1 / 37

Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”

The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Faculty of Education. School Development and Evaluation Team. Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”. Data Report (05-06). (Restricted and for Internal Circulation Only). Wah Yan College, Kowloon. School code﹕64.

jaguar
Télécharger la présentation

Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Chinese University of Hong Kong Faculty of Education School Development and Evaluation Team Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Data Report (05-06) (Restricted and for Internal Circulation Only) Wah Yan College, Kowloon School code﹕64

  2. Areas of School Self-Evaluation I. Students’ Performance Indicators from CUHK: PI 01: Students’ Quality of School Life PI 02: Students’ Perception of School Climate PI 03: Students’ Socio-Economic Status PI 04: Students’ Perception of Parental Styles II. Teachers’ Performance Indicators from CUHK : PI 11: Teachers’ Feelings about School Life PI 13: School Organizational Values PI 14: Organizational Learning III. Parents’ Performance Indicators from CUHK : PI 32: Parents’ Perception of the School

  3. I. Students’ Performance Indicators from CUHK: PI 01: Students’ Quality of School Life PI 02: Students’ Perception of School Climate PI 03: Students’ Socio-Economic Status PI 04: Students’ Perception of Parental Styles

  4. School Mean Fig. 1a: Students’ Quality of School Life (1) Mean for twenty-five secondary schools Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree). Mean (Agree) (Disagree) (Strongly Disagree) General Satisfaction Negative Feeling* Teacher -Pupil Relation Social Integration Personal Achieve-ment Future Oppor-tunities Experience in School Life (*Negative domain) Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  5. Fig. 1b: Students’ Quality of School Life (2) (Strongly Agree) Student Distribution (Agree) (Disagree) (Strongly Disagree) General Satisfaction Negative Feeling* Teacher -Pupil Relation Social Integration Personal Achieve-ment Future Oppor-tunities Experience in School Life (*Negative domain) Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  6. Mean of S1 students Fig. 1c: Students’ Quality of School Life (3) Mean of S2 students Mean of S3 students Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree). Mean of S4 students Mean of S5 students Mean of S6 students Mean (Agree) (Disagree) (Strongly Disagree) General Satisfaction Negative Feeling* Teacher -Pupil Relation Social Integration Personal Achieve-ment Future Oppor-tunities Experience in School Life (*Negative domain) Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  7. Fig. 2a: Students’ Perception of the Staff and Students (1) School Mean Mean for twenty-five secondary schools Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree). Mean (Agree) (Disagree) Principal/ School Head Teachers Classmates Clerical Staff Technicians / Teaching Assistants Janitors Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  8. Fig. 2b: Students’ Perception of Effectiveness of the School (1) School Mean Mean for twenty-five secondary schools Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree). Mean (Agree) (Disagree) Learning per se Physical & Arts Education Teaching Extra-Curricular Activities Moral & Civic Education Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  9. Fig. 2c: Students’ Perception of the Staff and Students (2) (Strongly Agree) Student Distribution (Agree) (Disagree) (Strongly Disagree) Principal/ School Head Teachers Classmates Clerical Staff Technicians / Teaching Assistants Janitors Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  10. Fig. 2d: Students’ Perception of Effectiveness of the School (2) (Strongly Agree) Student Distribution (Agree) (Disagree) (Strongly Disagree) Learning per se Teaching Extra-Curricular Activities Moral & Civic Education Physical & Arts Education Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  11. Mean of S1 students Fig. 2e: Students’ Perception of the Staff and Students (3) Mean of S2 students Mean of S3 students Mean of S4 students Mean of S5 students Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree). Mean of S6 students Mean (Agree) (Disagree) (Strongly Disagree) Principal/ School Head Teachers Classmates Clerical Staff Technicians / Teaching Assistants Janitors Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  12. Mean of S1 students Fig. 2f: Students’ Perception of Effectiveness of the School (3) Mean of S2 students Mean of S3 students Mean of S4 students Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree). Mean of S5 students Mean of S6 students Mean (Agree) (Disagree) (Strongly Disagree) Learning per se Physical & Arts Education Teaching Extra-Curricular Activities Moral & Civic Education Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  13. Fig. 3a: Students’ Socio-Economic Status (1) % for the School % for twenty-five secondary schools Father’s Occupation % Profes-sionals Managers/ Executives Merchants/ Supervisors Clerks/ Sales-persons Skilled workers/ Technicians Public Service Providers Unskilled workers Farmers/ Fishermen/ Domestic Helpers Unemployed/ Non-working Mother’s Occupation % Profes-sionals Managers/ Executives Merchants/ Supervisors Clerks/ Sales-persons Skilled workers/ Technicians Public Service Providers Unskilled workers Farmers/ Fishermen/ Domestic Helpers Unemployed/ Non-working Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  14. Fig. 3b: Students’ Socio-Economic Status (2) % for the School % for twenty-five secondary schools Father’s Education Level % Below Primary Junior Primary Upper Primary Junior Secondary Senior Secondary Matricu-lation Post-Secondary University Level Mother’s Education Level % Below Primary Junior Primary Upper Primary Junior Secondary Senior Secondary Matricu-lation Post-Secondary University Level Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  15. Fig. 3c: Students’ Socio-Economic Status (3) % for the School % for twenty-five secondary schools Family’s Total Monthly Income % $ 5-10K $10-15K $15-20K $20-30K $30-40K $40-50K $50-70K >70K < $ 5K Receiving Government Financial Assistance (CSSA Scheme) Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  16. Fig. 3d: Students’ Socio-Economic Status (4) % for the School % for twenty-five secondary schools Residential Type % Private Housing (owned) Home Ownership Scheme Private Housing(rental) Share Flat (rental) Public Housing Temporary Housing Family Composition % Living with Father, Mother, Brother(s) and Sister(s) Living with Father, Brother(s) and Sister(s) Living with Mother, Brother(s) and Sister(s) Living with other relatives Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  17. Fig. 3e: Students’ Socio-Economic Status (5) % for the School % for twenty-five secondary schools No. of Family Members (incl. student) % 2 or below 3 4 5 6 7 8 or above Students Newly Arrived from China % 6-7 years 1 year or below 2-3 years 4-5 years Others Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  18. Fig. 3f: Students’ Socio-Economic Status (6) SES Index Distribution of our school SES Index Distribution of 40 schools Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  19. Fig. 4a: Students’ Perception of Parental Styles (1) Degree of Tightness Authoritarian (Power-assertive) Authoritative-reciprocal (High in bi-directional communication) High Neglecting (Ignoring & Uninvolved) Indulgent Low Degree of Acceptance Low High Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  20. Fig. 4b: Students’ Perception of Parental Styles (2) % for the school % for twenty-five secondary schools % Neglecting (Ignoring & Uninvolved Authoritarian (Power-assertive) Indulgent Authoritative-reciprocal (High in bi-directional communication) Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  21. Fig. 4c: Students’ Perception of Parental Styles (3) % of outliers % of others Note: Outliers at 2 s.d. or more % Neglecting (Ignoring & Uninvolved Authoritarian (Power-assertive) Indulgent Authoritative-reciprocal (High in bi-directional communication) Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  22. Fig. 4d: Students’ Perception of Parental Styles (4) % of S1 students % of S2 students % of S3 students % of S4 students % of S5 students % of S6 students % Neglecting (Ignoring & Uninvolved Authoritarian (Power-assertive) Indulgent Authoritative-reciprocal (High in bi-directional communication) Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  23. II. Teachers’ Performance Indicators from CUHK: PI 11: Teachers’ Feelings about School Life PI 13: School Organizational Values PI 14: Organizational Learning

