1 / 11

Enhancing Registrar Engagement with the UK Renal Registry: Insights and Opportunities

This presentation by Dr. Rishi Pruthi at the 2013 UK Renal Registry Annual Audit Meeting addresses the importance of registrar involvement in the registry. It discusses current misconceptions and the necessity for better engagement to improve understanding and appreciation of the registry's relevance. The talk highlights research areas, changing trends, and future developments, emphasizing mixed methods and collaboration with leading institutions. By fostering a supportive environment and promoting effective communication, we can enhance opportunities for registrars in their training.

jaime-boyle
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing Registrar Engagement with the UK Renal Registry: Insights and Opportunities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WHAT DO REGISTRARS WANT? Dr Rishi PruthiClinical Research Fellow UK Renal Registry 2013 Annual Audit Meeting

  2. Introduction Want: ‘to feel a need or desire for’ Lack of appreciation of registry amongst registrars Uncertainty about its relevance Misconceptions Need for engagement Improve understanding and knowledge of registry 2

  3. Aim Current level of involvement of registrars at the registry Areas of research and changing trends Changing profile of SpRs Future developments Opportunities for external SpRs 2

  4. Research Stand alone studies Higher degrees Understanding Centre variation in achieving audit standards for calcium phosphate and PTH Impact of social deprivation and ethnicity on access to RRT Inequity in access to transplantation Patient survival post graft failure Practice patterns associated with home modalities uptake Primarily Quantitative studies Using UKRR data 2

  5. Newer datasets MINAP HES ATTOM GPRD 2

  6. Methodology Embracing qualitative research and mixed methods approach Focus groups Scoping Interviews Delphi Process/consensus Semi-structured interviews In-depth Interviews 2

  7. Changing profile of SpRs Increased flexibility Embracing modern communication methods No longer Bristol / Regional centric Registrars able to maintain local clinical work and participate in local on call rotas whilst working at the registry 2

  8. Future Improvements More collaboration with institutes with known record of excellence in epidemiological research Bristol University, LSHTM & University of Southampton Ensuring delivery of PhDs/MDs Development of renal epidemiology program Working with other organisations to improve data sharing/merging Maintaining and further development of trend to use mixed methods approach 2

  9. Interaction with SpRs in training Data queries Assistance with local audits Supporting innovative research ideas Study Groups Prompt review of data-requests Assistance in developing research networks Genuinely helpful staff Keen to listen 2

  10. Concluding remarks Diverse range of research & Mixed methods approach Flexibility Formalisation of working relationships and increased accountability Significant opportunities for registrars in training Improved awareness mutually beneficial for registry Need to engage with Registrars Informally locally (consultants) Formally (training days, SpR Club) Promoting attendance at Annual Audit day meeting 2

  11. Any questions rishi.pruthi@nbt.nhs.uk

More Related