1 / 15

PS TFB

Project triggered by: K. Schindl and R. Cappi Hardware: J. Belleman, A. Blas, T. Bohl, F. Caspers, J.L. Gonzalez, W. Hofle, J. M. Lacroix, S. Livesley, R. Louwerse, M. Paoluzzi, F. Pedersen, V. Rossi, J. Sladen

jcoble
Télécharger la présentation

PS TFB

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project triggered by: K. Schindl and R. Cappi Hardware: J. Belleman, A. Blas, T. Bohl, F. Caspers, J.L. Gonzalez, W. Hofle, J. M. Lacroix, S. Livesley, R. Louwerse, M. Paoluzzi, F. Pedersen, V. Rossi, J. Sladen Hardware simulations: V. Vendramini, E. Vogel Beam decoherence study:E. Benedetto, M. Chanel, M. Martini, E. Metral, F. Zimmermann PS TFB Where do we come from? Where are we? Where do we go? AB-RF-FB section meeting

  2. PS TFB History 05/98 First meeting, start of the PS TFB project 10/98 Start study of a kicker prototype (J-L Gonzalez) 06/99 H Kicker mechanical design started (J-M Roux) 11/99 Mechanical drawings in the final version. 01/00 Price Enquiry for a single bloc vacuum chamber (3 pieces; H + V + spare) 04/00 Second price enquiry sent for vacuum pipes in two pieces (no response for single bloc) 10/00 Order placed to Metaceram (Hiperceramics was second) 05/02 Order cancelled 08/02 New price inquiry 10/02 Order placed to Hiperceramics; delivery planned for April 2003 01/03 Project taken over by rf 10/03 Successful test of electronic prototype on old kicker an amplifier 11/03 Delivery of ceramic pipes 01/04 H kicker Delivered, Ceramic pipe not vacuum tight after brazing (weak metallization) 08/04 Re-design of transition pieces 10/04 Order placed for re-metallization (SCT) and new ceramic rings (Hiperceramics) AB-RF-FB section meeting

  3. PS TFB 1 2 3 AB-RF-FB section meeting

  4. PS TFB Kickers • Initial requirements: R. Cappi 1999 • Damping of a +/-1.5 mm oscillation within 100 turns (chromaticity) • Bandwidth: [10kHz - 20 MHz] (q = 0.1, 20 MHz kicker ripple) • Decision taken • 2 x 3 kW, magnetic kicker • Final result (F. Caspers 12/04) • Usable bandwidth = 10 MHz (limited by non linear phase and transit time factor (68 ns) • Field above Roberto’s specs (factor 7) AB-RF-FB section meeting

  5. PS TFB Kickers • Workload for modifying the magnetic kicker? • make it shorter (1/3) for transit time factor • Change the shape of capacitive plate to increase ZC • This means a complete re-design Could we use the old strip line kicker? yes!! (see next slide) AB-RF-FB section meeting

  6. PS TFB Kickers • Why is the strip line kicker ok for the job? • with 2 x 3 kW, it give almost exactly what is required in term of kick • Its bandwidth is only limited by the transit time factor of 3 ns (166 MHz) • What ‘s wrong with it? • Impedance matching to be improved • Impedance transformer required with present amplifiers From Reinier Input impedance: 12.5 Ω Output impedance: 112.5 Ω (x9) Each coax: 37.5 Ω = two 75 Ω in // Voltage gain = 3 AB-RF-FB section meeting

  7. PS TFB Kickers • Is there a security margin with the strip line kicker? • The LHC beams have been obtained without dampers  • Factor 6.25 in kick strength with nominal LHC beam (to be checked with totem beam) • (decoherence in 2ms, 0.32 ms calculated by Roberto) • Chromaticity could be lowered by a factor 2 in 2007 (new PFW power supplies) • What ‘s unknown (yet)? • Impedance transformer characteristics AB-RF-FB section meeting

  8. PS TFB Amplifiers • Initial requirements • Bandwidth: [10kHz - 20 MHz] • 3 kW on 12.5 Ω • Actual performances • Bandwidth: [100kHz - 35MHz] • 3 kW – 2 ms, 100 W CW • What ‘s unknown? • Precise phase response AB-RF-FB section meeting

