1 / 17

Jaekwan Shim, Yoon-Jeong Hwang, Yeon-Hee Kim, Kwan-Young Chung Forecast Research Division,

The Experiments of Sensitivity test with 2012 winter special observation data using WRF model. Jaekwan Shim, Yoon-Jeong Hwang, Yeon-Hee Kim, Kwan-Young Chung Forecast Research Division, National Institute of Meteorological Research, KMA. 2012 THORPEX-Asia Workshop. Background.

jbeal
Télécharger la présentation

Jaekwan Shim, Yoon-Jeong Hwang, Yeon-Hee Kim, Kwan-Young Chung Forecast Research Division,

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Experiments of Sensitivity test with 2012 winter special observation data using WRF model Jaekwan Shim, Yoon-Jeong Hwang, Yeon-Hee Kim, Kwan-Young Chung Forecast Research Division, National Institute of Meteorological Research, KMA 2012 THORPEX-Asia Workshop

  2. Background • Observation targets • Observe the weather elements using KMA ground-based • observation network • Observe the weather elements over the sea using Gisang1 • Observe the precipitation and cloud vertical structure • using Radio-sonde and wind-profiler, Radiometeor • The special observation has performed for two years around • middle area in south Korea West Sea Observation points of Central area Observation points of east coast line • Expectation of bservation effects− initial condition • Improve the initial field by assimilation scheme using obs data − cycle run • Reduce the forecast error (first guess) by adding observation • data continuously • − location • Verify the optimal locations of Observation that are sensitive to the • predictibility

  3. Background Looks like Similar initial conditions for each observation It can make differences in 48-h forecasts! BOS BOSINC INC CNTL 00 fcst 48fcst

  4. Objective • Sensitivity Analysis • − Evaluating how observation data affects a forecast • − Location for which additional observations may • reduce errors or improve the forecast • evaluate the initial increments translated downstream • investigation of observation location are sensitive to the forecast • the precipitation forecast is investigated.

  5. Cases 1200UTC 31 JAN 2012 • The selected case is the developing cyclone while passing the West sea and • Korean peninsula • the cold front was formed over the south korea on 31 January 2012. • The relatively plenty of snow fall is recorded along cold front. • The stream line and moisture flux flowed in Korean peninsula between the • Siberia high and north Pacific high at least for 24 hours.

  6. Experiment design(I)

  7. Experiment design(II) 00 06 12 18 24 30 36 UTC 72-h forecast 72-h forecast CYCLE run 72-h forecast 3DVAR data assimilation

  8. Sensitivity Experiment : Results Increments (A-B) on 0600UTC 26 JAN 2012 BOS BOSINC INC CNTL Increments (A-B) on 1200UTC 26 JAN 2012

  9. Sensitivity Experiment : Results Increments (A-B) on 1200UTC 30 JAN 2012 BOS BOSINC INC CNTL Increments (A-B) on 1200UTC 31 JAN 2012

  10. Sensitivity Experiment : Results 12 hr accumulated precipitation and difference (1200UTC 31 JAN 2012) BOSINC CNTL INC BOS Difference (experiments-CNTL) AWS TMPA

  11. Sensitivity Experiment : Results Exps - CTN Difference of 850 hPa Mixing ratio (exp-ctl) on 0600 UTC 31 JAN 2012 at initial Difference of 850 hPa Mixing ratio (exp-ctl) on 0600 UTC 31 JAN 2012 at 12hr fcst

  12. Sensitivity Experiment : Results INC BOS BOSINC Increments of 850 relative humidity 850 wind vectors F00 F12 F24

  13. Sensitivity Experiment : Results INC BOS BOSINC F00 Increments of 500 height from -6 to 6 850 equivalent potential Temperature F12 F24

  14. Sensitivity Experiment : Results ETS for 12 hours accumulated prec. On 31 January 2012 2.5mm/12hrETS (2012012600~2012020118) 12hrETS (2012013112)

  15. Sensitivity Experiment : Results RMSE of height and Temperature Geopotential height Temperature • At low altitude, RMSE of height of all experiments show small difference. • Otherwise, CNTL and INC have the largest RMSE than BOS and BOSINC • at upper altitude. • RMSE of temperature is similar with RMSE of height except for low levels. • The observation data of Boseong reduced the RMSE in this case.

  16. Summary and Conclusion • observation data is used to identify sensitivity regions of winter 2012 • over south Korea. • Sensitivity test is conducted using two points of observation data • initial increments in experiments were introduced near the • observing points. • These increments damped as they translated downstream. • Predictability of BOS and BOSINC are better than INC and CNTL(noDA). • The moisture adjustment contribute the improvement of predictability • To improve predictability of south Korea, observation of the south is • important in land. If supplementary observation is needed, it must be • conducted over the south of the Korean Peninsula.

More Related