1 / 7

Workgroup for Long-Term Ground-Water Level Monitoring in Maryland Outcome of June 2002 Workshop

Find out about the outcomes of the June 2002 workshop on evaluating and enhancing existing ground-water level networks in Maryland. This report documents recommendations for improving the monitoring networks and optimizing their effectiveness.

jcourson
Télécharger la présentation

Workgroup for Long-Term Ground-Water Level Monitoring in Maryland Outcome of June 2002 Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Workgroup for Long-Term Ground-Water Level Monitoring in MarylandOutcome of June 2002 Workshop The purpose of the workgroup is to evaluate existing ground-water level networks in Maryland in order to make recommendations for their enhancement and optimization.

  2. Goals • Evaluate current ground-water level monitoring networks. • Make recommendations to improve the network based on monitoring objectives. • Publish a report that documents the workgroup’s recommendations.

  3. Workgroup Members • County Governments • Baltimore County • Carroll County • Montgomery County • Prince George’s County • State Agencies • Maryland Geological Survey • Maryland Department of the Environment • Federal Agencies • U.S. Geological Survey

  4. Objectives of Monitoring Network(s) in Maryland • Climate variability • Ground-water use • Ground water and environmental systems • Ground-water research • Water quality* *Currently not a direct goal of the workgroup

  5. Field Evaluation

  6. Recommendations • Make recommendations to improve the network by: • Monitoring additional wells • Discontinuing monitoring at certain wells • Changing the monitoring frequency • Workgroup will produces a jointly authored report to Council

More Related