1 / 41

Status report on ECAL

Status report on ECAL. TIM , Houston 8-12 Jan 2007 Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa for the ECAL group. IHEP Beijing, China (Group Leader : Hesheng Chen). INFN Pisa, Italy (Group Leader : F Cervelli). LAPP Annecy , France France (Group Leader: JP Vialle). International ECAL collaboration.

jason
Télécharger la présentation

Status report on ECAL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status report on ECAL TIM , Houston 8-12 Jan 2007 Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa for the ECAL group

  2. IHEP Beijing, China (Group Leader : Hesheng Chen) INFN Pisa, Italy (Group Leader : F Cervelli) LAPP Annecy , France France(Group Leader: JP Vialle) International ECAL collaboration Project responsible : F. Cervelli Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  3. Where is ECAL Minimum amount of material (X0): • Last detector crossed by incoming (downgoing) particles • Thick detector in which particles interact in a destructive way 0.20 0.28 Upper TOF 0.32 Tracker Entry 0.40 Tracker Total 0.04 16.5 Tracker Exit ECAL Entry ECAL Total 16.1 ECAL Exit Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  4. ECAL = Electromagnet CALorimeter • A CALorimeter is a thick chunk of material in which particles deposit (part of) their energy (CÁLOR=heatenergy) • Most ground based experiments have large calorimetric systems CMS Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  5. fit Energy resolution (%) Energy deposited (GeV/layer) 50 GeV e- Some advantages of calorimeters • Resolution improves with the particle energy, differently from trackers in which resolution  momentum • Energy loss due to finite dimensions scales with the logarythm of the particle energy (therefore very slowly) Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa Longitudinal layer number

  6. Disadvantages of calorimeters • They are heavy! • Very different interaction cross sections for “light particles” (photons, electrons, positrons) wrt “heavy particles” (protons, deuterons, nuclei) • Often, in ground experiments, 2 calorimetric sections are foreseen CDF @ Fermilab ECAL : electromagnetic section HCAL : hadronic section Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  7. Calorimetry in space • due to limitations in weight, space experiments have just an ECAL section, normally with limited thickness • Standard measurement for “thickness” is the radiation length (X0) which is related to the development of the energy deposition by a particle • a detector with high X0 has a good energy and angular resolution and it is capable of measuring particles in the energy range 10GeV-1TeV with good accuracy (<5%) • e.g. : • AGILE : 1.5X0 • GLAST 10X0 • AMS-02 : 16.1 X0 Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  8. AMS ECAL • Thanks to the characteristics of the ISS (and of the Space Shuttle) AMS02 can take advantage of a calorimeter of unprecedented thickness and granularity, for space standards Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  9. Physics with ECAL • Very good positron/proton discrimination • Good energy reolution for positrons and photons up to ~1TeV • Detection of photons non-interacting in material above (~75% of the total) • Discrimination of nuclei Z by energy deposition • Trigger information on photons and on e± e+, p ? g

  10. Dark Matter searches in positrons • ~30% of the universe is made of matter of unknown origin: DARK MATTER • Most theories predict a surplus in the production of positrons, due to DARK MATTER • Hints from HEAT and AMS-01 • AMS-02 can measure this distribution with very small statistical error (<0.1%) … BUT … Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  11. …background subtraction • …BUT… what about systematic error? • A particular concern is the “background subtraction” • Proton flux higher by 104 ; to measure positrons at 1% need suppression factor of 106 • TRD provides a factor 102:103 • The ECAL standalone provides a factor 103 • Including the energy-momentum match, a further factor 10 is gained protons positrons Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  12. g g Photons can be detected in AMS field of view by two devices • TRACKER: uses conversion in 0.25X0 TRD material (max opening angle ~40o; conversion probability ~18%) • ECAL: uses the shower shape and asks for no hits in TOF counters (opening angle ~20o ; ~78% of the photons reach ECAL) e+ e- Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  13. ECAL structure • Sampling calorimeter with lead foils and scintillating fibers • Basic block is superlayer: 11 lead and 10 fiber layers • 9 superlayers with alternating x and y readout • Total thickness is 166mm, corresponding to 16.2 X0 • Total weight 634 kg p e Lead foil (1mm) Fibers (1mm) z 1.73mm particle direction FIBER LEAD y x

