Subjectivity and bias in the referral process • Over reliance on self-report, teacher, parent reports of language proficiency • Lack of accountability • Lack of specificity • Assessment • Accommodations • Variability at all levels

  5. The Challenges of Variability • Language and Literacy outcomes of ELLs • Program design and actual implementation • Teaching capacity • District investment in ELL instruction, services • Materials and resources • Most variability in student achievement is associated with classroom-level effects, not school or program-level effects. • Variability as positive or negative

  6. Current Body of Research • Lack of converging lines of evidence of the developmental trajectories of literacy • Implications for expectations, developing instructional methods • No consensus about circumstances under which learning best happens • contextual and demographic information missing • Paradox of research findings and achievement

  7. Where do we go from here? Building consensus • Converging lines of evidence • Cross-sectional, longitudinal, intervention • Multiple methods, flexible methods • Particular methodologies more or less appropriate depending on research questions • Replication & data sharing (e.g., Schneider, 2004) • Contexts • Sample • Measures (create, revise) • New & current theories, hypotheses • Interdisciplinary lenses

  8. Pressing Issues • Moving beyond investigating broad constructs • ELL • Oral language proficiency • Program types • Instructional context • Disaggregating large datasets, district data • Longitudinal research • Variables that have differential effects on outcomes at different times • Effects of interventions, methods • Working with districts

  9. Pressing Issues • Contextual and individual variables • e.g., Studies that include child, home, classroom, system characteristics • Better understand general ELL population • Full spectrum • Complete picture • Normative profiles • Linking assessment, referral process with instructional context • Designs beyond group comparisons • Research-practice iteration

  10. Future Directions: Study Domains • Vocabulary instruction methods • Embedded? Explicit? • Reading comprehension, writing • Strategies • Individual, text, activity (RAND, 2002) • Relationship between L1 and L2 • Motivation, engagement • Assessing language • Learners “stuck” at intermediate • Relationship between word reading and comprehension

  11. Future Directions: Participants • Learners succeeding in the system • Older learners • Middle and high school learners • Overrepresentation, curriculum demands • Subtypes, variability within struggling learners • Within-group variability in literacy skills • Different developmental stages

  12. Future Directions: Instruction • Opportunities to learn • Prereferral strategies • Universal design, multi-tiered approaches • Response to Intervention • Capitalizing on L1 in L2 settings • e.g., cognates • Teacher training, professional development models -viability of peer models

  13. Working with School District Data • ELL classification is temporary • Need for permanent designation in tracking systems • Identifying variables that have an impact on academic success

  14. Research-Practice Iteration • Researchers questions driven by the needs and questions of school district • Cycle of iteration between researchers and practitioners • Practice and subsequent research to be modified and influenced by findings • Unanswered and new questions • Dissemination

  15. The Development of Reading • 5 year longitudinal study • North Vancouver, BC • October, 1997 (Kindergarten) • 30 schools • 197 ESL and 1040 L1 speakers • Varying SES • Firm Foundations Early Literacy Curriculum

  16. Measures of Reading

  17. Reading Comprehension

  18. Socioeconomic Status and Word Reading D’Angiulli, Siegel, & Maggi, 2004

  19. Early Childhood Study (ECS) Sample • 344 young children from Spanish-speaking homes • Boston, Lawrence, and Framingham, MA • Montgomery County, MD • majority born in the US to parents from 22 countries and the US territory of Puerto Rico. • 77% of the families in the sample reported an annual income of less than $30,000 and 21% reported an annual income of less than $10,000 • Language and Literacy measures

  20. Pre-K Fall PictureVocabulary (2) (4) Means: Spanish 65.13 English 68.47 (1) (3) n=46

  21. Research-Practice Iteration • Research questions directly relevant to schools • Two-way communication to inform design • Dissemination of findings • Professional development workshops • Development of subsequent research questions based on current findings, unanswered questions • Similar designs and measures to better understand universal, local issues • Instructional context described or assessed • Promote uniformity in classification and tracking systems of ELLs

  22. Linda Siegel Rose Vukovic Patton Tabors Catherine Snow Tami Katzir Orly Lipka Amy Crosson Jeannette Mancilla-Martinez Natural Sciences & Engineering Research Council of Canada Social Sciences & Humanities Research Council of Canada Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research National Institute for Child Health & Development Acknowledgments

More Related