60 likes | 192 Vues
This session aims to clarify WISE SoE TCM processing phases and indicator aggregation steps while addressing specific quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) issues associated with raw and indicator data. The discussion will identify challenges and opportunities for improving QA/QC, data coverage, and usability. Key topics include responsibilities in raw data processing, clarity in data needs during aggregation, and specific QA/QC concerns like primary key values and duplicates. The session also delves into reporting difficulties, feedback mechanisms, and proposing simplified processes for data handling.
E N D
Session 2 – Objective & Guiding Questions • Objective: • To clarify the WISE SoE TCM processing phase & indicator • aggregation steps; to discuss specific QA/QC issues on raw & • indicator data; to identify challenges and opportunities to improve • QA/QC and data coverage/use • Guiding questions: • Processing phase raw data & responsabilities clear? • Opportunities for improvement?Eionet & EEA • Aggregation phase & data needs clear? • Specific QA/QC issues (raw & aggregated): Primary key values; • RSC duplicates; Stations Id´s and mapping WFD; Data • resubmission & recoding; Building trends; Waterbody types
Session 2 - Main topics from questionnaires • Difficulties with reporting process (Data Dictionaries; Validation Rules) and better clarification on changes • “ICES reporting” – avoiding duplications • Other Regional Sea Conventions & Eionet reporting: BSC & UNEP-MAP • Updates on DD (Eionet reporting) vs ICES reporting • Earlier publication of DD changes • Feedback on QA/QC - using email & CDR • Ways to simplify overall process (e.g. Merging DD´s)? • XML (through Access tool) and excel reporting
Session 2 – WISE SoE TCM data processing and quality issues Summary