1 / 34

( TSINGHUA-GAMMON ) CONSTRUCTION SAFETY RESEARCH CENTER

( TSINGHUA-GAMMON ) CONSTRUCTION SAFETY RESEARCH CENTER. COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SAFETY AND APPLICATION OF BAMBOO AND METAL SCAFFOLDINGS IN HONG KONG. Fang Dongping,Wu Shenghou,Hua Bin and John Wong Tsinghua University and Gammon Construction Co Ltd. BACKGROUND. Market

jason
Télécharger la présentation

( TSINGHUA-GAMMON ) CONSTRUCTION SAFETY RESEARCH CENTER

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. (TSINGHUA-GAMMON)CONSTRUCTION SAFETY RESEARCH CENTER COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SAFETY AND APPLICATION OF BAMBOO AND METAL SCAFFOLDINGS IN HONG KONG Fang Dongping,Wu Shenghou,Hua Bin and John Wong Tsinghua University and GammonConstruction Co Ltd

  2. BACKGROUND • Market • Bamboo Scaffolding: More than 90% Market Share • Metal Scaffolding: Less than 10% Market Share • Safety Performance • Attitude of the public – safer • Attitude of Contractors – cheaper

  3. SAFETY PERFORMANCE — Bamboo Scaffolding related Accidents

  4. SAFETY PERFORMANCE — Bamboo Scaffolding related Accidents

  5. SAFETY PERFORMANCE — Bamboo Scaffolding related Accidents

  6. OBJECTIVES • For Government – Policy making • For Contractors – Decision making

  7. RESEARCH FRAME

  8. RESEARCH CONTENT • SAFETY PERFORMANCE Hazard Analysis - safety officers, scaffolders and workers (194) AHP – professionals in scaffolding (engineers, ASD and CITA) (20) Experimental Psychology – un-experienced students as examinants • ECONOMICAL EFFECTIVENES Contractors, suppliers (14) and projects (6) • SYNTHETICAL ASSESSMENT Project Managers(23/30)

  9. SAFETY PERFORMANCE — Safety Performance Assessment • Hazard Analysis • Theory foundation H=F×P×C where: F—frequency of being broken P—probability of being broken C—consequencies • Information sources Survey—Workers (scaffolders and non-scaffolders), Safety officers

  10. feeling Complex problem judgment logic structure of AHP SAFETY PERFORMANCE — Safety Performance Assessment • AHP • Theoretical foundation • Information sources Survey—Engineers in Scaffolding, safety professionals, Instructors from CITA

  11. SAFETY PERFORMANCE — Safety Performance Assessment • Conclusions • Hazard analysis Risk -Metal 0.32; Bamboo 0.68 • AHP Risk - Metal 0.39; Bamboo 0.61

  12. SYNTHETICAL ASSESSMENT— Objective The study takes the two major aspects and other factors such as construction quality and company’s images into consideration to assess these two kinds of scaffolding synthetically, so as to provide foundational information for the government to enact relevant policies and for contractors to choose scaffolding. • Safety Performance • Economic Effectiveness • Construction quality and company’s images, etc.

  13. SYNTHETICAL ASSESSMENT— Methodology

  14. SYNTHETICAL ASSESSMENT— Conclusions • Risk rating Metal scaffolding 0.842 Bamboo scaffolding 0.783

  15. CONCLUSIONS • Metal scaffolding should be encouraged for safety concern. • The erection and use of bamboo scaffolding should be better supervised due to its poor safety performance. • Contractors may make their own decisions by following the proposed procedure.

  16. COLLAPSE NEXT

  17. DESTROIED BY WIND NEXT

  18. DESTROIED BY GARBAGE NEXT

  19. PUTLOG BEING DISMANTLED NEXT

  20. STANDARD BEING DISMANTLED BACK

  21. Workplace Safety Evaluation Based on Experimental Psychology Dr. FANG Dongping Department of Construction Management, School of Civil Engineering Tsinghua University, Beijing

  22. OBJECTIVES • Comparing human’s physiological and psychological reactions in different working conditions. • Bamboo and Metal Scaffoldings as a case.

  23. DESCRIPTION OF THE EXPERIMENT • Measurement • Four indexes • Pulse • Pectoral Breathe • Ventral Breathe • Electrodermal Response • Equipments • Polygraph • Computer

  24. Benchmark Group

  25. Bamboo Scaffolding Group

  26. Metal Scaffolding Group

  27. ANALYSIS • Pulse • 80-Order AR Model • Burg Method – Power Spectrum

  28. ANALYSIS • Pectoral breathe and ventral breathe • 20-Order AR Model • Yule-Walker Method - Power Spectrum • Electrodermal Response

  29. LIMITATIONS • The equipments used in this experiment couldn't record the absolute value of the signals.

  30. CONCLUSIONS • The change of the pulse frequency* *3 beats per minute is the critical value (TIAN Xiuliang, 1996) *Pulse frequency would rise under tension (YANG Zhiliang, 1990 )

  31. CONCLUSIONS • The change in pulse rate in the bamboo group is significant, suggesting a fluctuation of emotion • The change of the metal group is not significant at the same level, indicating less fluctuation of emotion

  32. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS • Works Bureau of Hong Kong • Gammon Construction Ltd.Wei Loong Scaffolding Works Co. Ltd.AES Scaffolding Engineering Ltd. • Tsinghua Tongfang Electronic Co. Ltd. • Professor Francis Wong, Professor Albert Kwok, Professor S.W. Poon • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number 70172005) • Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Grant number 8002013).

  33. Workplace Safety Evaluation Based on Experimental Psychology Thanks 谢谢

More Related