Kansas State Report Card November 2013 (revised December 5 th )

1. Kansas State Report Card November 2013(revised December 5th)

2. Kansas Student Population Trends(Percent of K-12, September Unaudited Enrollment, Public Schools)

3. Details of Student Population Trends

4. Subjects Assessed • 261,164 Reading (Grades 3-8, HS) • 260,653 Math (Grades 3-8, HS) • 110,482 Science (Grades 4, 7, HS) • 48,717 KELPA (Grades K-12 )

5. Early Comments on Results Graduation rates continue to increase, up from 83% to 84.9%, with the largest gains in our subgroups. Attendance rates are high at 94.9% Participation rates on assessments remain very close to 100%. For a second year in a row, student performance on state Math and Reading assessments declined.

6. Reading

7. Five Performance Levels Exemplary Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Approaches Standard Academic Warning

8. Reporting “Standard & Above” • Reported percentages are totals of all students in the top three performance levels. Example from Reading, All Students: • Exemplary . . . . . . . 29.9 • Exceeds Standard . . 29.5 • Meets Standard . . . 25.3 % at Standard or Above = 84.7

9. Reading Trends by Percent Proficient, All Students, Report Card Population

10. Reading – Performance Levels

11. Disaggregated Groups All students Males & females Ethnic groups Free & reduced lunch Students with disabilities English Language Learners

12. Reading Gap by Percent Proficient, SES levels, 2000 – 2013, (report card population)

13. Reading Gaps by Percent Proficient & Ethnicity: 2000 – 2013(percent proficient, all grades, report card population)

14. Math

15. Math Percent Proficient, All Students, Report Card Population

16. Math – Performance Levels

17. Math Gap by Percent Proficient, SES levels,2000 – 2013, (report card population)

18. Math Gap by Percent Proficient & Ethnicity, 2000 – 2012(report card population)

19. AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) is replaced with 4 AMO’s (Annual Measurable Objective’s) 1- Achievement measured by the API = Assessment Performance Index 2- Growth 3- Gap 4- Reducing % Non-Proficient (RNP)

20. To encourage staff to help each student to the highest performance level possible, the new achievement measure awards 250 points each time a student moves up a proficiency level.

21. How is the API calculated?

23. Reading results using the new AMO Measures.

24. Reading Gap Measured by the API, 2009 – 2013, (all grades, report card population)

25. Reducing the Percent Non-Proficient, Reading, Free & Reduced Trends, (report card population)

26. Trends, Reducing the Percent Non-Proficient, Reading, by Ethnicity,(report card population)

27. Reducing the Percent Non-Proficient, ELL & Students w/ Disabilities Trends, (report card population) 27

28. Math Results using the new AMO measures.

29. Math Gap Measured by the API, 2009 – 2013, (report card population)

30. Math Gap by Reducing Non-Proficient, Free & Reduced combined, 2009 – 2013, (report card population)

31. Trends, Reducing the Percent Non-Proficient by Ethnicity, 2009-2013(report card population)

32. State Subgroup Performance in Reducing the Percent Non-Proficient in Reading:

34. New, non-overlapping subgroup built for the ESEA waiver:The lowest-scoring 30 percent. Several advantages: Students are only counted once. Less bias against larger, more diverse schools. Stigma against particular groups reduced. All schools are compelled to help their lowest performing students. This measure captures more subgroup population students.

36. Reading Gap Trends as Measured by the Lowest Performing 30 Percent’s API:(report card population)

37. Math Gap Trends as Measured by the Lowest Performing 30 Percent’s API: (report card population)

38. Kansas Growth AMO: a relative measure To make the growth AMO, a school had to be at or above the 50th percentile

39. Expectations Under the New Measures: Must make at least one of the 4 AMOs (achievement, gap reduction, reducing the percent below proficient, or growth) in reading and math Participation must be ≥ 95% for All Students & all subgroups K-8 schools must meet Attendance Requirements If high school, must make graduation goals for All Students & All Subgroups

40. Overall Results Under the New Measures: All Schools 561 of 1,379 schools made progress. 40.7% 818 schools did not. 59.3% Title I schools: 205 made progress. 37% 349 did not. 63% Non-Title schools: 356 schools made progress. 43% 469 schools did not. 57%

41. Numbers of Schools Making Their Measurable Objectives:

42. Graduation Results: 383 high schools 365 made the graduation goals 18 did not

43. State Subgroup Performance in Reducing the Percent Non-Proficient in Math:

44. Science – Grades Tested Grade 4 Grade 7 High School

45. Science

46. Science Percent Proficient, All Students, Report Card Population

47. Science – Performance Levels

48. Highly Qualified Teachers • To be highly qualified, a teacher must be “fully” licensed & must demonstrate subject matter competence. • Competence is demonstrated by: • Content major, or • PRAXIS II content test, or • Rubric (content hours, content workshops, experience & other PD related to content area).

49. Highly Qualified Teachers

50. Percent of Classes Taught byHighly Qualified Teachers