1 / 14

Inductive Learning in Design: Case Study on Antifriction Bearing Systems

This article explores the application of inductive learning in the design process, specifically for selecting antifriction bearing systems. It discusses the methodology, training and testing events, and the empirical errors of the learned rule set. The study concludes that machine learning can provide accurate solutions for design tasks, but further collaboration with skilled designers is necessary for verification.

jcolclough
Télécharger la présentation

Inductive Learning in Design: Case Study on Antifriction Bearing Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Inductive Learning in Design:A Method and Case Study Concerning Design of Antifriction Bearing Systems Machine Learning and Data Mining : Methods and Applications 1999년 6월 19일 토요일 99406-810 산업공학과 허 원 창

  2. Contents • Introduction • Exemplary problem • Testing and Training events • Exemplary rule set obtained • Empirical errors of learned rule set • Degree of Confidence • Conclusion

  3. Introduction • A Method for Learning Design Rule • in design process - design knowledge is important but ambiguous, and there are many solutions in design problem • in applying Inductive Learning Method - recognizing design knowledge and representing it in the for of rule is important • in this chapter - learning rules for selecting anti-friction bearing systems • Global Steps • defines attributes used for characterizing design examples • describe design examples with selected attributes • determining training and testing examples • learning through AQ15c and obtaining rule set

  4. Example Problem • Design of Bearing arrangement • Design Process

  5. Training and Testing Events • Design Knowledge Source • catalogues of rolling bearing, text books on machine design, special publications issued by producers of bearing..... • Conversions of quantitative data to qualitative data • Database Examples • bearing types : deep grove ball bearing, angular contact ball bearing, self-aligning ball bearing, cylindrical roller bearings.. • 10-26 events for each bearings • 101088 possible events • need more events from design experts

  6. Domains of Attributes • Domains of Attributes

  7. Exemplary Training Events • training events of the class ‘deep groove ball bearing’

  8. Exemplary rules # of unique events that support rule total # of events that support rule • exemplary rule concerning ‘deep groove ball bearing’

  9. Empirical Error of learned rule sets • overall empirical error rate • Empirical omission error rate • Empirical comission error rate

  10. Testing Results • Testing results using ‘leave-one-out’ method

  11. Evaluation of Training Example • Evaluation of training example

  12. Exemplary Degree of Confidence • exemplary Degree of confidence

  13. Conclusion • In problems of deriving useful design knowledge in order to aid designer in routine design task • The feasibility of the application of machine learning in case of selecting the type of bearing. • can suggests several solution to designers. • The ruleset obtained features high degree of accuracy. • Further verification of results require cooperation with skilled designers

More Related