  9. PS TFB Amplifiers • What’s wrong? • The first Betatron line (q. FREV) is not covered • Does it matter? • There are two answers to this question, one valid for injection damping, the other for h-t instabilities • ( Injection damping is faster than the growth rate of h-t instabilities -1ms vs 10 to 100 ms) • During injection, what matters is the spectrum of the beam. Less than 8 % of the energy is in the first Betatron line. If it isn’t driven instable, there should be only 8% less damping efficiency in linear regime and almost no difference in saturation mode. • For h-t modes, only the negative (n+Q).FREV lines are instable, but somehow “compensated” by the positive spectral lines… except (when ξ≠0) for the first negative line n = -7 or (1-q).FREV . • As q Є [0.2 0.4], n = -7 mode Є [348 kHz, 261 kHz]. This instable line is covered by the amplifier. Of course the q.FREV line should be “electronically” stable. Is there a proof? see next slide ! AB-RF-FB section meeting

  10. PS TFB Amplifiers Is there a proof that the system would work with 100 kHz HP cutoff? Injection error damping with wideband feedback With H.P. Simulations from Elmar 50 turns/div AB-RF-FB section meeting

  11. PS TFB Amplifiers details of the simulation • Is there a proof concerning h-t instabilities? • It is a well established theory ! AB-RF-FB section meeting

  12. PS TFB Amplifiers • Has everything been taken into account? • e-p instabilities: not observed in the PS ! • h-t modes: have a damping effect with positive ηξ (both negative at PS injection) => positive chromatic frequency. It damps the injection errors with a time constant of 5 ms (20 ms total damping) without emittance blow-up (simulation by Elias) • Chromaticity and Chromatic frequency: it changes the instable m-mode but not the • frequency at which it should be corrected. In 2007 we might have a lower ξ => less kick requirements • Broadband impedance: should damp the lower modes without blow-up. • Under simulation (E. B. + F. Z.) • Space charge: it is beneficial as it increases the filamentation time. • Under simulation (E. B. + F. Z.) • Octupolar tune: speeds-up filamentation but not foreseen in normal operation • Real kicker ripple (30 MHz): ok with the amplifier (35 MHz) AB-RF-FB section meeting

  13. PS TFB Electronic core • How do we do? • Use of LHC 1TFB and TFB hardware made compatible with minor add-ons • Specific FPGA programming software AB-RF-FB section meeting

  14. PS TFB Budget No budget allocation for 2005. 133 kCHF need to be found!! - 3kW power loads: 10k - Impedance matching transformers: 8k (6k FSU + 2k material) - Kicker modification (mechanical setup for fixing Xformers and loads + install new feedthroughs): 8k (7k FSU + 1k material) - Interlock circuit design and construction: 16k (6k study + 10k construction) - Construction of circuits developed for LHC: 12k - VME crate to plug new PCBs : 10k - Strip-line Kicker modification: 15k (5k mech. Study, 10k construction and material) - Power amplifiers modification: 35k (in case we do not change the PCB's) - Cabling in racks: 4k - Ceramic pipes end work: 10k - Unexpected: 5k Total: 133 kCHF What has been spent: H/V kicker study: 100k H kick construction: 100k Ceramic pipes: 100k Electronics, cabling: 50k Total: 350k Originally planned: 360k AB-RF-FB section meeting

  15. PS TFB Workload • - 3kW power loads: 1 W • - Impedance matching transformers: 4 W • Kicker modification : 4 W • Interlock circuit design and construction: 7 W • - Construction and test of circuits developed for LHC: 3 W • - VME crate: 1 W • - Strip-line Kicker modification: 4 W • - Power amplifiers modification: 12 W • - Cabling in racks: 1 W • Ceramic pipes end work: 1 W • FPGA programming: 8 W • Supervision: 3 W • Unexpected: 3 W • Commissioning (hard + beam): 3 + 3 W • Total: 58 W AB-RF-FB section meeting

More Related