1 / 19

Remaining in ‘Good standing’

This document discusses the concept of 'Remaining in Good Standing' processes within higher education, emphasizing sector engagement and feedback as critical components. It introduces proposals for effective collaboration with various educational groups and outlines a system for credit allocation related to professional development. Additionally, it presents survey results indicating support for a Code of Practice for Fellows and explores implications for institutions and HEA staff. The document also raises essential questions regarding the relevance and application of the Code in the sector.

jed
Télécharger la présentation

Remaining in ‘Good standing’

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Remaining in ‘Good standing’

  2. Introduction and context

  3. A working definition…

  4. Proposals - remaining in good standing 4

  5. Sector engagement is critical • Feedback from the sector • How remaining in good standing could be used • Need to work with groups, for example: • SHED, HEDG, SEDA, ALDinHE, SDF, ALTand HR Networks

  6. Accreditation

  7. Current Example

  8. Notes for Staff

  9. Notes for Managers

  10. A system of allocating credit for engagement in HEA provided professional development opportunities 12

  11. HEA endorsement of professional development provided by external agencies 13

  12. Collaborative approach to Fellowship between the HEA, subject associations and learned societies

  13. A Code of Practice for Fellows

  14. Phases of the code’s development…

  15. Survey outcomes • 2677 responses • Indicated widespread support to introduce code in spite of reservations about its practical usefulness and the code itself • The usefulness of the code will be greatly enhanced if introduced as part of a good standing process rather than in isolation • Code launched at the Annual Subscribers Meeting on 2 Oct 2013

  16. What next? • HEA staff remaining in good standing • HEA accreditor remaining in good standing • How will institutions approach remaining in good standing? • HR process? • Central Development Unit? • Local at Faculty/Department level? • What impact will this have on HESA return and the QAA?

  17. Code of Practice/ Remaining in good standing: Questions for the sector Why do we need the Code of Practice? Is the Code of Practice duplicating the UK PSF? How do we/can we use the Code of Practice? Are there other models for remaining in good standing which your institution could embrace? What if a staff member does not remain in good standing? Under what circumstances would you, as leaders in the sector, want the HEA to revoke recognition?

More Related