1 / 16

A Finite State Modeling for Adaptive Modulation in Wireless OFDMA Systems

A Finite State Modeling for Adaptive Modulation in Wireless OFDMA Systems. Dania Marabissi, Daniele Tarchi , Federico Genovese, and Romano Fantacci University of Florence, Italy Email: tarchi@lenst.det.unifi.it. Outline. Standard IEEE802.16 S-OFDMA (Scalable-OFDMA)

jadon
Télécharger la présentation

A Finite State Modeling for Adaptive Modulation in Wireless OFDMA Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Finite State Modeling for Adaptive Modulation inWireless OFDMA Systems Dania Marabissi, Daniele Tarchi, Federico Genovese, and Romano Fantacci University of Florence, Italy Email: tarchi@lenst.det.unifi.it COST289 4th Workshop - Gothenburg, Sweden

  2. Outline • Standard IEEE802.16 • S-OFDMA (Scalable-OFDMA) • Adaptive modulation • Proposed adaptation techniques • Numerical results • Conclusions COST289 4th Workshop - Gothenburg, Sweden

  3. Standard IEEE802.16 • WiMAX system, that is based on the IEEE 802.16 specifications, offers broadband wireless accces in a wide are achieving about 50 Km in LoS connections and 10 Km in NLoS connections • The standard aims to have until 70Mbit/s per cell • Almost recently has been finalized the IEEE802.16e version that adds the user mobility functionalities by exploiting the OFDMA technique • This allows to offers mutimedia services in mobility such as Internet, Voice over IP (VoIP) and video streaming COST289 4th Workshop - Gothenburg, Sweden

  4. PHY characteristics • It transmits in the 2 – 11GHz band • Recently has been almost defined four operational bands at 2.3, 2.5, 3.5, 5 GHz • It allows to use QPSK, 16QAM and 64QAM, and variable coding rates • Both TDD and FDD (half and full duplex) are allowed • The channel width can varies from 1.75 MHz to 20 MHz and in TDD the frame time can vary from 2 ms to 20 ms • The IEEE 802.16e has improved the OFDMA support COST289 4th Workshop - Gothenburg, Sweden

  5. S-OFDMA • The IEEE 802.16e standard has introduced a particolar OFDMA called S-OFDMA (Scalable-OFDMA) • It mainly differs from the classical OFDMA because it can support several channel width by varying the FFT size during the subchannel mapping COST289 4th Workshop - Gothenburg, Sweden

  6. Adaptive Modulation • It selects automatically the modulation order for: • minimize the error probability; • maximize the transmitting rate; Channel state adaptativity • The AM (Adaptive Modulation) module manage the adaptivity based one: • channel state information and received power • receiver quality in terms of error rate COST289 4th Workshop - Gothenburg, Sweden

  7. TDD Channel information • The proposed system is to be used in the TDD scheme • It aims to estimate the channel behaviour in the uplink and use the estimation for selecting the best modulation order to be used in the downlink COST289 4th Workshop - Gothenburg, Sweden

  8. Adaptive management Channel state adaptivity Three state Moore machine COST289 4th Workshop - Gothenburg, Sweden

  9. Maximum Throughput Technique • Throughput: Thr(SNR, α, M) = log2(M)[1-SER(SNR, α, M)] • For each fixed SNR we select two thresholds [αA, αB] by solving: Thr(SNR, αA, M=16) = Thr(SNR, αA, M= 4) Thr(SNR, αB, M=64) = Thr(SNR, αB, M=16) 64QAM 16QAM QPSK COST289 4th Workshop - Gothenburg, Sweden

  10. Minimum SER Technique • For each fixed SNR at the BS two thresholds are selected [αA, αB]: SER(SNR, αA, M=16) = SER(SNR, M=4) SER(SNR, αB, M=64) = SER(SNR, M=4) where, supposing, we have: SER(SNR, M=4) COST289 4th Workshop - Gothenburg, Sweden

  11. Target SER Technique • We can define a target SER value (TSER) based on the Quality of Service requested • For each SNR we search two thresholds [αA, αB]: SER(SNR, αA, M=16) = TSER SER(SNR, αB, M=64) = TSER TSER = constant  SNR Example with SNR=15dB COST289 4th Workshop - Gothenburg, Sweden

  12. Decision thresholds COST289 4th Workshop - Gothenburg, Sweden

  13. System Parameters • Channel model ITU-R M.1225 (vehicular A) with 6 Rayleigh distributed main paths and Jake Doppler • Bandwidth equal to 10MHz • NFFT = 1024 carriers • Carrier at 3.5 GHz • Maximum speed equal to 125Km/h • Frame duration TDD: • TF = 8ms; • TDL=TUL=3,995ms; • (TTG=RTG=5μs) • OFDMA symbols in each frame: • 40 in DL + 39 in UL • Distributed subcarriers allocations COST289 4th Workshop - Gothenburg, Sweden

  14. Minimum SER and Maximum Throughput Maximum throughput allows higher rate but higher SER For SNR=8 dB 16QAM is the most used modulation order 2dB For SNR=16 dB 16QAM is the most used modulation order For SNR=16 dB 64QAM is the most used modulation order COST289 4th Workshop - Gothenburg, Sweden

  15. Target SER TSER is imposed based on the requested QoS level COST289 4th Workshop - Gothenburg, Sweden

  16. Conclusions • IEEE 802.16e standard has been designed to perform a broadband wireless access by allowing multimedia services to mobile devices; this can be done thanks to the high flexibility in several parts of the system (like modulation, coding, subcarrier allocation). • We propose a state model for adapt the modulation order to the channel behavior; three different techniques has been presented, that differs from the threshold calculation • The Maximum throughput method is foreseen for real-time applications where the throughput has more importance the error rate. • The Minimum SER aims to achieve the best performance in terms of error probability for a certain SNR • The Target SER aims to respect a target in terms of error probability in order to be considered to be used in specific applications. • What we are working on: • Error rate as a performance indication; • Extension of the model for considering variable coding rate jointly with modulation; • Joint modulation/coding adaptation with subcarrier allocation, also by taking into account the upper layers queue size (opportunistic scheduling techniques). COST289 4th Workshop - Gothenburg, Sweden

More Related