1 / 8

SWAps and Use of Country Systems

SWAps and Use of Country Systems March 24 -28, 2008 Why to update the Guidelines? Current Guidelines issued in 2002 “Interim” reviewed as SWAps evolve to reflect experience Reflect modernization of FM and Disbursement policies.

jacob
Télécharger la présentation

SWAps and Use of Country Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SWAps and Use of Country Systems March 24 -28, 2008

  2. Why to update the Guidelines? • Current Guidelines issued in 2002 • “Interim” reviewed as SWAps evolve to reflect experience • Reflect modernization of FM and Disbursement policies. • There is a current review Bank-wide on the investment lending side on SWAps

  3. Key messages • Nature and scope of the Guidelines • Conceptual issues on SWAps • FM Specifics

  4. Key messages • Nature, scope and approach • No need of separate guidelines, but rather streamlined into the FMPM. • Integrate the SWAps discussion with the work on the Use of Country Systems. • Provide principles (core staff) and good examples – there is no a single model of SWAps.

  5. Interim Guidelines (2002) Country ownership Partnership and consultation Comprehensive sector policy framework Expenditure framework Uniform implementation structures and procedures FMPM (2005) Pooling of: Expenditures to be financed Flow of government and donors funds through jointly agreed channels Use of Country Systems Conceptual issues on SWAps

  6. Key messages • SWAps: mix of IL + DPLs? (Traceability of expenditures) • SWAps: Bridging operations to move to sector budget support. • Presence of defining features vary from one operation to other: • Common element: Sector/Sub-sector strategy • Implementation arrangements: Ring-fenced arrangements to full use of country systems • Is there any need to review the defining features? What about MICs?

  7. FM Specific Issues - Strong co-relation between SWAps and UCS • To what extent, can PFM system issues be addressed through SWAp operations? • Should country level risks be addressed through the same SWAp operation? • Transitional arrangements vs. long-term capacity building efforts • What are the common elements of both initiatives? How should these be reflected in the FMPM and/or Guidelines?

More Related