1 / 20

Enhancements in SPS BPM Impedance Management for Improved Beam Dynamics

This update discusses the recent advancements in the SPS BPM (Beam Position Monitor) impedance, highlighting specific measurements for both BPH (Beam Position Holder) and BPV (Beam Position Vertical) configurations. Key findings include low-frequency imaginary impedance values, detailed modeling of the structures, and their impacts on ultrarelativistic beams. Simulations demonstrate minimal effects on transverse single-bunch dynamics, with emphasis on the importance of impedance matching at electrodes for optimal performance. The work references extensive simulations and provides insights into the role of materials and configurations in managing beam dynamics.

ivi
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancements in SPS BPM Impedance Management for Improved Beam Dynamics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Update on SPS BPM impedance B. Salvant for the 2008 impedance team

  2. Reference: http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1208424/files/CERN-ATS-2009-046.pdf • 106 BPH and 96 BPV in the SPS • Low frequency imaginary impedance for a BPH :Zlong/n ~ 1 mΩ, Zx=- 0.1 kΩ/m and Zy=2 kΩ/m. • Separate simulations for a BPV: Zlong/n~0.5mΩ, Zy= 0.1 kΩ/m and Zx= 0.2 kΩ/m.

  3. Modelled structure for the BPH Ultrarelativistic beams All materials are perfect conductors (except the ceramic spacers) In fact: - Electrodes + pipe should be inStainless Steel - Casing should be in Anticorodal Rs=|V|^2/Plosses

  4. BPH longitudinal (with material losses)

  5. BPH vertical (with material losses)

  6. BPH horizontal (with material losses) Quite insignificant change of transverse displacement on shunt impedance

  7. BPV

  8. From PhD thesis…

  9. BPV (with material losses) Longitudinal vertical horizontal

  10. Effect on the beam Headtail simulations • Simulations done at the time with small longitudinal emittance (0.15 eVs) • All BPMs are lumped in one location accounting for the respective beta functions. • Linear longitudinal restoring force • No direct space charge

  11. BPMs alone (vertical plane)

  12. BPMs alone (horizontal plane)

  13. Summary • Effect of impedance of BPH and BPV is small on transverse single bunch dynamics • Longitudinal modes : • Rs~1 to 10 k Ω • R/Q~ 5 to 20 Ω • Larger for BPHs than BPVs • Frequencies above 1 GHz • Transverse modes: • Modes at 0.5 GHz (vertical for BPH) and 0.7 GHz (horizontal for BPV) • Rs~1 to 20 kΩ/m • R/Q~ 5 to 50 Ω/m

  14. However… ?

  15. Effect of matching the impedance at electrodes coaxial ports in Particle Studio simulations (BPH) Modes are damped by the “perfect matching layer” at the coaxial port Short bunch (1 cm rms) SPS bunch (20 cm rms) Electrodecoaxial port Importance to match the BPM electrodes!

  16. BPH Longitudinal vertical horizontal

  17. Longitudinal Time domain (CST PS) Frequency domain eigenmode solver at the peaks (CST MWS)

  18. Dipolar vertical impedance (PEC)

  19. Longitudinal (with losses) Electrodes + pipe  Stainless Steel Casing  Anticorodal

More Related