1 / 94

Chapter 53

Chapter 53. comm Ecology. Overview: What Is a comm?. biological community- pop’s of various spp living close enough for potential interaxn Animals & plants surrounding a watering hole in southern Africa are members of a savanna comm.

Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 53

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 53 comm Ecology

  2. Overview: What Is a comm? • biological community- pop’s of various spp living close enough for potential interaxn • Animals & plants surrounding a watering hole in southern Africa are members of a savanna comm

  3. Concept 53.1: A community’s interactions include competition, predation, herbivory, symbiosis, & disease • relationships b/w spp in a comm are interspecific interactions • Interspecific interactions affect spp survival & reproduction • Ex’s: competition, predation, herbivory, symbiosis (parasitism, mutualism, & commensalism), & disease

  4. Competition • Interspecific competition- spp compete for a resource in short supply • Strong competition can lead to competitive exclusion, local elimination of a competing spp

  5. The Competitive Exclusion Principle • The competitive exclusion principle- 2 spp competing for same limiting resources can’t occupy the same niche

  6. Ecological Niches • ecological niche- total of a spp’ use of biotic & abiotic resources • Ecologically similar spp can coexist in a comm if there are 1 or more significant diff's in their niches • As a result of competition, a spp’ fundamental niche may differ from its realized niche

  7. LE 53-2 High tide High tide Chthamalus Chthamalus realized niche Balanus Chthamalus fundamental niche Balanus realized niche Ocean Ocean Low tide Low tide

  8. Resource Partitioning • Resource partitioning- differentiation of ecological niches, enabling similar spp to coexist in a comm

  9. LE 53-3 A. insolitus usually perches on shady branches. A. ricordii A. insolitus A. distichus perches on fence posts & other sunny surfaces. A. aliniger A. christophei A. distichus A. cybotes A. etheridgei

  10. Character Displacement • Character displacement- tendency for char’s to be more divergent in sympatric pop's of 2 spp than in allopatric pop's of the same 2 spp • An example is variation in beak size b/w pop's of 2 spp of Galapagos finches

  11. LE 53-4 G. fortis G. fuliginosa Beak depth Santa María, San Cristóbal Sympatric pop's 40 20 0 Los Hermanos Percentage of indiv's in each size class 40 G. fuliginosa, allopatric 20 0 Daphne 40 G. fortis, allopatric 20 0 14 10 16 12 8 Beak depth (mm)

  12. Predation • Predation- 1 spp, (predator), kills & eats the other, the prey • Some feeding adaptations of predators are claws, teeth, fangs, stingers, & poison

  13. Prey display various defensive adaptations • Behavioral defenses include hiding, fleeing, self-defense, & alarm calls • Animals also have morphological & physiological defense adaptations

  14. Cryptic coloration/camouflage- makes prey difficult to spot Video: Seahorse Camouflage

  15. aposematic coloration- animals w/ effective chem defense often exhibit bright warning coloration • Predators are particularly cautious in dealing w/ prey that display such coloration

  16. In some cases, a prey spp may gain significant protection by mimicking the appearance of another spp

  17. Batesian mimicry- palatable or harmless spp mimics an unpalatable or harmful model

  18. LE 53-7 Green parrot snake Hawkmoth larva

  19. Müllerian mimicry- 2 or more unpalatable spp resemble each other

  20. LE 53-8 Cuckoo bee Yellow jacket

  21. Herbivory • Herbivory refers to an interaction in which an herbivore eats parts of a plant or alga • It has led to evolution of plant mechanical & chemical defenses & adaptations by herbivores

  22. Parasitism • In parasitism, 1 organism, the parasite, derives nourishment from another organism, its host, which is harmed in the process • Parasitism exerts substantial influence on pop's & the structure of communities

  23. Disease • Effects of disease on pop's & communities are similar to those of parasites • Pathogens, disease-causing agents, are typically bacteria, viruses, or protists

  24. Mutualism • Mutualistic symbiosis, or mutualism, is an interspecific interaction that benefits both spp Video: Clownfish & Anemone

  25. Commensalism • In commensalism, 1 spp benefits & the other is apparently unaffected • Commensal interactions are hard to document in nature because any close association of 2 spp likely affects both

  26. Interspecific Interactions & Adaptation • Coevolution- reciprocal evolutionary adaptations of 2 interacting spp • The term is often used too loosely in describing adaptations within a comm • There is little evidence for true coevolution in most interspecific interactions

  27. Concept 53.2: Dominant & keystone spp exert strong controls on comm structure • In general, a few spp in a comm exert strong control on that community’s structure • 2 fundamental features of comm structure are spp diversity & feeding relationships

  28. spp Diversity • spp diversity of a comm is the variety of organisms that make up the comm • It has 2 components: spp richness & relative abundance • spp richness- total # of diff spp in the comm • Relative abundance- proportion each spp represents of the total indiv's in the comm

  29. 2 communities can have the same spp richness but a different relative abundance • A comm w/ an even spp abundance is more diverse than one in which one or 2 spp are abundant & the remainder are rare

  30. LE 53-11 A B C D comm 1 C: 25% A: 25% D: 25% B: 25% comm 2 C: 5% A: 80% D: 10% B: 5%

  31. Trophic Structure • Trophic structure- feeding relationships b/w organisms in a comm • It is a key factor in comm dynamics • Food chains link trophic levels from producers to top carnivores Video: Shark Eating a Seal

  32. LE 53-12 Quaternary consumers Carnivore Carnivore Tertiary consumers Carnivore Carnivore Secondary consumers Carnivore Carnivore Primary consumers Herbivore Zooplankton Primary producers Plant Phytoplankton A terrestrial food chain A marine food chain

  33. Food Webs • food web- branching food chain w/ complex trophic interactions

  34. LE 53-13 Humans Smaller toothed whales Sperm whales Baleen whales Elephant seals Leopard seals Crab-eater seals Fishes Squids Birds Carnivorous plankton Euphausids (krill) Copepods Phyto- plankton

  35. Food webs can be simplified by isolating a portion of a comm that interacts very little w/ the rest of the comm

  36. LE 53-14 Sea nettle Juvenile striped bass Fish larvae Zooplankton Fish eggs

  37. Limits on Food Chain Length • Each food chain in a food web is usually only a few links long • 2 hypotheses attempt to explain food chain length: the energetic hypothesis & the dynamic stability hypothesis

  38. The energetic hypothesis suggests that length is limited by inefficient energy transfer • The dynamic stability hypothesis proposes that long food chains are less stable than short ones • Most data support the energetic hypothesis

  39. LE 53-15 6 6 No. of spp 5 5 No. of trophic links 4 4 # of spp # of trophic links 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 Medium Low High (control) Productivity

  40. spp w/ a Large Impact • Certain spp have a very large impact on comm structure • Such spp are highly abundant or play a pivotal role in comm dynamics

  41. Dominant spp • Dominant spp- most abundant or have the highest biomass • They exert powerful control over the occurrence & distribution of other spp

  42. One hypothesis suggests that dominant spp are most competitive in exploiting resources • Another hypothesis is that they are most successful at avoiding predators

  43. Keystone spp • In contrast to dominant spp, • keystone spp- not necessarily abundant in a comm but exert strong control on a comm by their ecological roles, or niches

  44. Field studies of sea stars exhibit their role as a keystone spp in intertidal communities

More Related