  14. Supporting structure and readout of AMS ECAL • The active part is inserted in a supporting structure which connects ECAL to USS • Light is readout with PhotoMultiplierTubes (PMTs) connected to fibers through light guides x y z 66 cm 18.5 mm Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  15. Pictures of ECAL production ECAL Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  16. Status of construction in short • Flight hardware: • detector : ready • front end electronics : ready and mounted on detector • readout electronics : QM tested, FM under construction, ready by end of April 2007 (boards + mechanics) • must undergo SQ tests (vibration + thermo-vacuum) • HV power supply : ready except for heaters and thermostats • must undergo SQ tests (vibration + thermo-vacuum) • LV power supply : under construction in Taiwan Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  17. Detector + front end electronics • Completed in September 2006 • Tested in CERN North Area experimental hall Oct 15-30 with protons of 150GeV and electrons of 6-210 GeV • Currently stored in class 100K clean area Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  18. Readout electronics : FM • Production started november, 2006 • Check of drawings : ok • Check of material : • PCBs all done • Electrical components all in stock except for few connectors to be soldered on ECAL Back Plane (EBP) • Mechanical parts front panels done and anodized; to be treated with alodine for conductivity. • Crate production in Pisa: Feb,1  May,1 . • Surface treatment (white paint): May,1  May,15 Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  19. 3 EBP (backplane), 2FM+1FS , mounted and inspected  to be tested in Pisa • All electronics ready by end of April Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  20. HV power supply Flight HV ready and mounted on temporary stand Missing parts: heaters (2) thermostats (4) reflecting tape Offer requests sent this week to CGS 3/4 months for delivery Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  21. LowVoltage: ERPD crate • FM • Electronics: • DC/DC were tested in Taiwan by J. Marin. • Board with failures repaired by CAEN now at CIEMAT (Madrid). • Ready to be sent to Taiwan for final test and coating. • Mechanics: • Items 5,6,7 ready • Material for the rest of items 1,2,3,4 sent to IAC. Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  22. ECAL test beam • ECAL mounted on rotating table and carried to CERN • ECAL FM has been mounted on a frame and equipped with FM or QM electronics; work done at LAPP, Annecy (FR) on sep-oct 2006 Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  23. ECAL at test beam • ECAL in the test beam area covered to protect flight hardware (color chosen by Sylvie…) Incoming beam Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  24. Not only ECAL test beam ECAL Tracker: 4 ladders Ecrate 0 Cherenkov counters Trigger counters Ecrate 1 NIM crate NIM LVDS JTBOX JLV1 JINJ PCI AMSWIRE JTCRATE Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  25. A complex DAQ system • Software for readout written by Stefano Di Falco with the help, or based on the programs, of P.Azzarello (Perugia), D.Haas (Geneve), A.Kounine (MIT), A.Lebedev (MIT) • Request from Helsinky University of Technology (Finland) to provide raw data taken at test beam in order to test data transfer with real AMS data E0-crate E1-crate T-crate E T R G J I N F E T R G J I N F J I N F 8 AMSWire cables 10 m long E T S H W E I R T N C E H T J L V 1 J T B X J I N J JT-crate PCI-AMSWIRE 2 AMSWire cables Ethernet Cable 50 m PARALLEL PORT EPPCAN Linux PC Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa External Trigger

