1 / 88

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. CLASS TWELVE. Today’s Topics: Trial by Jury. Fundamental Right What Jury Decides Jury Features Jury Selection & Composition. Today’s Topics: Trial Issues. Right to Participate Presence Competency Stages Trial in Absentia. Today’s Topics: Trial Issues.

jules
Télécharger la présentation

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CLASS TWELVE

  2. Today’s Topics: Trial by Jury • Fundamental Right • What Jury Decides • Jury Features • Jury Selection & Composition

  3. Today’s Topics: Trial Issues • Right to Participate • Presence • Competency • Stages • Trial in Absentia

  4. Today’s Topics: Trial Issues • Effective Assistance of Counsel • Performance • Prejudice

  5. TRIAL BY JURY

  6. Fundamental Right • Right to trial by jury in criminal cases mentioned in two places in Constitution • Sixth Amendment: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district …”

  7. Fundamental Right • Issue: When is D entitled to jury in criminal case? • Duncan v. Louisiana: 14th Amd guarantees right of jury trial in all criminal cases which -- were they to be tried in federal court -- would come within reach of 6th Amd • Query: Why is right to jury trial so significant to sense of justice that Supreme Court willing to override state constitutional provision?

  8. Fundamental Right • Issue: What is a “serious” [non-petty] offense? • Baldwin v. New York: Penalties of more than six months possible imprisonment are not petty • Contrast, Right to counsel jurisprudence where actual confinement triggers

  9. Fundamental Right • Issue: Applicable to Criminal Contempt? • Consider both length of possible punishment and potential severity of monetary fine

  10. Fundamental Right • Issue: What if penalty involves something other than incarceration? [Example: license suspension]

  11. What Jury Decides • Issue: Can trial judge instruct jury to find that prosecution has proved particular element of case?

  12. Jury Features • Issues: Does the constitutional right to trial by jury in criminal cases dictate specific jury size [e.g., 12]? Unanimous verdicts?

  13. Jury Size • Are 12 person juries constitutionally required? • Are 6 person juries constitutional? • Are 5 person juries constitutional?

  14. Juror Agreement on Verdict • Is an 11-1 verdict constitutionally permissible? • 10-2? • 5-1?

  15. Jury Selection and Composition • Two perspectives: • Jury pool • Venire • Group of potential jurors -- “panel” from which jury is ultimately selected • Individual jury • Petit jury

  16. Jury Pool • Key concept: Important that American juries be both impartial and reflect the community character [be representative]

  17. Jury Pool • Historically, cases began as challenges under 14th Amd, focusing primarily on race • Distinguish jury pool/fair cross section requirements from what is necessary on individual jury

  18. Jury Pool Questions • Is it permissible to exclude potential jurors on basis of race?

  19. Jury Pool Questions • Is it permissible to exclude potential jurors for non-race reasons, such as fact that they are daily wage earners?

  20. Jury Pool Questions • Permissible to exclude women?

  21. Jury Pool Questions • Permissible to exclude on ethnic grounds?

  22. Jury Pool Questions • Permissible to require “opt in” system [e.g., person must file declaration of desire in order to be subject to service]?

  23. Jury Pool Questions • Can a man object to exclusion of women under fair cross-section analysis?

  24. Practical Responses • Generally if State able to show a truly random selection process, then most cross-section challenges can be avoided. • Methods?

  25. Voir Dire • Voir: see • Dire: say • Attorneys: “to speak the truth” • Perspective jurors can be eliminated from jury service in either of two ways • Challenge for cause • Peremptory challenges

  26. Challenges for Cause • Unlimited number • Address juror disqualification • All cases • This case

  27. Peremptory Challenges • “Strikes” • Set number, usually defined by offense type and number of defendants • Can be used for any reasons other than those prohibited in Batson and its progeny

  28. Panel Examination Methods • Question entire panel • Address each juror individually • Example: Texas capital when death sought • Judge-only conducted voir dire • Frequent in federal district court • Attorney questioning after introduction by trial court

  29. Judge Discretion • Questionnaires • Length of voir dire: time limits • Scope of questions [some constitutional restrictions]

  30. Exercise: Limits on Questions • Ham v. South Carolina • Judge required to interrogate jurors on racial prejudice. Not required to frame that inquiry in any particular form or with any specified number of questions • Ristaino v. Ross • Constitution does not always entitle D to have questions posed during void dire specifically directed to matters that might prejudice potential jurors against him • Rosales-Lopez v. United States

  31. Exercise: Limits on Questions • Turner v. Murray • Mu-Min v. Virginia • Query: How reconcile Ham, Ristaino, Rosales-Lopes, Turner and Mu-Min? If you were charged with teaching new prosecutors, how would you describe the rule?

  32. Limits on Peremptory Challenges • Generally: With the exception of Batson, strikes are “free” for counsel to extent that • party not forced to explain basis on which they were made • they are beyond control of the court • Equal Protection Clause places some boundaries on almost standardless use of peremptory challenges by party advocates

  33. Batson • Facts: African American defendant challenged composition of jury from which members of his race had been purposefully excluded • What does challenging party need to show about opposing party’s use of peremptory challenges?

  34. Batson • What voir dire circumstances might be relevant? • Once prima facie case shown, what must challenged party do? • What relationship to challenge for cause? • Is peremptory challenge system constitutionally required?

  35. Batson Developments • Issue: Does white D have standing to raise Batson challenge to exclusion of African American venire member?

  36. Batson Developments • Does Batson apply to civil trials?

  37. Batson Developments • Does Batson apply to strikes by defense counsel as well as prosecutor?

  38. Batson Developments • Does Batson apply to gender?

  39. Batson Developments • Does Batson apply to other ethnic groups?

  40. RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE

  41. Concepts • Does D have to present? • What if he is disruptive? • What if he skips bail and never shows up? • What is he flees mid-way through trial?

  42. Concepts • What if D is not mentally “there” even though physically present?

  43. Concepts • To which stages of proceeding does constitutional right apply?

  44. Presence • 6th Amd foundation: confrontation clause • Unruly D [Illinois v. Allen] • Constitutionally permissible responses • bind and gag • cite for contempt • “time out” removal until promise to behave • Query: What post-1970 technologies may offer additional alternatives?

  45. Indicia of Confinement • Uniformed officers • Jail clothes • Query: What constitutional theory implicated?

  46. Competency • Premise: Constitutional right to be present embraces D’s right to participate in her own defense. Many include many facets, such as ensuring that: • witnesses are fully cross-examined • exculpatory facts are presented • potential jurors are challenged

  47. Competency • Test: Whether D has • sufficient present ability to consult with lawyer with reasonable degree of rational understanding • rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against him

  48. Competency • Query: If D is incompetent, is there a permanent bar on trying him?

  49. Forced Medication • Issues: What can the gov’t do to force someone to regain competency? Which party bears what burden? • Riggins v. Nevada • Medina v. California • Cooper v. Oklahoma

  50. Stages • Concept: D has constitutional right to be present at trial • Questions: Does this include: • Note sent to judge during jury deliberations? • In chambers hearings among judge and attorneys?

More Related