  24. School Mean Fig. 11a: Teachers’ Feelings about School Life (1) Mean for twenty-five secondary schools Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 6 (Strongly Agree). Mean (Agree) (Slightly Agree) (Slightly Disagree) (Disagree) Job Satisfaction Teacher Commitment Sense of Community Students’ Order and Discipline Job Pressure Workload Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  25. Fig. 11b: Teachers’ Feelings about School Life (2) (Strongly Agree) Teacher Distribution (Agree) (Slightly Agree) (Slightly Disagree) (Disagree) (Strongly Disagree) Teacher Commitment Job Satisfaction Sense of Community Students’ Order and Discipline Job Pressure Workload Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  26. Mean of Male Fig. 11c: Teachers’ Feelings about School Life (3) Mean of Female Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 6 (Strongly Agree). Mean (Agree) (Slightly Agree) (Slightly Disagree) (Disagree) Job Satisfaction Teacher Commitment Sense of Community Students’ Order and Discipline Job Pressure Workload Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  27. Fig. 13a : School Organizational Values (1) Mean (Agree) (Slightly Agree) (Slightly Disagree) Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 6 (Strongly Agree). Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  28. Fig. 13b : School Organizational Values (2) Mean (Agree) (Slightly Agree) (Slightly Disagree) Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 6 (Strongly Agree). Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  29. Fig. 13c : School Organizational Values (3) Mean (Agree) (Slightly Agree) (Slightly Disagree) (Disagree) Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 6 (Strongly Agree). Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  30. School Mean Fig. 14a: Organizational Learning (1) Mean for twenty-five secondary schools Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Never) to 6 (Often). Mean (Frequent) (Sometimes) (Few) Personal Mastery Team Learning Systems Thinking Mental Model Shared Vision (Rare) Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  31. Fig. 14b: Organizational Learning (2) (Often) Teacher Distribution (Frequent) (Sometimes) (Few) (Rare) (Never) Personal Mastery Mental Model Shared Vision Team Learning Systems Thinking Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  32. Mean of Male Fig. 14c: Organizational Learning (3) Mean of Female Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Never) to 6 (Often). Mean (Frequent) (Sometimes) (Few) Personal Mastery Team Learning Systems Thinking Mental Model Shared Vision (Rare) Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  33. III. Parents’ Performance Indicators from CUHK: PI 32: Parents’ Perception of the School

  34. School Mean Fig. 32a: Parents’ Perception of the School (1) Mean for twenty-five secondary schools Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 6 (Strongly Agree). (Agree) Mean (Slightly Agree) (Slightly Disagree) (Disagree) Student Care School Facilities Parent-School Collaboration Study Pressure* School Ethos Students’ Sense of Belonging School Effectiveness (*Negative Domain) Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  35. Fig. 32b: Parents’ Perception of the School (2) (Strongly Agree) Parents’ Distribution (Agree) (Slightly Agree) (Slightly Disagree) (Disagree) (Strongly Disagree) School Effective -ness Study Pressure* School Ethos Parent -School Collaboration Student Care School Facilities Students’ Sense of Belonging (*Negative Domain) Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  36. Mean of Parents of S1 Fig. 32c: Parents’ Perception of the School (3) Mean of Parents of S2 Mean of Parents of S3 Note: The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 6 (Strongly Agree). Mean of Parents of S4 Mean of Parents of S5 Mean of Parents of S6 Mean (Agree) (Slightly Agree) (Slightly Disagree) (Disagree) Student Care School Facilities Parent-School Collaboration Study Pressure* School Ethos Students’ Sense of Belonging School Effectiveness (*Negative Domain) Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

  37. Appendix: “Performance Indicators” Survey Record Project of “School Self-evaluation, External Review and Sustainability” Wah Yan College, Kowloon

More Related