  26. Trigger system : rather elaborate! Internal oscillator: pedestals evaluation (asynchronous trigger) “TOF” window: used by external scintillator counters Fast trigger window: ECAL, counters, Cherenkov Level 1 window Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  27. Main goal of test beam: ECAL calibration • To “calibrate” ECAL means to know its response to an impinging particle of known energy • We use “Minimum Ionizing Particles” (MIPs) : hadrons, tipically protons, or muons (cosmic rays at sea level) which cross ECAL without interacting with the lead nuclei but just with the external electrons of the material • Trajectory and energy of MIPs are marginally modified by this process: a MIP proton deposits 0.125GeV crossing ECAL. MIP Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  28. MIP cross scan 4 rows • Proton runs with 20k events along y and x axis • Each run hits the center of a PMT column • Total of 72 runs per each cross (12 hours of data taking) • 4 MIP scans: • Nominal voltage • Nominal voltage+50Volts • Nominal voltage • Nominal voltage+80Volts • Changing voltage varies signal amplification 5 rows x y Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  29. MIP distribution • Typical distribution of energy deposited by a MIP in an ECAL cell, in ADC counts, fitted with a Landau distribution • The different peak position reflects the different voltage (=amplification) • Note that a too large amplification limits the dynamical rangeof the amplifier Nominal HV Peak = 17.2 ADCcounts Nominal HV + 50Volts Peak = 32.7 ADCcounts Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  30. Mip distribution • Problem in “zero suppression” algorythm • We know how to fix this software problem; new software tested with cosmic rays MIP peak (ADC counts) Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  31. Beam profile using tracker layers • 4 tracker ladders, in front of ECAL, have been used to measure the beam profile and to know the particle hit position event by event • The beam profile changes with particle type (electrons vs protons), beam energy, primary beam polarity, … • Beam dimensions ~2×2cm2; each strip is ~100mm BLACK = 3 ladders RED = 4 ladders 1 cm BLACK = 3 ladders RED = 4 ladders 1 cm Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  32. Tracker-ECAL correlation Beam profile : yview Beam profile : xview ECAL cells Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa 0.9cm : ECAL cell size

  33. Testing the trigger • ECAL trigger • ANALOG part on ECAL Intermediate Board (EIB) • DIGITAL part (=trigger logic) in ETRG board EIB to ECAL crate R PMT dynode D Q 1 + FF + 10 comp - - Output Signal from PMT Programmable threshold thresh Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  34. 100 80 60 40 20 0 Efficiency (%) Trigger threshold Deposited energy (SADCcounts) Test of analog part of trigger • Trigger efficiency as a function of deposited energy in single cell • Varying the programmable threshold, the trigger threshold moves Trigger threshold Trigger threshold Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  35. Y X Z Electron runs • Electron can release, in a given cell, an amount of energy which is several thousands larger than that of a MIP • In order to cover the full energy range, the signal is split in 2 and 1 branch is divided by a factor ~30 before ADC PMT (PhotoMultiplier Tube) PMT cell High gain Low gain Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  36. High gain vs low gain • We expect a straight line, but on some cells we see a spurius population  under study High Gain High Gain Low Gain Low Gain Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  37. Linearity plot : ADC counts vs beam energy • As a consequence • Anode ADC counts vs energy shows 2 slopes, up to 30GeV and from 50GeV up . No corrections for energy leakage applied • Linearity plot with dynode (again no corrections) shows a linear behaviour • Under investigation Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  38. Conclusions • ECAL ready for integration • FM electronics in production; ready end of April 2007  need to do SQ tests for all crates (Ecrate+HV+LV) ! • Test beam • shows good results in terms of MIP (protons) analysis; some unclear results for more energetic (tipically electrons) energy deposits  under investigation • very useful to debug and calibrate flight hardware and firmware ; positive test of trigger system and of DAQ procedure • More results at next TIM Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  39. BACKUP SLIDES

  40. Problems in zero suppression • In order to limit the bandwidth, only channels with an ADC count value above some limit (>2 in our case) are written out • This procedure is called zero suppression and it is authomatically run at the beginning of each data taking • Due to the large beam rate, some times a spurius event enters in the evaluation of the pedestal shifting its value SMALL pedestal shift Distribution cut at 9 ADC counts Fit is still possible Peak = 17.5 counts LARGE pedestal shift Distribution cut at 26(!) counts Fit is not possible Peak = ? Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa

  41. Mip distribution • We know how to fix this software problem; new software will be tested with cosmic ray runs • The effect is uncorrelated with the PMT number, so >90% of ECAL cells (1324 in total) have been equalized using the two scans at nominal voltage • Remaining channels can be equalized with ground level cosmic rays (muons instead of protons, but same properties for equalization) Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa MIP peak (ADC counts)

More Related