1 / 19

FPP Instrument: Review of quasi-optical Polarisation Modulators

FPP Instrument: Review of quasi-optical Polarisation Modulators. The University of Manchester. Giampaolo Pisano Radioastronomy Technology Group Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, University of Manchester, UK FPP Workshop - Henri Poincaré Institute, Paris , 8 th -9 th October 2010.

jacie
Télécharger la présentation

FPP Instrument: Review of quasi-optical Polarisation Modulators

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FPP Instrument: Review of quasi-optical Polarisation Modulators The University of Manchester Giampaolo Pisano Radioastronomy Technology Group Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, University of Manchester, UK FPP Workshop - Henri PoincaréInstitute, Paris, 8th-9th October 2010

  2. Polarisation modulator baseline: Reflecting Half-Wave Plate (RHWP) A bit challenging !

  3. Polarisation modulator: Some of the present requirements Very large dimensions 1.2 m !! 1 Modulation efficiency:  80%? Robust and light device: mechanical rotation needed Broadband performance  Bandwidth ~180% !! 3 4 2 Low absorption losses (also differential losses): thermal emissivity 5 Polarisation systematic effects: deep understanding / control needed 6 ... 7

  4. RHWP: Bands and efficiency see G. Siringoet al., Laboca Experiment D - Phase shift between s & p pol - Modulation efficiency Example d=5.3mm, f=45  nn=20(2n+1)GHz • Bandwidth such that the averaged e~0.8 •  Dn=20GHz (independent on frequency)  Cross-Pol issues to be solved

  5. RHWP: Feasibility D. Chuss (2008) • 500mm diameter wire grids has been built (see VPM - D.Chuss later) •  Is it possible to go up to ~1.2m? 1  It would be very fragile, will the wires bend ?  RHWP bandwidth needs to be improved 3 2 (50 cm diameter wire-grid example)

  6. RHWP: Bandwidth increase • If we could use filters within the 30% bandwidth to select sub-bands • where the average modulation efficiency is >80%: •  Increase in effective bandwidth • Example 540GHz channel:  Increase from 3.7% to 15% in BW

  7. Other known polarisation modulators • Variable Phase Delay modulators (VPM) • Birefringent HWPs • Mesh HWPs (Air-gap or dielectrically embedded) • Note: we are not considering the following devices because they • are relatively ‘narrow’ band (30-40%): • Waveguide polarisation modulators/rotators: • Faraday rotators, rotating waveguides • Microstrip devices: • MEMS switches, SC switches. Etc.

  8. Similar polarisation modulator: Variable Phase Delay Modulator D. Chuss (2008) • This type of modulator does not modulate Q and U at the same time •  Can this apply in our case ?

  9. Birefringent HWPs:Pancharatnam designs - Recipes based on birefringent plates: • Limits on maximum diameters available : •  Quartz Ø ~110mm, Sapphire Ø ~280 mm 1 Bandwidth: 5-plate recipe ~100% 2 (Example of 3-plate sapphire recipe, no ARC) ~10cm

  10. Mesh Half-Wave Plate: Air-gap design G. Pisano et al., Applied Optics v47, n33 (2008) - Recipes based on metal grids geometry/spacing: ~4cm • Dimension in principle achievablebut very thin substrates required  Present limits in diameter ~200mm 1  Too fragile, it can vibrate  Present max bandwidth ~70% 3 2 (Example of inductive stack)

  11. Mesh HWP: Dielectrically embedded design 20cm • Present hot-pressing working up to 300mm (near future 500mm) • Alternative ‘cold bonding’ for bigger diameters under study 1 Bandwidth similar to air-gap 2 Pol 1 • Very robust & light although it might bend with diameters >1m •  Flatness problem (Example of embedded mesh-HWP) 3 Pol 2

  12. Other types and other possible solutions of RHWPs • Dielectrically embedded RHWP • Twist reflectors • - Dielectrically embedded Mesh RHWP • Hard & Soft surfaces • Artificial surfaces

  13. Modified RHWPs: Dielectrically embedded RHWP  Dimensions: should be feasible using photolithography (2 evaporated/etched substrates + cold bonding) * 1  Photolithographic Wire-grid Anti-Reflection Coating  Dielectric substrate   Bandwidth: same as the free-standing one ? 2  Mirror • Very light & robust (held by a mirror) 3 • (*) - 2 m diameter evaporator chambers available • Possible to print masks on 2m width acetate • Printer resolution will allow to build grids with 50um period and 25um strip: •  Wire-grid efficiency still >90% at 1THz frequency

  14. Other RHWPs: Twist reflectors - They are meant to provide 180º phase-shift and work off-axis a) b) c) K.C Hwang El.Lett. (2008) K.C Hwang IEEE MWCL (2010) R.Kastner IEEE TAP (1982) Dimensions:  Ok: depends on CNC machines, photolithography 1 Bandwidth:  a) ~10% , b) 15% , c) 24%  All too narrow 2 Meander-grooved metal surface Corrugated metal surface Meander-strips on dielectric/ metal surfaces

  15. Other RHWPs: Dielectrically embedded Mesh-RHWP - Can we improve the bandwidth using multi-layered embedded grids ? • Present hot-pressing working up to 300mm • Alternative ‘cold bonding’ for bigger diameters not ready yet 1 Anti-Reflection Coating   Bandwidth: same as the free-standing one ? What about the off-axis behaviour ? 2  C/L grids Dielectric substrates   Mirror • Very light & robust (held by a mirror) 3

  16. Other RHWPs: Hard & Soft surfaces - Corrugated surfaces are part of the family of Hard & Soft surfaces P.S. Kildal - Could we design a very broadband RHWPs using this kind of surfaces ?

  17. Other RHWPs: Artificial surfaces (Metasurfaces) - Many more complex surfaces are used to control the propagation of waves at grazing incidence: P.S. Kildal (2009) - The surface impedance can be customised: Q. Wu (2010) Can we tailor the phase characteristics in order to design very broadband RHWPs?

  18. RHWP: Improving efficiency D - Phase shift between s & p pol • - D does not depend only on the path • difference between s & p polarisations • We are implicitly assuming the metallic • reflection to give a phase-shift of p Artificial surface  Could we improve the RHWP performance (bandwidth and cross-pol) using a frequency dependent ‘artificial’ surface’ instead of a flat mirror?

  19. Discussion.. In the view of the imminent proposal writing: - Can we keep the wire-grid RHWP as baseline with the present performance? - Can we improve the RHWP bandwidth ? - Shall we investigate the dielectrically embedded RHWP ? - How can we reduce the cross-pol effects ? Flatter efficiencies across bands. - Other ideas? - ...

More Related