1 / 12

Tracking of Time-Varying Systems

Tracking of Time-Varying Systems. Adviser: Dr. Yung-An Kao Student: Chin-Chuan Chang. Outline. Introduction Markov Model for System Identification Degree of Nonstationary Criteria for tracking assessment Mean-Square Deviation Misadjustment. Introduction.

jacoba
Télécharger la présentation

Tracking of Time-Varying Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Tracking of Time-Varying Systems Adviser: Dr. Yung-An Kao Student: Chin-Chuan Chang

  2. Outline • Introduction • Markov Model for System Identification • Degree of Nonstationary • Criteria for tracking assessment • Mean-Square Deviation • Misadjustment

  3. Introduction • In previous study, we considered the average behavior of standard LMS and RLS algorithm operating in a stationary environment. • we try to examine the operation of these two filter algorithms in a nonstationary environment, for which the optimum Wiener solution takes on a time varying form. • we will discuss to evaluate the tracking performances of the stand LMS and RLS algorithm operating in a nonstationary environment.

  4. Markov Model for System Identification • An environment may become nonstationary in practice in one of two ways: • The frame of reference provided by the desired response may be time varying. EX: system identification • The stochastic process supplying the tap inputs of the adaptive filter is nonstationary. EX: equalize a time varying channel.

  5. Markov Model for System Identification (cont.) • First-order Markov process. • is noise vector, assumed to be zero mean and correlation matrix • The value of parameter a is very close to unity • Multiple regression • Where ν(n) is white noise, zero mean and variance σ2

  6. Degree of Nonstationary • In order to provide a clear definition of the concept of “slow” and “fast” statistical variations of the model, it define (Macchi, 1995) • It may be rewritten as

  7. Degree of Nonstationary (cont.) • Hence, we may reformulate the degree of nonstationary to • The degree of nonstationary, , bears a useful relation to the misadjustment of adaptive filter.

  8. Criteria for tracking assessment • With the state of unknown dynamical system denoted by , and with the tap-weight vector of the adaptive transversal filter denoted by . • We formally define the tap-error vector as • On the basis of , we may go on to define two figure of merit for assessing the tracking capability of an adaptive filter • Mean-Square Deviation • Misadjustment

  9. Mean-Square Deviation • MSD can defined by • The tap-weight error may be expressed as • Weight vector noise: • Weight vector lag:

  10. Mean-Square Deviation (cont.) • By ,we may express MSD as • Estimation variance defined by • Lag variancedefined by

  11. Misadjustment • Another commonly used figure of merit for assessing the tracking capability of adaptive filter is misadjustment • is called the noise misadjustment • is called the lag misadjustment

More Related