SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Comprehensive Guide to Evidence-Based Practice Models and Implementation

jamesttorres avatar
11 diapositives · 180 Views · Jan 04, 2020

Explore the STAR model of Evidence-Based Practice, clinical effectiveness of EBP, barriers to translation, rating system for grading evidence levels, and Johns Hopkins model for EBP implementation. Understand how to formulate practice questions, gather evidence, translate recommendations, implement changes, evaluate outcomes, and communicate findings effectively.

Comprehensive Guide to Evidence-Based Practice Models and Implementation - slide 1
01 / 11Comprehensive Guide to Evidence-Based Practice Models and Implementation
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Comprehensive Guide to Evidence-Based Practice Models and Implementation
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Evidence-Based Practice

  2. Evidence-Based Practice The Star Model

  3. Evidence-Based Practice • Discovery – multitude of articles • Summary – systematic reviews • Translation – clinical recommendations • Integration – change in practice • Evaluation – change in health outcomes

  4. Clinical Effectiveness of EBP • Feasibility – is it practical • Appropriateness – does it fit situation • Meaningfulness – opinions, values, beliefs • Effectiveness – best available evidence, not necessarily the best possible

  5. Barriers to Translating Evidence into Practice • Financial disincentives • Lack of skills, facilities or equipment • “Standard of Care” based on consensus • Lack of knowledge – persons or experts • Belief that “Guidelines” are cookbooks • Misinformed lay public

  6. Rating System for Grading Levels of Evidence • Level I • Multiple randomized controlled trials • Randomized trials with large sample sizes and large effect sizes • Level II • Evidence from at least one well-designed RCT • Single randomized trials with small samples

  7. Rating System for Grading Levels of Evidence • Level III • IIIA • Evidence from well-designed trials without randomization • IIIB • Evidence from studies of intact groups • Ex-post facto and causal comparative studies • Case/control or cohort studies

  8. Rating System for Grading Levels of Evidence • IIIC • Evidence obtained from time series with and without an intervention • Single experimental or quasi-experimental studies with dramatic effect sizes • Level IV • Evidence from integrative reviews • Systematic reviews of qualitative or descriptive studies • Case series, uncontrolled studies, expert opinion

  9. Johns Hopkins Model of EBP Implementation • Practice Question • Identify an EBP question • Define scope of practice question • Assign responsibility for leadership • Recruit a multidisciplinary team • Schedule a team conference

  10. Johns Hopkins Model of EBP Implementation • Evidence • Conduct internal and external search for evidence • Critique types of evidence • Summarize evidence • Rate strength of evidence • Develop recommendations for change in processes of care or systems based on strength of evidence

  11. Johns Hopkins Model of EBP Implementation • Translation • Determine appropriateness and feasibility of translating recommendation into the specific practice setting • Create an action plan • Implement the change • Evaluate the outcomes • Report the results of the preliminary outcomes to decision makers • Secure the support from the decision makers to implement recommended change internally • Identify the next steps • Communicate the findings