1 / 21

Denny Vitasari, Paul Grassia , Peter Martin Foam and Minimal Surface, 24 – 28 February 2014

Surface viscous effect on surfactant transport onto a foam lamella. Denny Vitasari, Paul Grassia , Peter Martin Foam and Minimal Surface, 24 – 28 February 2014. Background – Foam fractionation. Foam fractionation : Separation of surface active material using rising column of foam.

jamar
Télécharger la présentation

Denny Vitasari, Paul Grassia , Peter Martin Foam and Minimal Surface, 24 – 28 February 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Surface viscous effect on surfactant transport onto a foam lamella Denny Vitasari, Paul Grassia, Peter Martin Foam and Minimal Surface, 24 – 28 February 2014

  2. Background – Foam fractionation • Foam fractionation: • Separation of surface active material using rising column of foam. • Foam fractionation column with reflux: • Some of the top product is returned to the column Transport of surfactant onto the film interface determines the efficiency of a foam fractionation column.

  3. Foam structure – Dry foam Plateau border: three lamellae meet at 120 to form an edge Lamella: thin film separating the air bubbles within foam.

  4. 2D illustration of a foam lamella • Due to reflux, the surface tension at the Plateau border is lower than that at the lamella  transport of surfactant from the surface of Plateau border to the surface of film  Marangoni effect. • Pressure in the Plateau border is lower due to curvature (Young-Laplace law) suction of liquid to the Plateau border  film drainage. • Surface viscous effecttakes place and opposes surface motion.

  5. Aim Modelling the surface velocity profile and the surfactant transport onto a foam lamella in the presence of surface viscous stress.

  6. Surface velocity profile Surface velocity film drainage Marangoni effect surface viscous effect

  7. Case without film drainage Simplification as benchmark for the real system Dimensionless surface velocity: surface viscous effect Marangoni effect

  8. Illustration of a lamella and Plateau border Boundary condition:

  9. Parameters for simulation Foam film made from solution of Bovine serum albumin (BSA) with cosurfactant propylene glycol alginate (PGA) (Durand and Stone, 2006)

  10. Key parameters • (dimensionless surface viscosity parameter) is a key parameter to determine the effect of surface viscosity upon the system. • (dimensionless radius of curvature of Plateau border relative to film length) determines magnitude of surface velocity near the Plateau border, hence the rate of surfactant transport onto the film.

  11. Surface velocity: very small s Effect of surface viscosity only at the boundary layer near Plateau border Special case where δ0s Surface movement slows down due to surface viscosity.

  12. Surface velocity:very small s Jump of attoat With very small δ0s the surface velocity profile represents a Dirac delta function at Solution using Green’s function: • Largest magnitude of surface velocity at the jump point. • Surface viscous effect reduces peak surface velocity. • Flux near Plateau border in the absence of local Marangoni force there.

  13. Surface velocity:very small s Jump of attoat • Value of relative to determines the perturbation of surface velocity near Plateau border: •  upward perturbation from •  downward perturbation from

  14. Surface velocity:very small s Jump of attoat is shifted along the lamella length. The location of the largest magnitude of surface velocity shifts as the jump point shifts.

  15. Surface velocity:very small s Jump of attoat • Value of relative to determines the perturbation of surface velocity near Plateau border: •  upward perturbation from •  downward perturbation from

  16. General solution for arbitrary Differential equation Integration of the Green’s function  The Green’s function is easier to obtain when is small but more complicated to obtain when is larger. Finite difference approximation  Applicable for arbitrary s

  17. Surface velocity profile • The turn around of surface velocity is less sharp at a later time due to surfactant surface concentration gradients being spread over larger distances, implying also a weaker Marangoni effect. • Weaker Marangoni effect results in lower surface velocity.

  18. Surfactant transport via material point method • Surface velocity () applies on every material point. • Surface excess () averaged between two material points. • Plot vs position • Surfactant is conserved between material points  rectangle area preserved.

  19. Evolution of surfactant surface concentration With surface viscosity Without surface viscosity

  20. Conclusions • In the absence of film drainage, surface viscous effect balances the Marangoni force and slows down the surface movement. • Jump of surfactant surface concentration: • Largest magnitude of surface velocity at the jump point. • Surface movement delocalized away from Marangoni surface tension gradients due to surface viscous effect (delocalisation distance ) • Critical radius of curvature of Plateau border: • ~ : magnitude of surface velocity greatly reduced by requirement to satisfy symmetry condition on midpoint of Plateau border face. • In the presence of surface viscosity, the surface concentration of surfactant at a given time is lower than that without surface viscosity.

  21. Thank you

More Related