1 / 37

Soft X-Ray pulse length measurement

Soft X-Ray pulse length measurement. Alberto Lutman Jacek Krzywinski Juhao Wu Zhirong Huang Marc Messerschmidt …. 17.February.2011. Soft X-Ray Pulse length Determination. Electron Beam. Spectrometer. SASE FEL Amplifier. t. T. Goal: recover T from the spectra

jena-wall
Télécharger la présentation

Soft X-Ray pulse length measurement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Soft X-Ray pulse length measurement Alberto Lutman Jacek Krzywinski Juhao Wu Zhirong Huang Marc Messerschmidt … 17.February.2011

  2. Soft X-Ray Pulse length Determination Electron Beam Spectrometer SASE FEL Amplifier t T Goal: recover T from the spectra (correlation technique proposed by Jacek K.)

  3. Electron Beam Current profile tk is a random variable having probability density f(t) Current Fourier Transform t FEL transfer function in Exponential growth The spectrometer transfer function For Saturation, we run numerical simulations

  4. Correlation of the radiation intensity at the exit of the spectrometer Frequencies that we correlate Single shot correlation, to be: averaged on many shots normalized Single shot spectrum

  5. Calculation of the G2 function for different profiles To find an analytical expression for G2 we need just to plug in the f(t) function

  6. Gaussian Electrons Profile * * G2 bunch profile ° ° # # M: “number of modes” With our spectrometer resolution, the rms of the bell shape is due to the spectrometer bandwidth

  7. Flat top vs Gaussian G2 We cannot distinguish between: - Gaussian profile with rms length - Flat Top profile with full length

  8. Some adressed Issues Statistical Gain Scales the measured function by Central Frequency Jitter

  9. Numerical Simulations 1) Verified that relations hold well enough in saturation 2) Recover bunch length and spectrometer bandwith Bunch Length = 10 mm

  10. A Matalab GUI to process the data Select a Subset of the collected spectra Plot spectra and Shot-to-shot recorded quantities Datasets Shot by shot quantities Calculate G2 Function Re-align Spectra Show Bunch Length Result

  11. Bunch Length vs # of Undulators (2 November 2010 Data) FWHM Gaussian fs 13 16 19 25 22 28 Undulators

  12. Spectrometer relative bandwidth (2 November 2010 Data) Spectrometer Relative bandwidth 13 16 19 22 25 28 Undulators

  13. Bunch Length vs different peak current (26 January 2011 Data) FWHM Gaussian fs Peak current kA

  14. Next Steps Include cases with non monoenergetic electron bunch - Two gaussian with different energies case - Including a linear energy chirp Analyze in detail data collected January 26 2011 Finish to write the paper Adapt the matlab GUI to be used in Control Room

  15. THE END

  16. Different pulses have different Gain Electron arrivals density probability T as a random variable with probability density p(t) Gain is function of T (e.g. smaller T, gives higher peak current and higher gain)

  17. Statistical gain and FEL gain depending on profile length We are using indeed a different average profile The correlation function is affected by the statistical gain In case the gain is independent of T, the relation between G2 with and without the gain is the following:

  18. Statistical gain and FEL gain depending on profile length We can observe that And get rid of this effect Using the offset of G2 normalizing shot by shot each spectrum with its energy Both approaches are not easy to apply when analyzing the real noisy spectral data

  19. Double Gaussian Electrons Profile

  20. Gaussian Electrons Profile GASSIAN WITH SIGMA T

  21. Flat Top Electrons Profile

  22. Statistical Gain Considering the model of incoherent radiation, the intensity at a certain frequency can be written We let the charge C fluctuate, and correlate intensities at two different frequencies w’ and w’’ with

  23. Spectra Central Frequency jitter Considering the model of incoherent radiation, the intensity at a certain frequency can be written We let the charge C fluctuate, and correlate intensities at two different frequencies w’ and w’’ with

  24. Different pulses have different Gain The G2 function is multiplied by

  25. We can observe that for large To get rid of the multiplicative effect we can: Use the offset of G2s normalize shot by shot each spectrum with its integral Both approaches are not easy to apply when analyzing the real noisy spectral data

  26. Numerical Simulations Flat top electrons profile Full Length = 10 um Radiation Wavelength = 1.5 A Rho = 4.5 x 10-4 Gain Length = 2.98 m Undulator Length = 100 m Number of Shots = 2000 Slippage Length = 0.5 um Analytical theory has been dereived in the linear regime. Simulation have been carried to determine if the theory is still applicable in saturation. Simulations have been also done for Gaussian electrons profile

  27. Power vs Undulator Distance Gaussian electrons profile Flat top electrons profile

  28. Flat top electrons profile Agreement: Z=30m Linear regime Z=60m saturation Z=100m Deep saturation

  29. Flat top electrons profile 2 Agreement: Z=30m Linear regime 2 2 Z=60m saturation Z=100m Deep saturation

  30. G2 function Flat top electrons profile

  31. Simulations with Peak Current Jitter 30 m 60 m

  32. Shot by Shot quantities For each shot, beside the spectra, other quantities have been recorded: x-ray pulse energy Electron bunch charge Electron bunch energy X and Y position X and Y angle Peak current

  33. Filtering the datasets Theory assumes that different shots differ only by the arrival time of the electrons. This is not the case for the real data. We use the data collected to filter and keep only a subset of the spectra Filter: - bunch charge - bunch energy - peak current

  34. Correlation between Energy and First moment The Gui allows to: show each spectrum profile plot recorded quantities Spectra first moment Electron bunch energy

  35. Spectra Realignment We can realign the spectra, using the strong linear correlation between electron bunch energy and first moment We can either: Both approaches lead to the same bunch length result

  36. Evaluation of the correlation function We calculate the correlation function. Interface leaves some freedom to: - Deal with backgroud noise issue - Deal with gain issue Bunch length is calculated with flat top and gaussian models

  37. Results from data collected November 2nd, 2010 Only 6 sets of data collected with: 200 lines/mm monochromator 3 kA peak current Different number of undulators Can be used to calculate the bunch length. Other sets have: • Too low spectrometer resolution • Too low signal to noise ratio

More Related