1 / 24

SSP vs Galaxies

Galaxy: Complex chemistry Age distribution. Differential extinction In space In age. Held et al 04. SSP vs Galaxies. SSP: Chemically Homogeneous Coheval Seldom affected by differential extintion Single IMF. Variable IMF ?. S: stellar birth rate

jasia
Télécharger la présentation

SSP vs Galaxies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Galaxy: • Complex chemistry • Age distribution • Differential extinction • In space • In age Held et al 04 SSP vs Galaxies • SSP: • Chemically Homogeneous • Coheval • Seldom affected by differential • extintion • Single IMF • Variable IMF ?

  2. S: stellar birth rate fl: star(M,t,Z) spectrum Without dust a bare integral ! All difficulties in St. Evol. And St. Atmosph. !! If S=y(t)*f(m)(Bruzual 86) then integrate SSP instead of single stars ! y(t) & Z(t) provided by chemical evolution Chemo-Spectrophotometric Population Synthesis First consistent chemo + stellar evolution + spectral code by Bressan et al 94 Many other synth. tools, e.g. Bruzual & Charlot 90-06…, Jimenez et al 00… etc..

  3. CHEMICAL EVOLUTION OF GALAXIES • A simple model: • Close model (no inflow and/or outflow of gas) • IMF constant in time • Instantaneous mixing of ejected material • Initial gas is primordial Initial conditions

  4. E(t): the rate of gas ejection by dying stars mr is the mass of the remnant tm is the lifetime of the star with mass m EZ(t): the rate of metal ejection by dying stars pZm : mass fraction of newly produced and ejected elements

  5. Instantaneous Recycling Appr. • Stars with mass < mI (=1 MŸ) never day tm = ∞ • Stars with mass ≥ mI have negligible lifetime tm = 0 • R is the mass returned to the ISM by a simple stellar population • R is constant as long as mr does not depend on Z

  6. NOTE: Independent from the mass of the galaxy Other physics needed to interpret Z-Mass relations For Z << 1:

  7. For a more detailed description: • Stellar Evolution: • lifetimes • detailed ejecta (vs. mass & composition, SNIa) • Gas: • mixing processes, inflow & outflow, heating and cooling • Stellar birthrate: • star formation efficiency & IMF • (e.g. revs. by Matteucci 03, Pagel 03)

  8. StellarYields From Portinari et al 98 NS RM Yields computed adopting ejecta (Mo) vs MCOof Woosley &Weaver 95

  9. SN Ia yields Element M/Mo Nomoto et al 84

  10. Observations: Thin & Thick Disk A04 = AllendePrieto et al. (2004) B03 = Bensby et al. (2003) B04a= Bensby et al. (2004)C00 = Chen et al. (2000) E93= Edvardsson et al. (1993)F00 = Fulbright (2000) G03= Gratton et al. (2003)M04 = Mishenina et al. (2004) N97 = Nissen & Schuster (1997)P00 = Prochaska et al.(2000) R03 = Reddy et al. (2003) (from Soubiran & Girard 05)

  11. Linear Trends • For the thin disk : • [Mg/Fe]=-0.37[Fe/H]-0.040 s =0.067 dex • [a/Fe]=-0.29[Fe/H]-0.029 s =0.052 dex • For the thick disk : • [Mg/Fe]=-0.41[Fe/H]+0.097, s =0.092 dex • [a/Fe]=-0.30[Fe/H]+0.071, s =0.069 dex (from Soubiran & Girard 05)

  12. Observations and Chemical Ev. Model for Solar Vicinity Chemo-kinematical parameters for 424 stars Rocha-Pinto et al. 04

  13. Cayrel et al 00 Need some Yield adjustement !!!! corrected

  14. Caffau et al. 06

  15. With detailed SFR & chemistry • Gas fraction and Z • dust fraction • SNIa, Ib/c and II rates • SNIIs allow prediction of radio emission • Detailed abundance of gas going into SF(t) • effects of enhancement in norrow band indices

  16. (Panuzzo et al 06) NGC4435 • NGC4435 is an SB0(7) in interaction with NGC4438 (spiral): nearest passage about 100 Myr ago(Vollmer et al 05) • MBH by Coccato et al 05 • Opt. Pop. Study by Sarzi et al 05 • MIR spectrum typical of a star forming object (spiral NGC7331)

  17. GRASIL FIT OLD MC Diffuse dust NGC 4435 UV+NIR+MIR+FIR + RadioOLD+Starburst

  18. Best fit model of central 5” with GRASIL (Silva et al 98, Vega et al 05) Old M ~ 8 109M⊙ Age ~ 9 Gyr Z = 0.02 Young: post starburstwith residual SFR~0.07 M⊙/yr Age~ 180 Myr <SFR>~0.7 M⊙/yr MBURST~ 1.2 108M⊙~ 1.5% MGAL (5 arcsec) PAH model (Li & Draine 01, Vega et al 05) needs revison above 14 mm

  19. Today more complex models • Multi-phase models (heating, cooling of gas) • Semi-analitic models (Durham, Munich, etc..) • Effects of dust reprocessing (e.g. GRASIL) • Galaxy-AGN co-evolution (e.g. Granato et al 04)

  20. SSP in the MIR 10µm bump:Dusty AGB envelopes ? • O-rich SSP models (Bressan et al 98) • The emission feature is very similar to observed O-rich AGB outfows (ISO, Molster et al. 2000)

  21. Emission Lines 2 galaxies (12%) N4636[NeII]12.8 mm [NeIII]15.5 mm [SIII]18.7 mm N4486[ArII]7 mm [NeII]12.8 mm [NeIII]15.5 mm [SIII]18.7 mm ( M87 )

  22. PAHs 2 Galaxies (12%) N45506.2, 7.7, 8.6, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7mm N44356.2, 7.7, 8.6, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7, 16.4mm also [ArII]7 mm, [NeII]12.8 mm, [NeIII]15.5 mm, H2S(1)17.04 mm [SIII]18.7 mm

  23. Total fluxes Total fluxes Nuclear Fluxes Nuclear Fluxes M87 a young nuclear population?

More Related