1 / 43

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. CLASS THIRTEEN. Today’s Topics: Counsel. Conflicts of Interest Gov’t-Induced Ineffectiveness Perjury Selection Limits Self-Representation. Today’s Topics: Sentencing. Basic Concepts Constitutional Limitations Punishment Options to Incarceration

jaegar
Télécharger la présentation

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CLASS THIRTEEN

  2. Today’s Topics: Counsel • Conflicts of Interest • Gov’t-Induced Ineffectiveness • Perjury • Selection Limits • Self-Representation

  3. Today’s Topics: Sentencing • Basic Concepts • Constitutional Limitations • Punishment Options to Incarceration • Federal Sentencing Guidelines

  4. Conflicts of Interest • Three prisms • Per se • Active • Waiver • Recall Strickland • Prejudice can be presumed if conflict

  5. Multiple Representation • Issue: Is allowing or requiring a single lawyer to represent co-defendants a per se violation of right to effective assistance of counsel

  6. Multiple Representation • Query: What evils or dangers flow from joint representation? • Query: What possible benefits can flow from joint representation?

  7. Holloway v. Arkansas Questions • Why was Supreme Court willing to engage in presumption of conflict? • Did Supreme Court did find actual conflict? • How did D show he was prejudiced under specific facts of this case? • What should trial court have done in face of trial counsel’s request?

  8. Other Sources of Conflict: Exercise • Multiple representation of codefendants might provide one source of conflict, as seen in Holloway • Identify at least two other fact patterns in which a potential conflict exists

  9. Active Conflict • Issue: Does trial judge have affirmative duty to inquire into facts surrounding each multiple representation case? • Issue: If D does not object at trial, what is D’s burden on appeal • Cuyler v. Sullivan

  10. Mickens v. Taylor [Supplement]: Questions for Review • How limit Holloway? • What is the role of Strickland? Sullivan? • Following this case, how would you define “conflict” so as to trigger automatic reversal? • Are all conflicts equal? • What is the role of successive representation?

  11. Cooperating Lawyers • Burger v. Kemp • Risk of prejudice increases when 2 lawyers cooperate with one another in planning and conducting trial strategy

  12. Other Induced Ineffectiveness • Impairing Defense Strategy • Brooks v. Tennessee: D either had to testify first or not at all • Herring b. New York: No right to D closing argument in trial to court

  13. Other Induced Ineffectiveness • Inhibiting Consultation • Geders v. United States: D kept from talking with trial counsel during 17-hour overnight recess • Perry v. Leeke: D kept from talking with lawyer during 15 minute recess

  14. Other Induced Ineffectiveness • Interfering with Relationship • Weatherford v. Bursey: Co-D becomes gov’t witness

  15. Perjury • Focus: What obligations does D counsel face when she believes her client is about to commit perjury? • Focus: How does the perjury possibility play out with Ineffective Assistance claims under Strickland?

  16. Nix v. Whiteside • Issue: Under Strickland is there a modified test for presuming prejudice? • Issue: Was lawyer ineffective under these facts?

  17. More Difficult Questions • What if client was not dissuaded and demands to testify • What if client appears dissuaded but once on stand, lies • What if lawyer does not become aware of perjury under after client has testified

  18. Ethical Obligation • Model Rules: Mandatory for lawyer who knows client has committed perjury to disclose knowledge to tribunal if lawyer cannot persuade client to rectify problem

  19. Selection Limitations • No right to particular, specific lawyer • Right to retain counsel of choice is qualified right • Wheat v. United States • Presumption in favor of D’s counsel of choice • Presumption can be overcome if • Demonstration of actual conflict • Showing of serious potential for conflict • Seizing Fees

  20. Self Representation • Faretta v. California • Right not expressly stated in 6th Amendment, but implied by structure • Essence: D has protectable right of autonomy

  21. Self-Representation and Competency • Godinz v. Moran • NOTE: More than “rational understanding” test for pleas or trial

  22. Waiver • Knowing and voluntary • Detailed warnings • Generally must be unequivocable

  23. Remedy • Per se reversal • McKasle v. Wiggins • Not harmless error analysis

  24. Limitations • Timeliness • Order & decorum • Witness Protection • Standby Counsel

  25. SENTENCING Chapter Eleven

  26. Basic Concepts • General absence of constitutional and non-constitutional safeguards • Relaxed evidentiary rules • Identify of sentencer • Texas option

  27. Basic Concepts • Prosecutor’s role • Impact of Administrators • Parole Board • Probation Officers • Systems Design • Guidelines • Ad Hoc • Recidivists

  28. Constitutional Limitations • 8th Amendment: Cruel and Unusual Punishment • 1st Amendment • 5th Amendment: Equal Protection

  29. Cruel and Unusual • 8th Amendment: Excessive bails should not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted • Typical Challenges • Mandatory sentences • Proportionality

  30. Mandatory Punishments • Rummel v. Estelle • Ewing v. California (Supplement)

  31. Proportionality • Solem v. Helm factors • Gravity of offense and harshness of penalty • Other sentences imposed on other criminals in same jurisdiction • Sentences imposed for commission of same crime in other jurisdictions

  32. Proportionality • Harmelin v. Michigan [plurality] • Sentence which is not otherwise cruel and unusual does not become so merely because it is mandatory • Scalia opinion: Proportionality not required • Kennedy Opinion • Fixing prison terms belongs to Legislature • No one penological theory mandated by 8th Amendment • Federal system = divergence • Objective factors should be identified, e.g., type of punishment imposed • White Dissent: would be disproportionate

  33. Other Remedies? • Since Harmelin, proportionality attacks have rarely been successful • Only focus: gravity of offense and harshness of penalty • Alternatives: • Clemency • Media • Legislature

  34. First Amendment • Hate Crimes • Son of Sam Laws

  35. Equal Protection • Claim: • Discriminatory intent • Discriminatory effect

  36. Punishment Other than Incarceration • Fines • Relationship to Indigency • Forfeiture • Restitution • Diversion • Civil Commitment

  37. Fines • Equal Protection Impact • May not imprison beyond maximum because D unable to pay fines and court costs • Cannot imprison for failure to pay fine if fine is only possible punishment • Motion to Revoke Probation: must consider alternative means

  38. Forfeiture • Civil and criminal • Civil does not require conviction • Criminal = in personam • Civil = in rem • Challenges • 1st Amendment • 8th Amendment • 5th Amendment

  39. Forfetiure & 8th Amendment • Alexander v. United States • United States v. Bajakajian

  40. Probation / Diversion • Often area of broad discretion for Judge • “Contract” between Court and Judge • Motion to Revoke • Diversion increasing with drug courts and family violence courts

  41. Restitution • Increased use • Response to crime victim’s movement

  42. Civil Commitment: Insanity • Permissible: • Burden on D by preponderance to show no longer insane • Confinement for more than maximum time of charged criminal offense • Impermissible: • Continued confinement once sanity restored

  43. Federal Sentencing Guidelines • Grid profiles of actual conduct and actual offender • Departures • Judge justification • Appellate review • Impact on parole

More Related