190 likes | 314 Vues
This lecture explores the intricacies of peer relationships, focusing on the nature and value of friendships during childhood and adolescence. It discusses developmental changes in peer interactions, with an emphasis on how friendships provide social support and conflict resolution skills, as well as their impact on emotional well-being. Key findings from the Peer Lab are highlighted, including the dynamics of friendship stability, popularity, and the factors leading to friendship loss. These insights serve as a foundation for understanding the psychological aspects of peer relationships in child development.
E N D
Psychology 3260: Personality & Social Development Don Hartmann Spring 2007 Lecture 12: Peers II
Supplementary References: Friendship • Bukowski, W.M., & Hoza, B. (1989). Popularity and friendship: Issues in theory, measurement, and outcome. In T.J. Berndt & G.W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships in child development (pp. 15‑45). New York: Wiley. • Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. G. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 619-700). New York: Wiley. • Terry, R., & Coie, J.D. (1991). A comparison of methods for defining sociometric status among children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 867-880.
Overview of Peer Relations II Lecture • Nature of Peer Groups • Developmental changes in peer relations • Friendships • Value of Friendships • Peer Lab findings (Hartmann et al.) • Cordinates with text, pp. 425-430 & 445-450 • Next: Lect. #13a: Emotions I
The Heyday (1970-) • Descriptive studies of various ages and groups: Who does what with whom? • Chums, rejects, crowds, friendships; group structure (e.g., dominance) • Who are the major players: Asher, Berndt, Coie, Dodge, Gottman, Howes • Methods old and new: Sociometric assessments and observations; sequential analysis
DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGES IN PEER RELATIONS: The Beginning • Infants touch within the first 3 months of life • Around 6 months of age share toys, food, and the like with peers • By 1.5 years engaging in coordinated play with peers (see example involving Larry and Bernie on p. 441) • By 2 years, complementary roles (e.g., hide-and-seek) • With increasing age, interactions become more verbal and complex. By age 5, pretend play interactions become important
DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGES IN PEER RELATIONS: Childhood & adolescence • Elementary school: Interactions become increasingly sophisticated. Some identification with groups, such a Brownies and Cubs (6-10). • Preadolescence (8.5-10): Chumships (Sullivan) • Early Adolescence: Same-sex cliques (Dunphy)
DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGES IN PEER RELATIONS: Youth • Mid Adolescence: Heterosexual cliques & crowds (Brown) • Old Adolescence: Dating dyads
Friendships: Introduction • Definition: Reciprocal relationship with positive affect • Distinct from popularity • Importance • Source of social support • Conflict resolution skills • Preparation for adulthood • Can have bad consequences as well: Quality of friendships • Developmental Changes: Increasingly intimate and fewer in number with age
Friendships: Introduction • Definition: Reciprocal relationship with positive affect • Distinct from popularity • Importance • Source of social support • Conflict resolution skills • Preparation for adulthood • Can have bad consequences as well: Quality of friendships
George & Hartmann (1) • Relationship between friendship and popularity (George & Hartmann). 5th- & 6th-grade children administered • a rating scale sociometric‑‑and children were divided, by classrooms, into the bottom .25 (unpopular), middle .50 (average), and top .25 (popular) • Completed a questionnaire asking them to list up to 15 people who they considered to be their good friends
Results of George & Hartmann (2) • Children reported a mean ≈ 12 good friends • 80% of friends within a year of age • Few children had reciprocated cross‑sex friends • 70% in same school % Reciprocation Popularity Group
Results of George & Hartmann (3) Who is chosen as friends? • 12% unpopular; 47% average; 41% popular
Hartmann, Abbott, Pelzel, George, & Ward-Anderson Friendship Stability: Length of Time X Verified Status X Friendship Status % Friends Lost Weeks
Hartmann et al. Why Do Children Loose Friends? • Lack of recent Contact (33%) • Change in Interests (23%) • Negative Personality (21%) • Replaced by Other (21%) • Conflict (13%) • Third Party (10%) • Violation of Trust (10%)
Pelzel, Barrett, & Hartmann Feelings about their most significant friendship loss • What emotions did the loss precipitate? Anger, sadness, & confusion • How strong were the emotions? 2/3 stated experiencing strong negative feeling • How long did the feelings last? More than a month!
Summary of Peer Lab Friendship findings • Children describe having a substantial number of friendships • A substantial minority of which are not in their classroom • almost all of which are same gender • many of which are not reciprocated • Popular children are over-represented on lists of good friends • Friendships are dynamic—many are changing • How dynamic varies depending on how we assess • Friendship loss • Occurs for a variety of reason • And most individuals experience some pain with their most significant friendship loss
Summary of Social Cognition Lecture • Scientific Investigations Of The Peer Group: Heyday (1970‑) • Issues In Peer Relations • Developmental changes in peer relations • Friendships • Next: Lect. #13a: Emotions • Go in Peace